October 17th – National Letter Writing Campaign To the President for Our Public Schools

14 Comments

Those who read Diane Ravitch’s blog already know that Diane, and some of her readers, are organizing a letter writing campaign to President Obama.  The goal is to get as many letters to the President as possible on October 17th and October 18th.

The letters are a way to push back on the “education reform” changes that are being pushed at the national level and in states across the nation.

They can specifically address a particular “reform,” such as the absurd standardized testing frenzy or you can take a broader perspective on the need to promote positive developments in public education in the United States.

At the end of this email is a very thoughtful example that one teacher wrote it.  Other examples can be found on Diane’s website or click http://dianeravitch.net/?s=October+17

Anthony Cody, another pro-public education blogger has offered to help coordinate the campaign.  As you’ll see from the instructions, letters can be sent to Diane, Anthony or directly to the White House.  Wait, What? readers are also welcome to send the letters to me or paste them into the comment section and I will format them and send them on to Diane. My email is [email protected]

Here is Diane’s latest blog post on the October 17th effort.

Our campaign is meant to include everyone who cares about public education: students, parents, teachers, principals, school board members, and concerned citizens. We want everyone to write the President and tell him what needs to change in his education policies.

Tell your friends about the Campaign. Ask them to join us. If you have a blog, write about it. Wherever you are, spread the news. Join us.

Here are the instructions:

You can send your letter to Anthony Cody or to this blog.

Or you can send it directly to the White House, with a copy to me or Anthony.

Anthony will gather all the emails sent to him and me and forward them to the White House.

1. Email your letters to [email protected]

2. Or submit them as comments to this blog. You can respond to this post or to any other post on this blog about the October 17 Campaign for Our Public Schools.

All letters collected through these two channels will be compiled into a single document, which will be sent to the White House on Oct. 18.

In ADDITION to this,

3. You can mail copies of your letters through US mail to The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 20500

4. You can send them by email from this page: http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/submit-questions-and-comments

If you choose to write or email the White House, please send us a copy so we can keep track of how many letters were sent to the President.

One more thought: when you write to the President, also write to your Senators and Congressman or -woman and to your state legislator and Governor. Send the same letter to them all.

Let’s raise our voices NOW against privatization, against high-stakes testing, against teacher bashing, against profiteering.

Let’s advocate for policies that are good for students, that truly improve education, that respect the education profession, and that strengthen our democratic system of public education.

Let’s act. Start here. Start now.

Join our campaign. Speak out. Enough is enough.

Diane

Here is a great example of a letter that one teacher wrote

Dear President Obama,

I am teacher and a lifelong Democrat. I have voted in every presidential election since I was old enough to vote. I’m certainly not going to vote for Mr. Romney but for the first time in my adult life I am considering not voting at all. I can not in good conscience support the educational policies espoused by you and your Secretary of education, Arne Duncan. I know many teachers who are facing the same crisis of conscience. When you ran for president four years ago, I like many of my colleagues, were full of hope that you might take measures to address the negative outcomes that were the result of the No Child Left Behind mandates. Instead, The Race to the Top, standardization, and privatization are destroying our public schools.

Although I agree that teachers should not be evaluated by test scores, this is not my principle concern. Inside the school building, there are three stakeholders. The students, the teachers and the administrators. A wise middle school principal of my acquaintance has pointed out that the students should always be considered first, the teachers second and the administrators third. When so much time is being spent on teaching the student how to do well on standardized tests, can it truly be argued that we are putting the student first? Bloom’s revised taxonomy suggests that there are six levels of learning. The bottom of the pyramid starts with remembering and then moves upwards to understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and finally creating. At best, standardized testing might measure the bottom two skills. The united States has always been recognized for its innovation and creativity. Do we really want our teachers to ignore the top four learning skills in order to conform to a “one size fits all” concept that doesn’t recognize student abilities, interests and needs. The other major stakeholder in education is our students’ parents. We are seeing more and more of them who are expressing dismay at what we have to do to keep from becoming a school in need of improvement. Many are seeking alternatives such as Waldorf Schools where students are treated as creative human beings rather than as fodder for data. I come from a long tradition of teachers and even my own grandchildren are all going to a Waldorf School. My daughters’ families are willing to make personal financial sacrifices so that their sons and daughters will not be exposed to the standardization that was mandated by the Bush Administration and now yours.

I have been fortunate to witness the outcomes of student based learning. Students who are engaged in an environment where they may pursue some of their own interests blossom into true learners. Standardized testing is alienating not only our teachers but also, more importantly, our students. NECAP test prep is about the worst possible way I can think of to engage potential learners at the start of a new school year. I actually had a student suggest to me that we should find a way to fill a bucket with what is on the tests. Then we should bore a hole in the students’ heads and pour the contents of the bucket into the hole. Is this how we want our students to see education?

The Common Core Standards may very well be useful guidelines but they do not teach the students to infer. Interpreted literally, they are fostering a mentality coming from the top down that each teacher must cover the same material at exactly the same pace and during the same time period. Most teachers don’t believe in this methodology but they are afraid to speak up in fear of losing their jobs. The top levels of the taxonomy are being lost to what appears to be an effort to make everyone be the same. 21st Century learners need to be creative problem solvers, not mindless automatons. Studies have shown that formative assessment is much more effective than summative assessment and yet we spend an inordinate amount of time on cumulative assessments that address only the lower levels of learning. As one educator has said,”Rigor is not giving the students difficult stuff, it is the quality of the feedback.” The feedback from standardized tests is not high quality. Noam Chomsky from MIT has pointed out that it is not what is covered that is important, it is what the student discovers that matters.

Mr. President and Mr. Duncan please realize that your present policies are not only demoralizing teachers, these policies are also doing our students a great disservice. Those of us who choose to teach do it not for monetary reward. it is however not unreasonable to assume that we should be able to earn a respectable professional income. We don’t work to win monetary recognition for high test scores. Doing so does not set a good example for our students. Bribing our students to do well on the tests is also not a good model for future adult behavior.

I want to support you on November 6 but I don’t know if I can. Do we really want a society where only the students who go to private schools will be the creative thinkers of the future? Education is not a basketball game. The Race To The Top only creates a few winners and many losers. The losers are also the future of our country. Please listen to those of us who have devoted our lives to helping our students become lifelong learners and thoughtful productive citizens in a free society. Diversity, not standardization is what has brought out the best in the United States of America.

Be Sociable, Share!

  • jschmidt2

    Unfortunately cursive writing and it appears spelling is something that is no longer taught. The modern day dependence on computers make those functions old fashioned. However, a good speller can always pick up those item spell check misses and it reflects poorly on the writer. And as anachronistic as a written letter might be, it shows the reader how important the writer deems the receiver to be.
    Reform of itself is not bad as long as it doesn’t substitute more red tape for teaching. If public schools didn’t dumb down the curriculum and modeled themselves after private schools, that could be a winning formula. But as long as unions call the shots, don’t count on it.

    • Magister

      But that’s the crux of it. Public schools are not dumbing down the curriculum because they want to; they are forced to because of commands handed down from the non educators in charge, such as NCLB and its successor, RttT. Dumbing down and narrowing the curriculum is the result of high stakes testing, data mania, and applying market strategies to schools.

      Private schools are not entirely immune to this either. Since the economy tanked in ’08, I have witnessed an alarming lowering of standards, in the private schools I’m familiar with, in an effort to keep enrollment up.

      • jschmidt2

        Dumbing down has been happening since the 60s when the
        liberals felt to make the world fair and to compensate for poverty, you need to
        lower the standards. Poor kids can’t perform so lower the standards. Instead of
        fixing the cause of poverty, which is a bad education, they made it worse by lowering standards. So now we have remedial courses in college. Testing hasn’t
        helped since now the teachers teach to the test. But testing was a knee jerk
        reaction to getting teachers to perform because local districts had problems
        with at that thanks to the generous benefits of tenure which make it nearly
        impossible to get rid of bad teachers. This is what the public hears about and
        has given teachers a bad rap. If the unions were interested in the kids they
        would be helping to get rid of bad performers so it would be how the public identifies
        teaching.

        And with the unions it is always for the kids. Well it isn’t
        for the kids as we saw in Chicago. It is for the power of the union. That is
        the only driving force of union leadership.

      • Linda174

        Clearly your mind is made up, but you are seriously misinformed. I think I have no choice here but to leave one behind.

      • guest

        Let me enlighten you jschmidt2. The unions did not bring public education NCLB and RttT. The first a forced mandate from a republican president, the latter a coerced mandate from a neo-liberal president. The unions did not negotiate the lowering of standards, the politicians forced them upon the schools. Show me some proof you pompous ass and enlighten me how teachers unions brought us these standards. If you can’t I suggest you shut the hell up!

      • jschmidt2

        You want to insult- well identify yourself

      • jonpelto

        There has to be ways to have intense discussions with using words that insult or could be interpreted as insulting. I’m going to start giving out gold stars to people who can deliver strong arguments without insults and red checks to “insulters”. – followed by being sent to the reorientation room! Okay?

        Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • jschmidt2

        good idea- civil discussions and exchange of ideas too often degrade into insults.

    • Linda174

      If you are also referring or reflecting on this letter writing campaign, I am lost after reading your post. This is a grassroots movement with parents, teachers and students writing to our president. Your stereotype or preconceived notions in reference to unions leads me to believe you are misinformed. Please consider reading a short piece written by a student in reference to NBC’s attempt to create an education dialogue primarily controlled by corporate privatizers and please read the background on the CORE (coalition of rank and file educators) movement in Chicago. Teachers have a wealth of information in reference to teaching and learning.

      I hope that you choose to read with an open mind.

      Mis-Education Nation: Why Were Student Voices Silenced at NBC’s Town Hall?

      http://www.good.is/posts/mis-education-nation-why-were-student-voices-silenced-at-nbc-s-town-hall/

      Karen Lewis, Street Fighter
      Obstreperous, loud, and unscripted, the Chicago Teachers Union president led the city’s public school teachers to strike against Rahm Emanuel’s reform agenda—and became a national figure overnight. Who is this person?

      http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/November-2012/Karen-Lewis-Street-Fighter/index.php?cparticle=1&siarticle=0#artanc

  • buygoldandprosper

    How about a letter regarding this?
    http://www.ctmirror.org/story/17671/double-digit-raise-goes-top-higher-ed-official
    For every feeble grass roots effort,Dan and the corrupt powers-that-be, buy influence and votes with tax dollars. When I read this garbage I wonder why I even care about the general population. We deserve what we get in this state…and the politicians know it.
    Too bad we do not have an Attorney General in this state who will work for a living.

    • jonpelto

      Seems like the mirror forgot to check – Meotti grew up with Malloy, story goes Meotti’s brother was Malloy’s best friend.

      Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

    • Apartheid First

      Thanks for alerting us to this. I’m sure no one has forgotten the extra $100 grand or so Elsa Nunez got when when she was named one of the CT Board of Regents Vice Presidents. http://www.ctregents.org/newsroom/board_formally_names_vice_presidents Nunez made sure to support Malloy’s Ed Reform bill loudly on that same day, and now she is looking to make ECSU a beacon for “gap closing” academics. Nunez goes way back with BoR Prez. Robert Kennedy–all the way to a university in Maine, along with Nunez’s husband, Richard Freeland–who is now Massachusett’s State Commissioner of Education. Seems like a cosy group, no? You approve my raise, I’ll approve yours; you hire my people… etc.
      The CT Mirror should be looking a bit more closely at this Board of Regents. Oh, and Eastern is like American Idol these days. Hardly a day goes by that they aren’t nominating themselves for some award or other. I’m sure their PR people are being richly compensated.

      • Magister

        Meanwhile, right across the street, Windham high implodes and fragments under its Special Master.

  • F. Gunther

    Dear President Obama,

    I have donated to your campaign and was elated when you were
    elected. While it is difficult to
    support your opponent, I can no longer support you and your support of Race to
    the Top. The bullying of teachers
    continues, people are getting rich off these reinvented schemes and teachers
    are no longer able to teach with any degree of integrity. As for DATA, just look at the scandal in
    Texas. Do you really think that is the
    only place manipulation of DATA is occurring?
    Districts are top heavy with administrators in order to institute the
    Evaluation Plans and some states are becoming “Police Like States” with local
    elected officials having no say. This is
    democracy? You really need to look at
    who is advising you and look to the likes of a Diane Ravitch. Although the teacher unions may endorse you,
    there are many teachers who are disappointed in your stand on education and the
    people you have chosen to listen to. I
    will not vote for you unless I hear that you are hearing what we are saying.

    F. Gunther