Team Vallas: Saving money by giving the same standardized test to 9th, 10th and 11th graders?

15 Comments

In order to understand things correctly, we have a question for Team Vallas.

As we have come to learn, you all, as the experienced “education reformers” among us, believe that more standardized testing leads to an environment in which students will learn more.

With that as one of your guiding principles, Team Vallas determined that Bridgeport students would be better off if they took three additional rounds of standardized tests, plus the State of Connecticut’s own standardized tests.  I think the way it was explained was that starting this year, Bridgeport schools would conduct three sets of “CMT like tests,” in addition to the “CMTs.”

Round #1 was aptly named the Benchmark Assessment Test.

Teachers, students and parents in grades 3-8 were informed that Bridgeport’s new standardized testing would begin on October 1st, while students in grades 9-12 would begin their testing October 3rd.

An announcement also went out to parents telling them that, “they could contact their children’s schools to obtain results once testing is completed.”

In addition, to ensure that no cheating took place, Team Vallas instituted a sophisticated anti-cheating system that included making sure that the tests were locked up at all times and deploying proctors as warranted.

But now a question has arisen.

After speaking with a number of Bridgeport students and teachers today, it has become apparent that all 9th, 10th and 11th grade students were given the exact same “Editing & Revising” test.

Meaning, despite the fact that grade level curriculum and proficiency levels are very different in grades 9, 10 and 11, students in all three grades were required to read the same passages and answer the same exact questions.

This new development was certainly unexpected and raises the following inquiries;

(1)   Did the Bridgeport school system get a better price from the multi-million dollar testing company by allowing it to provide the same test to multiple grade levels?

(2)   They must charge less for correcting the test right?

(3)   Is this testing methodology some type of post-modern, neo-analytical mechanism to track students across multiple grade levels?

(4)   By utilizing the same test year after year, do you find that student’s test scores go up, thereby proving that “education reforms” are actually working, after all?

(5)   Can you point out other school districts that have utilized this rather unique approach to standardized testing?

Or (6) was this some type of colossal mistake?

 

Be Sociable, Share!

  • http://twitter.com/nora9999 Nora Matthews

    VERY interesting.

  • Linda174

    How many thousands are spent each day paying these Spinaround hucksters and they can’t even coordinate the distribution of test booklets? Maybe they have lost track since they give tests every two weeks. Good grief….once again if we ran our classrooms the way they pretend to “reform” the entire district would be even more chaotic.

    And yup….the teachers are the reason for our failing schools.

    Can Vallas leave earlier than planned please? Hurricane anywhere? Tornado? Earthquake? We need a disaster soon!

  • Sleepless in Bridgeport

    colossal mistake………gimme a V, gimme an A, gimme a L, gimme another L, gimme another A, gimme a S. What do we got……..a disaster. What do we need? An exorcist.

  • BridgeportEducator

    I have heard from teachers that it was the same test as June.

  • Querculus

    Wow. “Saving” money isn’t the word I’d use.

    The leadership owes it to the educational community to explain this. Basic damage control.

    Sounds like the testing/ textbook company is dropping the ball on this—
    But b/c the Vallas Group consulting firm has so much riding on the perceived success of the testing, the Vallas team’s hands are tied.
    Even if they wanted to, they could not possibly blow the whistle on Houghton Miffllin Harcourt, since they’d be pilloried in the press and lose face in current situations elsewhere in the nation and with potential future clients.
    I think the same thing may be at play with the Follett barcoding issues.
    This is one of the real problems with Paul Vallas having irons in other fires around the nation, not just the nebulous issue of whether he has enough time to do the job. Perhaps the single-company-for-all approach is less a matter of buddy buddy contract steering, and more a matter of whatever’s quick and available. Getting text books, tests, software, etc from different companies takes time and thoughtful discussion.
    Hey, we all do what’s easy and convenient sometimes.
    Competitive bidding, multiple companies, real transparency, teacher/professional input… all these things would help avoid time and money wasters like this, But I do not believe that this model of absentee superintendency can sustain such activities.

    • Apartheid First

      Understanding and guessing are two very different things. I have to sit through more brainless idiotic meetings which all end with some version of Board members attributing various motives and desires to some other party, most frequently parents but sometimes teachers. It is frustrating and offensive, because it would not actually take that much time to ASK the parties involved, rather than “guess”.
      I’m all for directness. The blog seems to be posing questions that need to be answered.
      I am also puzzled about your characterization of “our own people”–being “political and friendly” is another one of your confusing couplings (like understanding and guessing)–you are linking disparate things.
      I don’t mean to quibble. In-fighting probably damages more causes, good and bad, than anything else. Maybe Vallas and Adamowski will have a cat fight one day soon.

      • Linda174

        You have lost your mind. How in world with a Vallas sychophant now know who you are? That is ridiculous!

        Many teachers post here from many schools and districts. We are all up on the reformy tricks in Hartford, Williminatic, Bridgeport and soon to be New London. A post or opinion left by those here does not identify where others work.

        You are using me as an excuse to bow out.

        Shame on you!

      • Linda174

        If a paid Vallas henchman is reading this they have too much time on their hands and they should have better things to do. However, if they are reading it they are nervous and paranoid…rightly so. I doubt they spend their time reading here and laughing. Usually it appears they backpeddle and place themselves in CYA mode.

      • jonpelto

        Just checking the messages – didn’t realize that things had deteriorated like this. Friends, there are undoubtedly differences and issues between us all but the enemy is not on this side of the battle front. The enemy is across the way and that is where we need to focus our efforts. I’m going to go in and delete a bunch of messages – not because I don’t believe that everyone has a right to an opinion (even if it is right or even if it is wrong) but this just isn’t the venue that is appropriate. Okay – I hope you all understand.
        jonathan

    • msavage

      Nope, I don’t agree with you here. While I agree that it’s ridiculous to think that Vallas can do an adequate job in any one position with so many “irons in the fire,” I don’t think tis is a matter of “whatever’s quick and available.” I think the contract steering that you refer to is all about the money. It’s always all about the money.

      • Linda174

        One problem…we are not dealing with ethical people…they are the most unethical vultures in our society. It doesn’t matter..this is a set up for failure to take over your schools and get rid of as many of you as possible. First step…coming soon….mayoral control. Read chapter five in the Ravitch book. You either need to leave, become one of them or get ready to be sacrificed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ruthanne.baumgartner Ruth Anne Baumgartner

    Shameful. But, once bitten, I don’t trust consultants and self-styled experts anyway. Their agenda is not the educators’ agenda or the student’s agenda or the parents’ agenda. Work the system, deliver for whoever hired them. I don’t know why we don’t trust our own people to understand our own situation.

    • Querculus

      Here’s why: our own people are either too political and friendly with an in group to be effective and fair -or- too honest/ outspoken and aware of what’s going on to be appointed to positions of power. So in come the consultants. Which winds up being generally like the former option.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tommy-Burns/712565941 Tommy Burns

    Enough bull***t–enough banter—why I ask does no one on this blog start a lawsuit against GNEPSA–the process–Vallas–Adamowski—your(our) talk is cheap–we are not powerless–if laws have been broken–lets go—Ill lead –but I need more info on what laws have been broken—Jon–you are our beacon and I will be our hammer—no more talk —ACTION–ACTION–NOW—Jon–give me a call–860-227-6668—and thanks for all you do-Tom

    • R.L.

      Yes! Thank you.