Foxes guarding the chicken coop or Hartford politics as usual.

With relatively little fan-fare last fall, Board of Education Chairman Matt Poland appointed a 13 member search committee to choose a new superintendent of schools for the Hartford School System.

Poland, who is not only appointed to the Board of Education by Mayor Segarra, is also the Director of the Hartford City Library, an organization which receives the vast majority of its funding from the Mayor and Hartford City Council.

In his announcement Poland appointed four members of the Hartford Board of Education to the search committee, including himself, but committed to give up his spot to a new member following their swearing-in ceremony in December.

In addition to the four members of the Board of Education, Marlene Ibsen, a Travelers executive was appointed to the Search Committee as a representative of the MetroHartford Alliance business group. Oz Griebel is president and CEO of MetroHartford Alliance and has been one of the leading advocates for the corporate education reform agenda in Hartford.

What makes the appointed especially interesting is that Travelers is the chief corporate sponsor of High School, Inc., “a four-year college prep school for Hartford Public School students in grades 9-12 who are interested in pursuing careers in the insurance and financial services industries.”

Last month, the Hartford Board of Education was presented with a secret “Sheff lawsuit plan” that called for opening up two new magnet schools in Hartford and handing Capital Prep and the S.A.N.D. elementary school over to a private company set up by Capital Prep Principal Steve Perry.

Citing the lack of any public hearing or public input into the controversial plan, the Hartford Board of Education rejected the secret deal.

However, three weeks ago the Hartford Board of Education reversed course and with no public hearing or public input, authorized “the state and district to convert High School Inc….to a Sheff magnet school beginning with ninth grade in 2014-15 and gradually expanding to 12th grade by 2017-18.”

The deal will divert hundreds of thousands to the Travelers’ affiliated school despite the fact that “the school has posted low scores on the Connecticut Academic Performance Test. This year, only 5 percent of 10th-graders met the state’s goal in mathematics this year, while less than half of the school’s test-takers were proficient in math, science and reading. Travelers supported the conversion to a magnet program, according to [Hartford school] board member Cherita McIntye, who was involved in negotiations.”

However, despite the appearance of a potential financial conflict of interest, Travelers will continue to serve on the Hartford Superintendent Search Committee.

Another member of the Hartford Superintendent Search Committee is Capital Community College President Wilfredo Nieves. While Nieves is widely respected for his leadership at Capital Community College, the college desperately needs to find additional revenue and additional tenants to fill unused space at the College.

Over the past few years, Governor Malloy has made the deepest cuts in state history to Connecticut’s public colleges and universities. More than anything else, Connecticut’s colleges now need to find additional revenue, whether through tuition increases or revenue from new tenants.

The secret Sheff deal has also included authorizing Capital Community College to open a magnet school despite the fact that Capital Prep Magnet School used to be affiliated with the college before Capital Prep broke off on its own.

As with the Hartford High Inc. magnet school deal, three weeks ago, the Hartford School Board reversed itself on the Capital Community College proposal and voted 6-1 to allow “state and school officials to move forward with creating Capital Community College Senior Academy, a magnet school to be established for 11th and 12th graders next year in partnership with the community college in Hartford.”

Again, despite the appearance of a potential financial conflict of interest, the President of Capital Community College remains on the Hartford Superintendent Search Committee.

Another member of the Hartford superintendent search committee is Mayra Esquilin, the executive director of HART (Hartford Areas Rally Together).

Esquilin is not only a member of Board of Directors of Achieve Hartford Inc. the leading corporate funded education reform organization in Hartford, but even after being added to the Superintendent Search Committee, Esquilin and Hartford Areas Rally Together submitted a proposal to the City of Hartford in response to a Request for Proposals for a community based organization to rally parents at the Clark School to support handing their school over to Achievement First, Inc. the large charter school management company co-founded by Malloy’s Commissioner of Education, Stefan Pryor.

Although the $19,400 contract went to another organization called the Multi-Cultural Community Alliance, Esquilin has been extremely outspoken in favor of restructuring S.A.N.D. elementary, the school that was supposed to go to Perry’s private company as part of the secret Sheff Deal.

According to a recent Hartford Courant article, Esquilin said “that she and others canvassed the neighborhood over the past few days and found many parents who were uninformed — and in some cases, misinformed — about the SAND proposal.”

It isn’t exactly clear who is paying Esquilin and HART to work on the S.A.N.D. school effort (watch for an upcoming Wait, What? post on the topic), but despite appearance of a financial conflict of interest, Mayra Esquilin remains on the Hartford Superintendent Search Committee.

And the list goes on…

Considering the size and diversity of Hartford, it is either a sad commentary or an incredible message that the powers that be appointed a number of people with direct or potential conflicts of interest to the search committee for the most important non-elected official in Hartford.

Meanwhile, according to a Hartford Courant story yesterday entitled, Hartford Picks Iowa Firm For Superintendent Search, “The city’s superintendent search committee has chosen the Iowa firm Ray and Associates Inc. to find the next schools leader for Hartford…The contract with Ray and Associates to conduct a national search should total no more than $24,000, according to school board Chairman Matthew Poland.”

David Samuels: The Community Party’s Powerful Voice for Social Justice

David Samuels is the founder of the Community Party.  The Community Party is a Connecticut statewide network of activists dedicated to addressing issues of social justice and criminal justice reform.  Samuels and the Community Party have been working to educate people and change public policy on a wide variety of issues.  In particular, Samuels and the Community Party have been the driving force behind the effort to force Connecticut’s elected officials to confront the unconstitutional policies of racial profiling in Connecticut. 

The group is also playing a fundamental role in pushing for an effective workplace bullying law in Connecticut and highlighting rampant discriminatory practices the remain in Connecticut state government.

Samuels writes a regular commentary piece for the Hartford News.  His blog, which features those columns and other pieces he has written can be found at: No Sellout.

His twitter feed is @CommunityParty1  and the Community Party’s Facebook Page is

As those who have followed Samuels and the Community Party already know, the organization has become increasingly involved in supporting and highlighting the role parents can play in the fight to ensure local schools are adequately funded and supported and that they are not turned over to the corporate education reform industry.

Parents, teachers, public school advocates and community activists across Connecticut should make the Community Party’s work mandatory reading and seek ways to join forces with the Community Party on these vital issues.

Here is a column David Samuels wrote for the Nov. 21 – 27 edition of the Hartford News.  It can also be found at Clark and SAND School Parents Push Back Against the Charter School Hustle.

In addition, Samuels’ Facebook page features great videos on the Clark School and S.A.N.D. School parent uprisings.

Here is Samuels recent commentary piece entitled;

Clark and SAND School Parents Push Back Against the Charter School Hustle

Tuesday night Clark Rising, a grassroots group of Clark Elementary School parents, SAND Elementary School parents and local public school advocates joined forces to fight back against the corporate takeover of both schools by Achievement First, Inc. and Capital Preparatory Magnet School, respectively. The showdown took place at the monthly Hartford Board of Education meeting. Parents told me their chief complaint was that they are being excluded from conversations about the direction of Hartford schools such as Clark, SAND and Rawson, the site of the BOE meeting. I spoke with Rawson Principal Gerald Martin, who claimed that he has been making an effort to reach out to parents. Martin said that he had no personal opinion on the charter school concept and that the decision on privatization should be left up to Gov. Dannel Malloy and the parents.

Last week Hartford Mayor Pedro Segarra announced that he would not support an Achievement First takeover of Clark School. However that doesn’t mean this plan is dead; the BOE made that clear at the meeting. During the public comment portion city resident Hyacinth Yennie accused the BOE of pitting parents against each other “with so called choice.” She brought up the “blue ribbon” Dwight School which was shut down as an example of the BOE using “failing schools” as a ruse to justify privatization. The crowd at Rawson roared in approval when Yennie urged city officials to “put a leash on Dr.(Steve) Perry.” Perry is the principal at Capital Prep. BOE Chairman Matt Poland was unconvincing as he denied being a pawn of the charter school power brokers and attempted to demonize public school advocates. Achievement First was co-founded by Stefan Prior, Gov. Malloy’s Commissioner of Education. Perry is the central figure in the plan to privatize SAND School. Apparently Mayor Segarra and the BOE are allowing Perry to take a quasi-paid leave of absence from his taxpayer funded job (he’s been absent 20% of the school year and arrived late or left early numerous times) so he can act as an agent for the charter school industry. Charter schools are big business. Really big business. Democracy Now! co-host Juan Gonzalez reported on the charter school hustle in 2010. He explained how Wall Street investors are reaping huge windfalls from school privatization.

“One of the things I’ve been trying now for a couple of years is to try to figure out why is it that so many hedge fund managers, wealthy Americans, big banks and executives of Wall Street banks have all lined up supporting and getting involved in the development of charter schools. And I think I may have come across one of the reasons: there’s a lot of money to be made in charter schools. And I’m not talking just about the for-profit management companies that run a lot of these charter schools.

“It turns out that at the tail end of the Clinton administration in 2000, Congress passed a new kind of tax credit called a New Markets Tax Credit. And what this allows is it gives an enormous federal tax credit to banks and equity funds that invest in community projects in underserved communities, and it’s been used heavily now for the last several years for charter schools. And I focused on Albany, New York, which in New York state is the district with the highest percentage of children in charter schools. Twenty percent of the schoolchildren in Albany are now attending charter schools. And I discovered that quite a few of the charter schools there have been built using these New Markets Tax Credits.

“And what happens is, the investors who put up the money to build the charter schools get to basically virtually double their money in seven years through a 39 percent tax credit from the federal government. In addition, this is a tax credit on money that they’re lending, so they’re collecting interest on the loans, as well as getting the 39 percent tax credit. They piggyback the tax credit on other kinds of federal tax credits, like historic preservation or job creation or Brownfields credits. The result is, you can put in $10 million and in seven years double your money.

“And the problem is that the charter schools end up paying in rents the debt service on these loans. And so, now a lot of the charter schools in Albany are straining paying their debt — their rent has gone up from $170,000 to $500,000 in a year, or huge increases in their rents, as they strain to pay off these construction loans. And the rents are eating up huge portions of their total cost. And, of course, the money is coming from the state.

“So, one of the big issues is that so many of these charter schools are not being audited. No one knows who are the people making these huge windfall profits as the investors. And often there are interlocking relationships between the charter school boards and the nonprofit groups that organize and syndicate the loans. And so, there needs to be sunlight on this whole issue. And the state legislature right now is considering expanding charter school caps, but one of the things I press for in my column, there has to be the power of the government to independently audit all of these charter schools, or we’re not going to know how public dollars are ending up in the coffers of Wall Street investors.”

Black Agenda Report commentator Bruce Dixon recently wrote a column on charter schools. Dixon talked about the true socioeconomic and political purpose of school privatization. ”Doug Henwood, a radical economist and founder of Left Business Observer, says it as succinctly as anyone when he sums up the goal of bipartisan corporate education reform imposed on poorer neighborhoods as ‘…low cost privatized holding tanks leading to McDonalds jobs for the lucky, or to prison for the not so lucky…’ along with classes delivered by computers rather than unionized teachers. But as useful as this summation is, it leaves out one element worth noting. You can’t run a global empire without a military class, any more than you can run a prison without prison guards… Before the era of corporate reform there was at least one achievement of genuine small d democratic education reform pushed through by the administration of Chicago mayor Harold Washington in the 1980s. Since then parents in every public school have been allowed to elect parent councils, with reps from among rank and file teachers, which have veto power over title one funds and principal’s contracts, which are limited to two years. The ‘innovative’ answer of downtown bureaucrats, corporate elites and subsequent mayors to parents taking a hand in running the schools has been to simply close Chicago public schools and replace them with charters over which parents have no say. What mayor and what alderman really want organized parents running their own neighborhood institutions? It’s bad for business if you’re a privatizer, or a politician who takes cues and campaign contributions from privatizers. And ultimately habits of local democracy are bad for empire.”

Last week Jonathan Pelto exposed how Perry used workplace bullying to further his attempt to take over SAND School and start his own charter school management company. Jonathan reported that Capital Prep teachers came forward to complain about Perry’s administrative team pressuring them to write letters to the BOE supporting Perry’s plan. Administrators told teachers to use their work emails to send these letters and to copy Perry on the emails, which would provide Perry and his team with a record of which teachers were playing ball. Jonathan pointed out that Perry using his subordinates to lobby the BOE is a clear violation of BOE policies, which prohibit the use of work emails for political activity. Late Tuesday night the school board voted 5-3 against the SAND proposal. Mayor Segarra said he would not support the plan due to a lack of support by the parents. Congratulations to the Clark and SAND school parents and public school advocates on their victory! The link to Jonathan’s report, DN’s archive on charter schools, Gonzalez’s New York Daily News column on the school privatization cash scam and Dixon’s commentary are available in our Resources section.

For the full commentary piece including some valuable resources go to: Clark and SAND School Parents Push Back Against the Charter School Hustle.

School Choice or Extortion (By Wendy Lecker)

Public education advocate and fellow commentator Wendy Lecker has an outstanding piece in this weekend’s Stamford Advocate and other Hearst Media outlets about Hartford’s recent “school choice” debacle.

You can find Wendy’s piece at:  Below is a somewhat longer version.

Both do an excellent job laying out the issues surrounding Achievement First, Inc., Capital Prep and Hartford’s Clark and SAND elementary schools.

The entire story is a great case study in how the corporate education reform industry is trying to destroying our public education system and how parents, teachers and communities can fight back.

School Choice or Extortion (By Wendy Lecker)

Driven by their Madison Avenue advertising mentality, the corporate education “reform” industry’s narrative seeks to convince our nation’s citizens that our public education system is failing,” parents need market-based “ school choice” so their children can escape dismal neighborhood schools.

A primary solution, according to these education reformers is to remove public schools out of the control of local community school boards and hand them over to boards made up of corporate leaders or even hand them over to private management companies.

As a result of this business first mentality, rather than properly fund neighborhood schools, officials in Chicago, Philadelphia, New Orleans, New York and even right here in Connecticut push a political agenda in which underfunded community schools are closed and replaced with privately-run “schools of choice.” In nearly every case, our most vulnerable children are the first to be excluded from these “new” schools, while the remaining students are faced with barely-trained, inexperienced and often temporary teachers.

One of the most interesting developments has been the fact that voters simply don’t buy the corporate education industry’s version of the world.

In a recent 2013 Phi Delta Kappan/Gallup national poll on public education, the largest majority of parents ever recorded gave their community schools a grade of A or B.

The fact is most parents do not think their schools are failing their children. The poll revealed that the majority of parents trust teachers. The most serious problem facing public schools, according to parents polled, contrary to claims by reformers, is the fundamental lack of adequate funding, with school overcrowding being the second most serious concern cited by parents.

Rather than close and replace their schools or fire their children’s teachers, the vast majority of parents in the United States want their schools funded sufficiently so they have the capacity to provide all children with the resources, services and support they need to succeed.

A powerful example of the clash between reformer rhetoric and parent reality can be found in Connecticut’s Capital City.

In recent weeks, parents from two community schools have risen up to successfully oppose proposals by Christina Kishimoto, Hartford’s outgoing “reform” superintendent, and Governor Malloy’s Commissioner of Education, Stefan Pryor to hand over their neighborhood schools over to private companies. Neither school community was consulted before the plans were developed.

The reformers initial proposal was to hand Hartford’s Clark Elementary school over to Achievement First, Inc. the charter school management company co-founded by Commissioner Stefan Pryor.

Almost 18% of Clark’s students have disabilities, and 15.2% are English Language Learners. Clark’s school governance council has begged the district, in vain, for additional resources, including teachers, a psychologist, a guidance counselor and basic school repairs such as a functional heating and cooling system.

Only 6.7% of Achievement First’s students have special needs, 6.7% are English Language Learners. Moreover, Achievement First has the highest rate of suspensions in the state for children under 6 years old, and has been investigated and cited for federal violations in mistreating students with disabilities.

Upon hearing of the proposed Achievement First takeover, Clark’s parents fought back.   They openly feared that their special needs children would “not have a place” at an Achievement First school.  One parent said “Our teachers work very hard and they love our kids.” Another remarked that when children do not listen, Achievement First suspends them. “Our teachers find a way to keep them in school, find out what is behind their [behavior].”  Noting the school was praised by the district in 2013 for its academic progress, a parent declared, “We didn’t ask for our school to be redesigned but only for supports to keep making improvements.”

In the face of the strong opposition from parents, the mayoral-controlled majority of the school board backed down.

The same scene recurred about a week later.  This time the Hartford BOE was presented with a plan to hand the SAND elementary school over to Steve Perry’s new private management company. Perry currently heads Hartford’s Capital Prep Magnet School.  Kishimoto and Pryor tried to shift both SAND and Capital Prep to Perry’s company.

At Capital Prep, 6.3% of the students have disabilities, 3.4% of the students are English Language Learners, and 51.4% are eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.  Mr. Perry bills Capital Prep as a “no excuses” school. The school has a high attrition rate for teachers and students; and allegations of bullying abound.

Mr. Perry has been absent for almost 20% of the year so far, traveling and giving speeches. In one speech, he claimed that public schools are “over-feminized.”

In SAND school, 14.9% of the children have disabilities, 21.4% are English Language Learners, and over 95% of the children are eligible for free-or-reduced-priced lunch.

Parents came out to contest the “hostile takeover” of their school. One student claimed that “Capital Prep does not understand the [SAND] students” and feared that Capital Prep would “kick [neighborhood kids] out.” Another remarked that “We know these teachers and they know us.” He continued,” If you want kids at SAND to learn better, give kids the same support you do at fancy schools like Capital Prep. If I had fifteen kids in my classroom and two teachers, I would learn better too.”

The school board backed down again.

But this retreat may only be temporary. The school board subsequently met in private, in executive session, and emerged with another “turnaround plan.” Digging up an obscure law, the board suggested finding a school to become a “lighthouse” school.  A lighthouse school is an existing school that is “redesigned” to have a specialized curriculum and be open to intradistrict and interdistrict choice.  Such a school would be eligible for additional funding if it is subjected to this “redesign.”

According to approach being taken by the corporate education reformers, the only way parents will get more resources for their inadequately funded schools to acquiesce to a redesign- a redesign that will necessarily disrupt their school community – fire teachers, exclude children.

But of course, that is not really school choice- in the real world it’s called extortion.

It remains to be seen whether Hartford officials will listen to parents- those who know best what their children need. If they don’t, as one parent reminded Hartford officials- “We voted you in. We can vote you out.”

You can read the piece in the Stamford Advocate here:



Capital Prep’s Steve Perry responds to defeat tweeting – “there will be head injuries”

Moments ago, Instead of walking the halls, working with his staff or supporting students, Steve Perry has, once again, turned his back on his 500 students and returned to his twitter account.

At 9:33 AM Steve Perry tweets:

Dr. Steve Perry‏@DrStevePerry

“The only way to lose a fight is to stop fighting. All this did was piss me off. It’s so on. Strap up, there will be head injuries.”

Head injuries?

Did he say “head injuries?”

A public employee, on the job, responsible for the safety of 500 students just tweeted — “Strap up, there will be head injuries.”

Does he mean Hartford’s Mayor and the Board of Education members who voted to defeat his proposal?

Does he mean the students and parents of SAND elementary school?

Does he mean the Hartford Federation of Teachers and other Hartford teachers who spoke so eloquently at the Hartford Board of Education meeting last night?

Does he mean those of us who are out here speaking the truth and working to protect Connecticut’s students, parents, teachers and schools?

What the _____ does he mean — “Strap Up, there will be head injuries.” ???????

Can someone place a call to security or at least Hartford’s Superintendent of Schools, Christina Kishimoto.

Mr. Perry needs to be escorted to the door and put on administrative leave immediately before he does something really dangerous.

The power of parents and teachers crush a corporate education reform scheme

It could easily be presented as a modern adaptation of a one of Grimm’s fairy tales.  

The evil corporate education reformers target yet another local elementary school for closure and takeover through a bizarre scheme that would have allowed a public school principal to resign his position as a public servant, become president of his own private company and then take over control of both his old school and the new school.  The principal, who is known across the land for his bullying, sexist, anti-union tirades, appears unwilling to live by the rules that apply to everyone else.

But at the very moment that the children of the land face certain defeat, parents, teachers, the teacher’s union (known as the Hartford Federation of Teachers) and other public education advocates rally together to speak out on behalf of their children, the school, the importance of public education and what is right.

And in a stunning display of representative democracy, some of the community’s elected officials see the light, change their position and join together to save the school and defeat the corporate education reformers and their disastrous plan for domination.

But this time it is not a fairy tale.

It was a real event.

And it played itself out in Hartford, Connecticut at last night’s Hartford Board of Education meeting.

It a breathtaking example of good government, Hartford Mayor Pedro Segarra  and two of his appointees joined with long-time public education supporters Robert Cotto Jr. and Elizabeth (Brad) Noel to defeat a proposal that would have given Capital Prep Principal Steve Perry a no-bid, unique contract to run both Capital Prep and SAND elementary school.  The vote was reportedly 5 to 4.

As the Hartford Courant’s Vanessa De La Torre reported in an article entitled, “Hartford Magnet School Plans Rejected, SAND Proposal Dropped,”

“After hours of debate, the city board of education late Tuesday rejected two proposed magnet schools and declined to move forward with a controversial plan to turn over management of SAND Elementary School to a nonprofit educational group.

All three proposals were introduced as pieces of the state’s negotiated settlement with plaintiffs in the Sheff v. O’Neill desegregation case for the 2014-15 year. The board’s 5-3 vote will force parties back to the negotiating table.

One specific Sheff plan — one that would have allowed Capital Preparatory Schools Inc. to manage SAND and Capital Preparatory Magnet School — drew scores of supporters and critics to the Rawson School auditorium Tuesday night.

Capital Prep Magnet School Principal Steve Perry, a public speaker and author who has lambasted teachers’ unions, is listed in state corporation records as president of Capital Preparatory Schools Inc. Perry registered the company in February 2012.”

Neil Berry, the president of the PTO at SAND Elementary was extremely critical of the plan saying, “Our kids are not for sale” and telling the Hartford Board of Education not to hand SAND over to Perry’s “private entity.”

In classic fashion, rather than face the truth or even the notion that democracy has a role in American Society, Steve Perry blasted the Board of Education and the Hartford Mayor claiming that their action was somehow controlled by the local teacher’s union.  Perry told the Courant, “What we’ve done is again forfeited the needs of the children for jobs.”

This after Hartford Mayor Pedro Segarra announced that while he supported the Capital Prep school model, after hearing from the SAND Elementary School families, he didn’t think the plan should be “shoved down their throats.”

The two facts that stand out most from this event is that democracy still has a role in Connecticut and Steve Perry, the bully, can always be counted on to say the wrong thing at the wrong time.

The Hartford Courant article does an excellent job describing the events that took place at last night’s Hartford Board of Education meeting.  You can read the entire article here:,0,3033953.story

Connecticut Democratic Leaders stand by as the soul of Sheff v. O’Neill hangs in the balance

In an article entitled Hartford Schools To Consider New Management For SAND School, the Hartford Courant has just confirmed that the Hartford “board of education will consider three new school plans proposed as part of Sheff v. O’Neill negotiations, including a state request to have SAND Elementary School managed by a nonprofit educational organization.”

The Courant adds, “That group, Capital Preparatory Schools Inc., is led by Capital Prep Magnet School Principal Steve Perry. Under the proposal, which is set for a board vote Tuesday night, Perry’s organization would manage both SAND and Capital Prep schools beginning in the 2014-15 school year.”

If true, the move would serve as the nail in the coffin of the historic Sheff case, a lawsuit that like the great case of Brown vs. Board of Education gave rise to the belief that in the United States of America, separate educational institutions are not only inherently unconstitutional, but also un-American.

The notion that Capital Preparatory Magnet School and its Principal Steve Perry should be associated with reducing racial isolation is absurd.

Capital Prep and Steve Perry have shown a complete and utter inability to provide equal educational opportunities for Latino children, children who are not fluent in English and children who need extra help due to their special education requirements.

To hand the children and parents of SAND Elementary school to a new company owned and operated by Steve Perry not only makes a mockery of Connecticut law but undermines the fundamental goals of the Sheff v. O’Neill case.

The fact that this outrage could occur under a Democratic Governor, a Democratic Lt. Governor, a Democratic Attorney General and a Democratic General Assembly says volumes about the Democratic Party’s failure to live up to the true meaning of its historic mandate.

It is virtually inconceivable that Governor Malloy, his Commissioner of Education, Stefan Pryor and Attorney General George Jepsen would negotiate a Sheff settlement that was so damaging to the fundamental premise behind Sheff.

Greater racial isolation, discrimination against Latinos and disregard for those who require special education services is hardly what one associates with the legacy of the Democratic Party.

If Connecticut’s leading elected and appointed officials have signed off on this so- called “Sheff Agreement” then they have forfeited their rights to serve as representatives of the Democratic Party and its values.

As the Courant reports, the Hartford Board of Education’s approval would, “endorse those magnet programs and allow Superintendent Christina Kishimoto to negotiate a memorandum of understanding with Perry’s group to manage SAND and Capital Prep. Current students could stay at SAND, which would remain a Hartford public school but have outside management.

“Perry’s group” being a private company that Steve Perry formed out of his home in 2012 and then moved its address to Capital Prep, a public school building while he submitted the paperwork to become a “non-profit” charter school management company under the federal IRS code.  The charter school management company status would allow Perry to utilize federal tax credit laws to duck certain federal tax requirements.

The Courant story goes on to explain that Perry, who has called teachers roaches, condemned unions and last Friday told an audience in New Jersey that traditional schools had become overly “feminized” to the Courant that, “SAND employees would still be union members but would work under unique labor rules created for the school.”

But separate of Perry’s bullying, anti-teacher, anti-union, sexist approach and commentary is an even more serious failure to fulfill the intent of the Sheff v. O’Neill lawsuit.

Connecticut’s Democratic leaders have less than twenty-four hours to step in an explain the facts or Mayor Pedro Segarra and the Hartford Board of Education appear poised to finally destroy the lawsuit that was supposed to have been used to ensure greater equality and justice in our state.

Re-cap: Deal to give entrepreneur-principal Steve Perry his own school management company at public expense.

For quite some time, corporate education reformer and bully, Steve Perry, has been bragging about a plan to get the Hartford Board of Education to allow him to set up a private company and then hand him full control of what is now the Hartford Public School known as Hartford Preparatory Magnet School.

In fact, in the Hartford Board of Education files, there is even a proposal and recommendation from Hartford Superintendent Christina Kishimoto to do just that.

But action was never taken on Perry’s plan for domination.

However, Perry and Kishimoto have concocted an even more incredible plan and their goal is to force a vote of approval for their scam at tomorrow’s Hartford Board of Education Meeting.  Perry, the “entrepreneur-principal” as one reader calls him, is trying to pull off an unbelievable charade.

The details surrounding the effort were laid out in yesterday’s Wait, What? blog post entitled:     News Flash: Our Democracy at risk as Kishimoto/Poland set up “quick vote” to give Steve Perry sweetheart deal (updated)

But here is a re-cap of the key points

STEP ONE:  Perry sets up his own company on February 16, 2012 called CAPITAL PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INCORPORATED:  The corporate address is listed as his home in Middletown Connecticut and Perry is listed as the only officer. (See Secretary of the State website for details)

STEP TWO: Perry moves CAPITAL PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INCORPORATED’s address to a the Capital Prep school address, despite the fact that it is a Hartford Public School and state and Hartford law prohibits a public employee from using public resources to private business purposes.  Perry also registers CAPITAL PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INCORPORATED as a charter school management company for purposes of the federal tax code:

STEP THREE:  On Friday, the Christina Kishimoto, Hartford’s Superintendent of Schools releases the Board of Education Agenda for Tuesday afternoon’s Board meeting.


 B. Executive Session (Pending litigation: Sheff v. O’Neill)

7. Approval to Implement Anticipated Sheff Agreement (Dr. Kishimoto and Chairman Poland)

“That the Hartford Board of Education approves the conversion of the High School, Inc. to a Sheff magnet school starting with the 9th grade in 2014-2015 with expansion to grade 12 by 2017-2018; approves the creation of a new Partnership Magnet School with Capital Community College, the Capital Community College Senior Academy; authorizes the Superintendent to negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding with Capital Community College regarding the creation of such new school; approves the creation of SAND as a Lighthouse School Design, with a non-profit management organization, Capital Prepatory Schools (”CPS”), managing both SAND (“Capital Prepatory School II”) and Capital Prepatory Magnet School; and authorizes the Superintendent to negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding with CPS regarding its role in managing the schools on behalf of, and in conjunction, with the Hartford Public Schools.”

So with no public hearing, no input from parents, teachers, taxpayers or citizens, the Board of Education is scheduled to APPROVE – changing the structure of SAND Elementary and re-naming it “Capital Prepatory School II” and then giving both “SAND Elementary and Capital Prepatory” to a new “non-profit management organization (Perry’s company) and via a Memorandum of Understanding.

No public hearing

No public input

No participation, as legally required, by the school’s governance councils

No bidding process

Simply take two public schools and give them to a company set up by Steve Perry, a company with no officers, no Board of Directors, no experience, no financial standing….

If the Hartford Board of Education doesn’t stop this impending disaster, Steve Perry will be allowed to set up his own company and be given Capital Prep and Sand Elementary schools to run.

Period, end of story.

Even worse, because the move is “part of the Sheff desegregation settlement” it will make a mockery of the historic effort and the tens of million in public funds that have been spent to implement the Sheff settlement initiatives to date.

The Board of Education meeting is tomorrow – Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 5:30pm at the Sarah J. Rawson School at 260 Holcomb St., Hartford, Connecticut.

You can read more background here:

News Flash: Our Democracy at risk as Kishimoto/Poland set up “quick vote” to give Steve Perry sweetheart deal (updated)


Hey, let’s give Hartford’s SAND Elementary to Steve Perry to run…

Hey, let’s give Hartford’s SAND Elementary to Steve Perry to run…

Has Capital Prep’s Steve (No Excuses) Perry’s “experience” prepared him for the SAND Elementary School Community?

Let’s compare:

Experience with students facing language barriers:

% of students not fluent in English Capital Prep SAND Elementary
3.4% 21.4%


% of students going home to households where English is not the spoken language Capital Prep SAND Elementary
N/A 42.9%


Latino Students Capital Prep SAND Elementary
21% 65%


Experience with students needing special education services:

% of students not fluent in English Capital Prep SAND Elementary
6.3%% 14.9%


Experience with students facing extreme poverty barriers:

% of students eligible for free/reduced price meals Capital Prep SAND Elementary
51.4% 100%


Teachers:  Average number of years of experience in education:

% of students not fluent in English Capital Prep SAND Elementary
5.8 years 11.1 years


The fact is, Steve Perry is probably the LAST PERSON you’d want to be responsible for building a successful approach to improving educational achievement at SAND.

And yet soon-to-be-departing, Hartford Superintendent of Schools, Christina Kishimoto, couldn’t find a better person in the entire country to run SAND?

What kind of sick joke is this?

And what have the students, parents, teachers and SAND community every done to Kishimoto to deserve this kind of abuse?