Comments on: Bridgeport Election Tuesday: What Excel Bridgeport failed to point out

By: Linda174

Linda174 — Sun, 02 Sep 2012 17:04:00 +0000

Their “donations” come with strings attached. We just don’t know what they are yet. They had to figure out how to make a profit before they could show their genuine concern for the poor brown child in Bridgeport. The long term goal is to destroy the public schools and privatize.

By: Castles Burning

Castles Burning — Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:41:00 +0000

Bravo!! So the business community did not raise all of the money promised and now they are starting a new fundraising program Good Schools Bridgeport so that they can continue the work already started. To me, it is hard to know to what extent we have “public schools” (if indeed they can be truly public with so much corporate agendas and financing) with so much “intervention” by “others.”

By: Castles Burning

Castles Burning — Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:41:00 +0000

P.S. Please do all you can to spread the word about the election.

By: Guest

Guest — Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:28:00 +0000

In addition, voters should ask Kelleher if she recused herself when George Coleman was paid off, I mean hired, to help implement professional development for the RESC in Fairfield County. He really needs the money, even with his lavish retirement.
Coleman served the state well, presiding as Acting Commissioner over the illegal state takeover of Bridgeport’s BoE and the other state takeover of Windham, via the appointment of the highly paid Steven Adamowski as Special Master.
Coleman was part of the coup that put those three democrats in place.
Moales is the beneficiary of public education dollars for his “faith-based” school.
I can’t believe that any of those illegally appointed BoE members can run at all.