Bridgeport‘s “Official” School Budget Finally Released: “Students with disabilities” cut the most;

14 Comments

Last week, we learned that the school budget that was included within Mayor Bill Finch’s proposed City Budget, was not, in fact, the official school budget.

Furthermore, the budget that the City Council held hearings on, was not, in fact, the official school budget.

We were even told that the budget that the City Council approved and has been posted on the City’s website was not, in fact, the official school budget.

According to Team Vallas, the Board of Education and the public are only now, two months after the start of the fiscal year, seeing the complete, official, education budget, for the first time.

That budget, aptly named the “2012-13 Operating Budget and Grants Budget,” was posted on the Bridgeport Board of Education website earlier today and will apparently, be a topic of discussion at tonight’s illegal Board of Education meeting.

Upon review of the “official” education budget, it remains apparent that the largest cut in the $225.2 million dollar budget are for funds allocated for those students who are receiving special education services.

Although there is no indication that number of students with disabilities has declined, Paul Vallas and his team have cut 14 Special Education teachers from Bridgeport’s school budget.

While the overall school budget is going up, this million dollar cut will reduce the number of teachers helping students who need special education services by 7 percent.  The only explanation that Team Vallas has articulated is that the savings are a result of an “updated allocation formula for resources/inclusion classes.”

A second, and even larger cut, has been made in the allocation of funds for students whose special education needs are so great, that they have been placed in alternative schools or other learning environments.

Bridgeport’s “official” education budget cuts more than $2.6 million dollars, or almost 20%, of all the funds used to place students with the greatest needs.

This means that Team Vallas is assuming that approximately 20%, or one out of every five students who have been placed in specialized setting, will be moved back into Bridgeport school system.

Such a change would require that Bridgeport revise each student’s IEP (Individualized Education Program), a process that is both complex, lengthy and requires full participation by all of the individuals and entities that are responsible for determining each child’s educational and social needs.

There is no indication that Team Vallas as begun such a massive rewrite of student’s IEPs or even that such a charade could be pulled off.

Not only does the “official” budget reduce the tuition for out-of-district placements by $2.6 million, but there appears to be no attempt to provide the additional resources that would be needed to care for those children, if they were moved back into the Bridgeport schools.

Meanwhile, the official budget contains numerous other changes that should raise concerns about the level of accuracy and honesty within the budget document.

For example, although the private account that was created to pay for Vallas’ salary has been drained and closed, the new budget assumes that the Fairfield County Foundation will, once again, donate $126,000 to help cover Vallas’ salary this year.  There is, however, no mention that the business community will provide the other $300,000 that they donated toward Bridgeport’s “turnaround” this year.

Not surprisingly, there was not a reduction to every line item in the budget.

The single largest percentage increase in the budget?

Well, that honor goes to the costs for outside counsel and additional lawyers.  The budget for additional legal assistance jumped 31 percent, bringing the total to over half a million dollars.

Last but not least, special notice should be given to the City’s pledge to increase funding for its schools.

When the year began, Mayor Finch spoke of a historic commitment to increase Bridgeport’s contribution to its schools by more than $10 million dollars.

By April, when the Mayor proposed his new budget, he said, “I am proposing a historic increase in education in the FY 2012-13 budget.  The City will provide the Board of Education with a $7 million increase, coupled with an expected $3.5 million from Governor Malloy. This is a $10.5 million increase in funding for the Board of Education for FY 2012-13. I believe this increase is necessary to reform our schools, and create an education system that can fairly educate the children of Bridgeport in this highly competitive world.”

The City Council then slashed Mayor Finch’s request by $2 million.

In the end, the City’s “new commitment” to their schools was down to $5 million.

And of that amount, $3,649,575 is actually the legally required increased due to the state’s Minimum Budget Requirement (MBR) law, a system that forces towns to maintain a basic minimum level of funding.

All the hoopla aside, Mayor Finch and the Bridgeport City Council’s “major commitment to education” amounted to less than $1.3 million in new funding, an “historic” increase of .6 percent.

Hopefully those who are attending tonight’s last meeting of Bridgeport’s illegal Board of Education will hear more about this “official” Bridgeport schools budget and can pass along their news to wait, what? readers.

Be Sociable, Share!

  • CP

    This is epidemic in Connecticut where the report card on SPED is atrocious. Having been through the wars on this issue, I can also say that complete disregard for the IDEA by districts is more often than not codified by the courts all the way through the Second Circuit. Parents who have the means just pay for the out placements themselves if they are smart- the rest get whatever they get and have very little recourse. To those who take on the fight, you have no idea what you are getting into or are up against. This is the most subjective and sleazy area of the law you will ever encounter. It is truly disgusting here with regard to this issue.

  • Sleepless in Bridgeport

    I must have missed something, but the usual announcement and agenda for tonight’s BOE meeting was not distributed by internal email. Oh what the heck……..they’re illegal so why not do everything illegally. The gov has given them a “Get out of Jail Free” card anyway.

    • jonpelto

      The old, if we don’t get it to people, most people won’t know they didn’t get it… http://www.bridgeportedu.com/Board/docs/2012-2013/SPECIAL_%20AGENDA08-27-12forWEB(2).pdf

      Some interesting items….

      Maybe Vallas can explain how he is providing a detailed budget for the first time – meaning what? They got a final budget without ever voting for a budget or they voted for a budget that wasn’t fine or in Bridgeport you don’t have to actually adopt budgets or the members of the illegal board gave Vallas their proxy so he could adopt a final budget with no one around.

    • Guest

      I have looked online and I haven’t been able to find an agenda for tonight’s meeting. Connecticut’s Freedom of Information law requires that agendas be made available on the district website at least 24 hours before the meeting. The penalty is interesting. For failing to follow FOI, the FOI Commission has the power to void any votes taken at a meeting.

      • jonpelto

        I don’t know when they posted it. Almost impossible to find. I just posted it to another comment – one agenda item is Vallas undewr an agenda item called update on district leadership.
        Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • Lorenzo

        I wasn’t sent one, either and I should have.

      • Guest

        By the way, forgetting to post an agenda (i.e., the old “blame the secretary trick”) is not an excuse under FOI. This is very serious stuff. As Lennie Grimaldi says, “Only in Bridgeport” can a board of education do something like this so unapologetically — and get away with it.

  • Charlie Puffers

    The same thing happened in Hartford a few years back. A guy named Romain Dallemand came in to run the sped program for the HPS. I think Adamowski brought him in. He put all sped kids back in the reg ed classroom on the first day of school. Sped staff met almost daily for the first month of school holding illegal PPT meetings and rewriting every students IEP. They were writing recommendations for students they didn’t know. These students had come from out of district, self contained or residential placements. Some of us surreptitiously put together a list of advocacy groups and gave it to parents. Parents that called and retained an advocate were able to get better services for their children. It was a mess for everyone else but Dallemand was able to pad his resume with some amazing statistics and land a supt job in Minnesota. Look at what he is doing now.

    http://www.13wmaz.com/comments/177984/153/Rochester-Minn-Pays-320000-to-Dallemand-Whistleblower

    • jonpelto

      Holy sh*t!

      Hopefully this time we can stop them before they get going…

      Or maybe we can just get big payouts for everyone!

    • Linda174

      That guy was also in Torringotn for a while…director of pupil personnel….seemed to be a bullshitter….no shortage of those in public school “leadership”.

  • Charlie Puffers
  • Lorenzo

    So far every special education teacher I’ve talked to has received none of the new reading or math materials (except a few lucky ones were were able to sneak some out for the training). No planning software, assessments, off-level student material, etc. Remember, teacher planning is 40% of our new evaluation system.

    It’s sabotage, I tell you.

  • Sue

    Paul Vallas balances Bridgeport’s education budget on the back of it’s most vulnerable and needy. There are no words.

  • Lorenzo

    The agenda was sent out at 6:06 p.m. to the district.