A Petition to reduce the use of Standardized Testing in Connecticut

23 Comments

Friends,

It’s a Petition to reduce the use of Standardized Testing in Connecticut

This is our opportunity to make a difference.

The “education reformers” and their corporate partners are making their push to undermine and destroy public education.

Public school teachers are on the picket line in Chicago.  The strike is not the traditional battle over fair pay, as much as it is a about a group of courageous teachers, willing to standing up to the forces that see children as a vehicle for making money.

The reforms will say or do anything to deny their true intent.

But as noted earlier, in the greatest irony of all, it was Paul Ryan, the politician who can’t seem to ever tell the truth that actually explained what is happening in Chicago.

Yesterday Ryan proclaimed. “We stand with Mayor Rahm Emanuel.”

Adding moments later, he added, “We will stand with education reform…”

The one time Ryan tells the truth is to make it clear, the Chicago Teachers Strike is about our generation’s equivalent of the fight against the Military Industrial Complex.

There is a group of corporations, led by a group of “education reformers,” and backed by a group of Republican and Democratic politicians, all of whom are engaged in an effort to destroy public education, and hand the nation’s education system over to corporations and consultants, who can then make a huge amount of money.

The “reformers” weapon of choice is turning American public schools into standardized testing factories.  Despite the academic evidence that proves standardized testing doesn’t lead to educational achievement, the massive increase in the use of standardized testing is designed to make the educational industry rich…and it is doing just that.

In this era of scarce resources, where class sizes grow, students don’t have the supplies they need and “non-essential” courses like art, music, and foreign language courses are being canceled, the money being diverted to more standardized testing is skyrocketing.

From 2000 to 2015, taxpayers in the State of Texas will shell out $1.2 billion to the Pearson Corporation for developing and scoring standardized tests.

New York City plans to spend over half a billion dollars on technology in schools, not to ensure that children have access to computers, but to make sure that there are enough computers so that all students can take the new computer based standardized tests that are required under the Race to the Top Program.

George Bush’s “No Child Left Behind” program required over 17 different standardized tests, and the Bush/Obama “Race to the Top” program requires even more.

When Connecticut’s Governor, Dannel Malloy, introduced his “education reform” package last February, it included a proposal for a new standardized test for all 11th graders in Connecticut.

Halfway through the legislative session, Malloy uttered his now famous line; “I don’t mind teaching to the test, as long as the test scores go up.”

When the Connecticut General Assembly finished up with Malloy’s “education reform” package, the concept of a new 11th grade test was replaced with standardized testing in kindergartners, first grade and second grade.

Just this month, Paul Vallas, Bridgeport’s superintendent of schools, and education reformer extraordinaire, announced an unprecedented standardized testing assault on Bridgeport’s students and their teachers.

Paul Vallas unilaterally announced that starting this year, in addition to the two weeks of Connecticut Mastery testing that is required by the Connecticut State Department of Education, Vallas is ordering that all students in grades 3-11 complete three additional two-week rounds of standardized testing.

Students in Hartford already face this type of abusive policy.

The evidence could not be clearer.  Poverty, language barriers and percent of students who need special education services are the three greatest predictors of standardized test scores.  Faced with the challenge of confronting those issues, corporate “education reformers” say those problems can be resolved simply by adding more standardized testing and then using those results to inappropriately identify which teachers should be retained and which should be fired.

The logic of their strategy is beyond absurd.

Yet key leaders at the federal and state level, including Democrats, are pushing for a strategy in which the only beneficiaries will be the corporations that are salivating at the chance of getting the multi-million dollar contracts.

It is time for parents, grandparents and all of us who believe in the sanctity of a quality public education to stand up and enough.

And we can start by signing the attached is a petition that is sponsored by Parents Across Connecticut, and other organizations that are sick and tired of the politicians who are selling out our children, as a way to appease the corporate education reformers.

Please take a moment to sign this important petition.

Make sure you ask each and every one of your friends, families and colleagues to sign as well.

Us the power of social networking to make it clear to Connecticut’s elected officials that they  must stop the over reliance and standardized tests and shift those resources to programs that actually educate our children.

This is the moment to fight back.

It is the moment to stand up to those who want to privatize our schools.

It is the moment that we can begin to take back our government and our economy.

Sign the petition and then pass it on.

Thank you,

Jonathan Pelto

Click here: https://www.change.org/petitions/reduce-the-use-of-standardized-testing-in-connecticut

ALSO, PLEASE NOTE: While this petition is legitimate and will only be used in the effort to reduce standardized testing, carefully determine who is sponsoring any other petitions that pop up immediately after you sign this one or any other on-line petitions that are recommended to you. In the past, Michelle Rhee, the anti-public education activist, has posted innocent-sounding petitions, for example, anti-bullying petitions, that pop up. By signing those without realizing who is sponsoring them, people have had their names and contact information used by her organization. If you do not know the organization behind the petition, DO NOT SIGN it.”

Be Sociable, Share!

  • Linda174

    Yes, as soon as I signed up popped a “do you love teachers” petition. When you sign you are automatically counted as a “grassroots supporter” for the Rheeject. Do not sign any petition that pops up if it says Students First, Democrats for Education Reform, Stand for Children, etc…. Warm, Fuzzy Deceitful names that stand for privatization, at will employees, union busting and test prep factory schools.

    • jonpelto

      Yeah! Sadly this is the most effective on-line petition service and it is free but some national groups have figured out how to try and trick people who sign.

      Thanks for warning everyone.

  • Windham Guest

    That was definitely a petition worth signing!
    It would be great to present this to the State Board of Ed, and then to say, We are coordingating a state-wide Opt-Out of Standardized tests.
    Teachers have always tested students (that’s what school is all about)–and, guess what? The tests are often individualized; focused on the work at hand (unitl final, cumulative exams); adjusted to the child’s grade level; and used with scruple immediately by the teacher. Some wonks maintain that computers will soon be doing all that, but I’ll take the teacher anyday.
    Even animals–rodents–do not thrive with the most interactive computer. I am starting to think that the test-creators and the software inventors are leaving their humanity behind in their quest for ever more screen time for us all.

    • http://twitter.com/paulbogush Paul Bogush

      You don’t need to sign a petition and hope that some day testing will go away. Any kid in any public school in CT can go in, sit down, and not take the test. You can’t purposely stay out of school, but you can choose to show up and not take it with no penalty to the kid or school. If a certain % of kid do that the scores for the school become invalid.

      • Windham Guest

        But look at all the time wasted–”opting out” is not a long-term solution, just a short-term exigence! I *do* think the standardized tests should go. There might be some need for one occasionally–very occasionally, for some specific purpose. Some tests measure something. But the over-reliance! the rating of schools! the evaluating of teachers! All based on standardized tests? And we are fed this bill of fare by “reformers” like Steven Adamowski, who cannot even maintain their licenses, who demand waivers of certification for themselves so they can be superintendents etc. I actually think Adamowski would not pass even the most basic school administrator certification test–never mind some STEM test.

      • jonpelto

        So right Guest, as always!

      • Luis

        This is the story of my sister who “opted out” my niece two years ago. My niece was nervous about what the other students would say but did it and that was that. The next year, my sister gave my niece the option, and my niece chose to opt out on her own. We need to have workshops on this and empower people to make those choices themselves.

        http://www.realhartford.org/2011/08/31/back-to-school-guide-reclaiming-your-childs-education-12/

      • jonpelto

        Great idea! Count me in.

      • msavage

        That’s wonderful. I’m glad your niece made the decision to “opt out,” and for very good reasons. I will discuss this further with my little girl as the time for this year’s CMTs draws nearer. But I won’t push too hard and I certainly won’t force her to sit out the test. This is an issue where I feel she should be able to make her own decision based upon age-appropriate information.

      • Luv2Teach

        That’s awesome, Luis. You’re sister’s story really has be seriously considering opting-out both my CMT-aged children. I know one of them would do it with no problems (as long as I gave him the proper tools to handle the interrogations he will get), my youngest not so much, unless others joined. I may try to find others in my district willing to opt-out. There are only 2 years left of CMT, so what’s the point? Coincidentally, both of them received their scores from last year today. They were both at Goal and 1 was Advanced in writing. I know they’re learning and they’ll be fine… I don’t need this test to tell me so, or to be used to judge their schools or their teachers. Thanks so much for sharing this story.

      • http://twitter.com/paulbogush Paul Bogush

        You convince 25% of parents to let their kids sit it out and all testing comes to a halt. Easier to convince 25% of parents to let their kids opt out or get the edrefomers out of Pearson’s bed? Opting out is the quickest way. Yugos aren’t sold in the US anymore because people stopped buying them, not because people kept buying them hoping they would get better. Parents have no idea how much power they wield if they do the right things. I have seen 1% of parents who know the rules and jargon control the policy for the other 99%. Any kid does not have to be tested. Saying testing is bad and letting your kid take the test is a bit hypocritical no?

      • JMC

        I agree with you, Paul!

      • jonpelto

        This petition will provide a good list to reach out to about how one opts out.

      • http://www.facebook.com/melanie.savage.1610 Melanie Savage

        Here’s a problem that I’ve run into re opting out. I brought the idea up with my little girl (she is 9 years old). It made her nervous. She doesn’t want to be different than the other kids. She doesn’t want to stand out. I tried to explain to her on her level why I think the test is not worth taking. It didn’t make a difference. I’m not going to force her to sit out to make a point. It will be her decision, and right now she’s not comfortable with sitting out.

      • jonpelto

        Excellent point – it would need to be done in teams with enough parents that children wouldn’t be bullying.
        More research and thought is definitely needed

  • http://twitter.com/paulbogush Paul Bogush

    I wonder if the “less standardized testing” position waters down the real problem. It’s like saying give the guy on the electric chair a few less amps…

    Arguing for fewer standardized tests still puts you on the side of folks that believe that standardized tests matter.

    I realize you are not education…this is not directed at you…but it makes me sad that the education establishment’s best response to almost every current ed-reform idea is let’s just do less of it. No one speaks up with “here is what we should do instead….”

  • Luv2Teach

    Yay! Going in the right direction here..;) It kills me that we spend so much time and energy differentiating instruction for students (btw, the objective for today’s SI 1/2 day in Bpt “Write lesson plans with all components including differentiated instruction, so us suit & ties can look them over and decide what we like and you will do” – don’t get me started…:( all year! Differentiating, making our kids feel proud about their personal accomplishments, watching them grow, seeing their pride, pushing them, cheering them on, making them feel good about themselves…. Only to crush them by periodically throwing a “standardized, grade/age level appropriate, one-size-fits-all” test to ruin all the hard work, pride and self-esteem we worked so hard on. Now it doesn’t matter what we say to our students, they “feel” stupid when they are faced with tasks that are NOT at their level. The anxiety, the frustration, the motivation…crushed!

    ENOUGH with the Abuse!Just LET US TEACH!!

  • Magister

    Signed and posted on my Facebook for any of my friends who have not yet hidden my feed due to my constant edu-rheeform ranting.

    • jonpelto

      You are my hero! And if your friends have hidden your feed…. They ain’t your friends! J

  • http://www.facebook.com/melanie.savage.1610 Melanie Savage

    Petitions are lovely and all–but I think it’s going to take more than words on the page to fight these people. As I’ve been saying for months, I think it will take a massive show of bodies on the steps of the state capitol building to make a real impression. My opinion–petitions and figuring out how to approach politicians are both methods of working within the existing system. Sadly, it is a system that is no longer functioning. It is broken. Look at Dan Malloy–this is a Democrat? There is no representation any longer. What good does it do to try to work within the machine when the gears are broken? You can turn the gears all you want but if they’re not connected to other, functioning gears you won’t get very far.

  • http://www.facebook.com/melanie.savage.1610 Melanie Savage

    Just wanted to add–because there’s no way to edit a post–that I’ll certainly sign the petition and pass it on. I just wonder if these methods are the most effective use of time/energy.

  • begtodiffer

    All I know is that I am exhausted, trying to find the time to plan lessons that meet every child’s level, and one class right now has 36 students in it, thankyou Team Vallas, correcting papers and making sure there are meaningful comments on them to hang and display on a huge bulletin board, deal with behavioral issues that a psychiatrist would find both challenging and disturbing, making endless phone calls to parents who are already tired and stressed out trying to make enough income to support their households, placating a dictorial administration whose bottom line is endless data and testing…and let us not forget teacher evailuations…a system in place to make sure no teacher is left standing! Parents, please realize how damaging these standardized tests are for your children…opt out and please be patient with your child’s teacher. We all long for the day when we can actually TEACH and not be demonized by corporations and politicians….thank you.

    • Luv2Teach

      I feel your pain! There aren’t enough hours in the day to do everything they expect us to do! and yet we get up and go in every day!! And I could tell you it’s not for the money (duh;) it’s for MY STUDENTS who need me! Yet, like you say, we are still demonized by these people!