Breaking News: State employee layoffs coming to UConn

Updated with statement from UConn spokesperson (see end of blog post)

According to high-ranking UConn administrators, who asked to remain anonymous due to concerns about retaliation, a series of layoff notices will be going out soon to state employees at the University of Connecticut, including unionized employees.

Despite a 6.5 percent increase in tuition and fees that have already been approved for next year, inadequate state support will mean that a significant number of UConn employees will be receiving layoff notices, the first time there have been a substantive number of layoffs at the University in at least 20 years.

The UConn administrators report that the initial round of layoffs will be hitting the School of Law, the School of Social Work and at other major programs at UConn.

Governor Malloy’s record cuts to Connecticut’s public institutions of higher education have already been taking a tremendous toll.  As the State of Connecticut reduces its state budget support for UConn, the Connecticut State Universities and Community Colleges, students and their parents are being told they must pay more and get less.

In a related move to cut spending, the Connecticut Board of Regents is blindly rushing to approve a “Transform CSCU 2020” plan that will dramatically diminish the Connecticut State University and Community College System.

The disturbing news of impending layoffs comes on the heels of the decision by Governor Malloy’s political appointees on the UConn Board of Trustees to dramatically increase UConn President Susan Herbst’s salary and compensation package.

Voting at a special board meeting on December 29, 2014, the UConn Trustees approved a new compensation package that will push President Herbst’s  salary to $831,000 by 2019.  Herbst’s new contract increases her salary by 5 percent each year and provides that the UConn Board of Trustees or a committee shall review her salary annually and may increase, but not decrease her compensation package.  In addition, Herbst will receive an $80,000-a-year “deferred compensation” payment, along with a $38,000 “supplemental retirement benefit.”  The new contract also promises her a $40,000 performance bonus each year and guarantees her two “retention bonuses” totaling $200,000, one in 2016 and one in 2019.

But when the Trustees met at the specially called meeting to approve the UConn President’s new compensation package, they failed to reveal that a plan to layoff state employees at the University of Connecticut was already taking shape.

The news that UConn is facing a massive budget crisis is not news, but the use of layoffs is in stark contrast to Governor Malloy’s campaign message, which was that if re-elected, he would not raise taxes or cut vital services and would not need to engage the State’s public employee unions in any negotiations about concessions.

The state employee unions used that commitment to support a massive political effort that helped Malloy beat his Republican opponent by about 40,000 votes.

Despite Malloy’s rhetoric, state employees, including those at UConn, will be feeling the devastating impact of the projected $1.4 billion budget deficit in next year’s state budget.

As the CT Mirror reported last March, “The University of Connecticut is facing a $46.2 million budget deficit for the fiscal year that begins July 1 — a 4 percent shortfall in the funding needed to continue existing programs.”

The CT Mirror added, “Further tuition increases, cuts to research funding, scaling back financial aid and stalling faculty hiring have not been ruled out to close the gap, a university spokeswoman said.”

According to reports produced by the University of Connecticut, State funding for UConn has decreased by more than $55.3 million a year since Malloy took office.

The Malloy budget cuts take the University of Connecticut back to 1995 when a New York Times article entitled, “UConn Plans Tuition Rise And Layoffs,” reported that, “Tuition at the University of Connecticut will rise 10 percent in 1994-95 and some part-time faculty members will lose their jobs this fall, the school’s trustees have decided.”

The New York Times added, “This is the sixth consecutive year that the university has called for a double-digit tuition increase. Over five years, tuition has doubled and the university has trimmed about one-fifth of its faculty and staff.”

In 1995, the State of Connecticut provided a block grant to the University of Connecticut that covered 32 percent of the University’s total operating budget.

Thanks to Malloy’s on-going cuts, the State of Connecticut’s operating grant now only provides 18.7 percent of UConn’s total operating costs.

It has been twenty years since those disastrous cuts, yet the on-going lack of state support for the University of Connecticut is jeopardizing the quality of the University and putting a UConn education more and more out of reach for Connecticut families.

As noted previous, the result of these constant budget reductions has resulted in a tremendous shift onto the backs of students and their parents.  The cost of tuition, room and board for an in-state student has at UConn has gone from $9,784 in 1995 to $23,496 this year.

And now UConn students are being told that although they will need to cough up 6.5 percent more to go to the University of Connecticut next fall, they can expect fewer staff and reduced programs.

In response to a request for a comment, UConn spokesperson Stephanie Reitz issued the following statement, it provides an interesting spin on how the University is going to explain the upcoming cuts.

“At this time, any workforce reductions at the university are very limited in number, affecting very few employees, and are due to reorganizations within a particular office, department, or school, not because of financial need or any reduction in state support.”

  • cynic

    The law school has an 1:11 rate of faculty to students. The majority of faculty do not teach in the schools clinics where ratios of faculty to students need to be that low. Since each tenure track professor there is probably making north of 200K, laying off 5-10 out of 46 could probably close any budget deficit that existed.

    Connecticut currently has a surplus of law graduates as compared to positions that are available for graduates.

    https://lawschooltuitionbubble.wordpress.com/original-research-updated/law-graduate-overproduction/

    In 2011 there was 2.7 graduates for every new job position that required a JD degree and bar passage.
    Both UCONN and Quinnpiac could reduce the numbers of their graduates without hurting the availability of legal services in CT.
    Additionally it would be more efficient to fund legal aid to hire several dozen more lawyers directly, then to attempt to graduate the current level of JD’s and hope they found their way into non-existant paid public interest law jobs.
    That being said, it would also be better if the state legislature finally lifted the curtin on the UCONN foundation and changed the law to have them covered by our state’s version of the FOIA. I suspect there is a mountain of waste that this organization has been concealing.

  • buygoldandprosper

    Fewer attorney’s.
    Fewer newspapers and reporters.
    Fewer campaign finance laws and regulations.
    Fewer regulations allowing transparency.
    Dan has a plan all right, unlike the other guy.

    .

  • Orville Reddenbecker

    Oh Jonathan, your beloved UCONN will survive. They currently have a administrator to student ratio of 1:18, while CSU has a ratio of 1:36. Students at CSU are not suffering and neither will UCONN students if the state lays off a few administrators there. In a couple of administrative departments that I am aware of on CSU campus’, 23% of FT staff have been cut since 2008 (no layoffs, attrition, retirement). 21% of the budget for some of these departments have been cut (not counting the staff values) and this is with 3 increases in minimum wages, which govern all student labor on CSU campus’, and they depend on student labor to run the place now! While CSU campus’ cannot stand any more trimming in my opinion, it would appear that UCONN has some fatty tissue that is not healthy for the state budget, or for UCONN.

    • jonpelto

      Do you think it will be the high-priced administrators who will get laid off? If so send out the layoff notices, but from the list that I saw there wasn’t a high-priced administrator among the names. while some of the observations about the law school and The number of lawyers in the state are correct, the layoffs at the law school I’m not associated with that issue and wild the university is claiming that the layoffs are very limited, the real truth is that The University of Connecticut will be making significant cuts and programs and services and laying off employees as a way to balance the budget. The administrator bloat is a fair issue but I assure you that is not what is behind this maneuver.

      • 00000000001

        Jon- Don’t all state agencies suffer from administrator and management bloat? I say, if Malloy’s administration got serious about trimming back the bloat, the state budget can easily shrink by $100M. When lower titled state employees aren’t replaced, then the remaining employees can look forward to a heavier work load and cross-training. Do the same to management.

  • Bluecoat

    Well,

    For those who follow Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit.com, you will know, He has been righting about the decline in College enrollment, especially within Law Schools across the country.

    He has a book out called ‘The New School” which explains the problems.

    College has become unreachable for many people, due to the increased costs and overhead of the bureaucracy as some have noted above.

    From one of Glenn’s posted stories:

    “For the past four years, virtually every law school in the country has been faced with a choice: lower admissions standards, shrink the entering class size, or some combination of the two. As I have previously noted, 95% of law schools have demonstrably lowered their standards and probably the real number is pretty close to 100%. This can be seen not only by the declining LSAT numbers of entering students, but also in the fact that enrollment has not declined at the same rate as the decline in applications.”

    “The single biggest cost of running a law school is personnel salaries and benefits , and the largest expenditure is for faculty salaries. While faculty salaries can be frozen, it is very hard to reduce salaries because of tenure rules. Many law school faculties are top heavy with baby boom era senior full professors who are bringing in very high salaries, often double or more than what an entry level professor makes. Few schools have mandatory retirement rules.” – David Frakt

    http://www.thefacultylounge.org/2015/01/cost-cutting-in-an-age-of-declining-law-school-enrollment.html

  • Bluecoat

    I meant to write Glenn Reynolds has been right about the problems of declining Law School admissions….

  • Bluecoat

    In General, this is what happens when we lower the standards with Common Core Standards, or whatever trendy thing is in place, and in conjunction, lower the college entrance exams so that more “college and career” ready high school kids go to college, whether they are ready or not.
    I believe we have a pilot program here in CT to align the entrance exams to the Common Core…..