Last bipartisan legislative call for a resignation – was about John Rowland.

8 Comments

The latest development in the “Regent-gate” situation was the press conference yesterday afternoon in which the Democratic and Republican leaders of the General Assembly’s Higher Education Committee demanded the resignation of Robert Kennedy, the President of the Board of Regents for Higher Education.

Meanwhile Kennedy continued to apologize and claim that he had mistakenly authorized pay raises for 21 members of the Board of Regent’s executive staff, despite the fact that the new law creating the Board of Regent system is absolutely clear that only the full Board has the authority to approve compensation issues.

Governor Malloy, who recruited Mr. Kennedy, also blasted him at various points yesterday, but did not demand that he be fired, nor did he call for his resignation.

The Board of Regents has a previously scheduled board meeting at 2:30 p.m. today where one would expect that issue to be added to the agenda.

While the bi-partisan call was only targeted at Mr. Kennedy, Republican leader John McKinney also demanded the resignation of Michael Meotti, the Executive Vice President for the Board of Regents.

A week ago, the CTMirror broke the news that Meotti had received a $49,000 pay raise this year, despite a prohibition on any pay raises as part of the Malloy-SEBAC state employee agreement.

This week the controversy spread dramatically when it was discovered that a total of 21 employees of the Board of Regents had received pay raises totally about $300,000 a year.

To date, State Representative Roberta Willis is the only Democratic leader to demand that the Board of Regents also, “look at Meotti and his role” in the decision to hand out the raises.

Considering that a number of senior administrators at the Board of Regents are experienced in Connecticut law, it is inconceivable that Mr. Kennedy could have made the decision without the input and advice of his leadership team.

Considering Meotti was a popular former Democratic State Senator and a close ally and friend of both Governor Malloy and Lt. Governor Wyman, it’s not surprising that most Democrats would be hesitant to publicly demand the investigation be expanded to include people beyond Mr. Kennedy.

As the Courant article noted, as late as Wednesday night, it appeared that Governor Malloy and the Chairman of the Board of Regents were positioning themselves to accept Kennedy’s apology, but stand by him.

However, the unexpected and particularly strong statements coming from the Higher Education Committee, and the growing recognition that the law related to pay raises for employees of the Board of Regents was very clear, the overall tone on Thursday changed and it has become increasingly clear that Kennedy’s level of support is quickly eroding.

One of the strangest developments, to date, was the attempt by Andrew McDonald; the Governor’s Chief Legal Counsel, to claim that the decision as to whether Kennedy should stay or go was really out of the Governor’s hands and that Governor Malloy could only recommend the Board of Regents investigate and take action if appropriate.

Apparently Attorney McDonald was not asked or reminded that Governor Malloy did not only recruit Mr. Kennedy, but he appointed 9 of the 15 members of the Board of Regents.  In addition, there are five ex-officio members of the Board, all of whom serve as Malloy’s commissioners to various state agencies.

Those who enjoy betting on the odds might do well to put their money on an announcement later today that Mr. Kennedy has decided to resign, so that, “the powers that be,” can focus all of their attention on protecting the other senior employees at the Board of Regents, including Mr. Meotti.

Be Sociable, Share!

  • perturbed

    Where’s Malloy’s sense of responsibility to enforce the ethical high standards of public servants now? Many low-level state employees were terminated and their lives put through hell for no worse judgement — *and the misappropriation of far less public funds* — than Kennedy’s. A low level state employee wrongly applies for a few hundred bucks in DSNAP coupons and they get fired and their pensions yanked, but Malloy’s crony wrongly dolls out over a quarter million dollars and is not summarily dismissed? (And the working stiffs didn’t even have spare houses in Minnesota they could retreat to.)

    This is truly disgusting.

    –perturbed

    PS: Jon, do you know if Kennedy will receive a CT state pension for all his hard work and dedication?

    • jonpelto

      Not a connecticut pension but we will make a significant payment into his alternative retirement program. I’ll find out how much,

      Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

  • buygoldandprosper

    Perhaps he can retire remotely and keep his big fat paycheck that Dan Malloy arranged??

  • buygoldandprosper

    Michael Meotti…he has a UnitedWay mentality. Very much like Big Dan’s wife,these folks actually think that it is OK to have administrative costs of 15% or more…and who better to benefit than the administrators?
    It doesn not hurt to have family connections either…

  • buygoldandprosper

    Another Kennedy bites the dust…only this one leaves in shame.
    “Bob’s decision is the right one.”–BigDanMalloy
    Nice work Dan. He fell on the sword for you.

  • EdLeadershipcrisis

    Kennedy just resigned…..any others? Might a few new regents be in order too?

  • EdLeadershipcrisis

    Being the immediate past Higher Ed commissioner, Meotti should have known better. His credibility to lead is now even lower than Kennedy’s, and he should resign too. Further, didn’t some regents know about this? Chairman Robinson, all of this a surprise? Really?
    But there is more……a coordinated “sweep under the rug” of an expensive state-issued car to Kennedy that was “totalled” on private use. Rumor was that Kennedy’s relative was driving it while on vacation when accident occurred. Can anyone FOI the BOR insurance and other relevent property records over the past 15 months and look into it and determine if this is true and, if so, who in the central office, board of regents, and Governor’s office knew about it? Was he given another car? Do the state auditors examining the 11-12 books know about this? Were procedures put in place to prevent such a thing from re-ocurring?
    Also, see article at http://www.thehour.com/news/norwalk/board-of-regents-decisions-a-recipe-for-disaster-says-former/article_ade6103d-3bb1-5561-84f8-f5c72287ce7b.html
    Sounds like system administrators and some regents members are not doing their jobs. We need more inquisitive regents that will elevate the system while maintaining its accessible characteristic. The sytem can do both at the same time, contrary to the belief of some regents. More changes are in order both at the top of the adminstration and at the governing body level. All appointees to this board from both sides of the political aisle must be re-evaluated.