Latest Poll Reveals Governor Malloy’s Public Approval Rating: Incredibly Low

35 Comments

A new public opinion survey, conducted by Public Policy Polling, a survey research firm from North Carolina, reported today that their recent survey of Connecticut voters revealed that “Dan Malloy continues to be one of the most unpopular Governors in the country in our polling. Only 33% of voters approve of him to 51% who disapprove…”  For the details of the survey see: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/08/connecticut-miscellany.html

The survey found that “Malloy only barely gets over 50% approval even with Democrats, at 52/33. Independents disapprove of him by a more than 2:1 margin, 25/53, and with Republicans he’s at 15/73.”

The survey report concludes that “Malloy would trail a hypothetical GOP opponent for reelection right now by a 46/39 margin.”

But as the press release recognizes, by political standards, there is still “plenty of time” for Malloy to rebuild his support.

That said, the results clearly indicate that his policies and approach to governing have not only alienated the vast majority of Republicans and Unaffiliated voters, but his level of support among Democrats remains at record lows.

As far as the total electorate is concerned, the weak economy, Malloy’s 2011 record tax increase, the state’s on-going budget deficits and the sense that he spends an inordinate amount of time cutting ribbons, attending ground breaking ceremonies and generally acting more like a candidate than a governor are probably some of the biggest factors reducing his level of voter support.

In addition, many voters probably question his frequent out of state trips and non-essential expenditure of state funds.  An ironic example was that the headline beside the news about today’s poll read “Malloy To China: ‘To Put Connecticut On The Map’”.

While people who monitor and run political campaigns would suggest that the overall numbers are very troubling, the real news is Malloy’s the lack of support among Democrats and women.

In a state like Connecticut, where unaffiliated voters make up an increasingly larger proportion of voters, a Democratic candidate must start with the vast majority of Democratic voters and a significant majority of women voters, and then a sufficient number of unaffiliated voters to win.

By comparison, this latest public opinion survey reports that only 52% of Democrats approve of the Governor’s job performance and only 34% of women voters approve of Malloy’s performance.

Unfortunately, the poll does not provide enough information to identify why Malloy’s job performance rating is so low.

However, having studied Connecticut voting patterns over the past four decades, the most likely reason is that Governor Dannel Malloy’s policies and priorities have proven to be very different then the policies and priorities that he had promised when he was candidate Dan Malloy.

The Governor’s systematic attack to undermine and vilify Connecticut’s state employees and teachers are just two examples of where Malloy said one thing during the campaign and then did something completely different when he became governor.

For example, during the campaign Malloy often spoke about the importance of public employees but then last year, he spent much of his time decrying excessive state salaries, pensions and the “work ethic” of state employees.  During the 2011 Legislative Session, Malloy would regularly claim that many state employees received pensions of over $100,000, when the fact, the average state employee pension is less than a third of that amount.

Then this year, Malloy shifted his assault to one that repeatedly attacked Connecticut’s public school teachers.  At one point Malloy claimed that all school teachers had to do was show up at school for 4 years and they’d get tenure, when, teachers and parents know that most teachers work extremely hard, earning every dollar of their salary.

Later during the “education reform” debate, Malloy said that he didn’t mind if Connecticut’s education system focused on “teaching to the test,” as long as the standardized test scores went up.  It was a position that teachers and parents found extremely ignorant and insulting.

Beyond the damage this type of rhetoric has had on his support from state employees, teachers and their families, is the reality that most Democrats believe in the role of public servants and the need for a more active, effective government.

Finally, in addition, Malloy’s decision to oppose any tax increase on those making over $1 million dollars while proposing major tax increases on middle income working families, has left many Democrats disillusioned.

Despite all of the above, it is important to reiterate that considering the next gubernatorial election is more than two years away, the Governor and his team still have time to repair some of their relationships with key Democratic voting segments.

Background Note:  For those who regularly monitor political polling, it is important to recognize that Public Policy Polling uses a somewhat controversial automated telephone interview process.  Voters are called and asked to complete an automated survey.  For example, the recording will read a question and then ask, if you agree with that statement push 1, if you disagree with that statement push 2.  Over the years that have been widespread concern that automated calling is not as accurate as surveys conducted by actually phone operators.  That said, the accuracy of this type of polling has been fairly accurate and many campaigns, organizations and media outlets use an automated polling process on a regular basis.

Be Sociable, Share!

  • Linda174

    $20,000 for his trip to China.

    $250,000 to “secure” the Governor’s mansion

    Increase in state trooper services….who knows what else?

    45-50,000 teachers in CT…only won by 6,000 votes….Never again.

    Malloy is toast…one and done!

  • JMC

    I guess this means, Jon, that some Dem legislators will have to show us before Nov. that they will take back our State.

    • jonpelto

      Certainly an opportunity for legislators to make clear whose side they are on….

      Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • guest

        Let’s hold their feet to the fire!

  • guest

    I would not vote for Malloy again.  I’m sorry I voted for him once. 
    Of course Foley would have been a disaster–but I am not sure how far a republican would have gotten with some of the state worker bashing and teacher bashing.  I am disappointed in so many democrats, like Don Williams and Susan Johnson, who have whole-heartedly embraced the anti-teacher, anti-parent, anti-child platform of Dannel Malloy (and, unfortunately, of Barack Obama).
    I hope some of the political rallies this fall will include a lot of teachers, parents, and students, demanding that Obama, and other democrats, support public education.

    • GloriaB

       Don Williams worked for teachers to get rid of some of the worst parts of SB24. I would never characterize him as anti-teacher.

      • guest

        He brought the Special Master to Windham.  The Special Master is anti-teacher, anti-parent, anti-child.  Don Williams was on the committee that wrote the Special Master legislation.
        Williams did mitigate some of the worst aspects of SB24.  But there is still a lot in the final bill that is terrible.  The Commissioner’s network will be a disaster.
        Finally, Williams and all the rest voted Pryor in.  Unanimously.  And Pryor is very bad news.

      • Linda174

        Pryor, Adamowski and Vallas have one thing in common. They are in CT to develop their reputations as “reformers” and to pave the way for future projects/cities/schools to pounce on next. They rarely mention teaching, learning, children and teachers in human terms. We are test scores, salaries, pensions, materials, costs, liabilities. Teachers are a nuisance and kids are cattle.

        If you didn’t see this yet, please read…over 1000 comments AGAINST corporate reform. I will place on the next post…it won’t let me cut and paste.

      • Linda174

        Read this, all the comments and watch the video. A massive opt out protest is our next step:

        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/02/private-firms-eyeing-prof_n_1732856.html

      • JMC

        Linda,
        I totally agree with you on “opting out” of testing. I suspect a fairly small number of parents opting their kids out of testing could nullify the validity of the cohort’s scores and thus possibly bring the whole edifice down. If you google “opting out of standardized testing”  you’ll get all kinds of info. People elsewhere are already at work on this, including the ACLU. Perhaps someone here who can do the math can tell us what % of a cohort not participating would invalidate the rest of the results for the Cohort. 

      • Linda174

        I have to do some reading and research, but I thought I read that it was a small % (between 6-10) and the results would not be valid.

        They can claim the CAPT is needed for graduation, but I don’t think that is true. The CMT’s have little significance in reference to promotion. However, those tests end in two years.

        It doesn’t matter though if we can get a national opt out movement going. They have nothing without the high stakes test.

      • JMC

        Interesting. It would be great if the invalidating % were as small as you suggest. I believe that local “opt out” tables could be set up at schools and school sporting events, much in the manner of an aggressive voter registration campaign. It is possible that a parental rights notification issue might permit actual classroom teachers to  present the opt-out forms in class to students to take home and show their parents, and that then the teachers could collect and submit any that were returned.

      • Linda174

        Well, teachers could NOT pass those out…that I know for sure, but parents can at a variety of places: sporting events, PTO, parent conferences, BOE meetings, etc,

        Here are some prepared flyers that can be printed and even edited if needed:

        http://unitedoptout.com/flyers/

      • JMC

        I also have noticed the material you referenced below. Another good one is optoutofstandardizedtests.wikispaces.com

    • Buygoldandprosper

      You must think before you vote.
      I voted for Foley and I am a life-long Democrat,BUT,I learned my lesson before I could vote, with Alan Cranston in California.
      It is no longer a party thang! One must pick between two and hope for the lesser of the evils.And hope that the appointments are good.
       I still maintain that Foley might not have been too bad.Lazy and rich? Yup. Stupid. Probably not. Able to work across the isle to get things done? Probably.
      Dan is all about Dan. His story has been spun hard and is pretty much fiction. He is a nice guy,but so are a lot of worthless politicians. He got elected because too many people just pull a lever without thinking AND can be bought cheaply.

      • Linda174

        I will never ever pull Malloy’s lever…ever!

      • JMC

        You have the right take on it, Gold. I too voted for Foley.

        I also voted for a Dem local State rep. She then (Jan. 2011)  introduced the Earned Income Tax Credit, i.e. a cash payback to low income/no income filers that put us in the hole for about $120 million, which is how much over budget it came in at ( and that was quite predictible; see the article on EITC’s on Wikipedia). Of course, it was supposed to be paid for by the $200 raise in taxes garnered from each home owner through reducing the property tax write-off by $200. When the deficit was announced in Feb. 2012, Ben Barnes started going after teacher retirement and health care bennies (such as they are – very little). A telling statement by Barnes on March 8 at the Appropriations hearing was that he needed to increase retired teacher healthcare contributions to free up more money for State Worker pensions!  I have little doubt that Malloy is building a Blue welfare state and that he has decided that teachers can be thrown under the bus – but not State workers because they have the votes to hurt Malloy if he tries it with them.

      • JMC

        I’m sorry, the EITC came in at about $20 million over budget, far less indeed than the $120 million I claimed above! The larger figure was in fact the total upward adjusted cost of the EITC, which includes in it the $20 million over budget.
        However, if you want to consider the $120 million payout as responsible for putting us in the hole for that amount, you’re quite free to, because that’s about what the deficit is!

  • guest

    Oh, and regarding polls–I do participate in the better-designed ones–and I especially participate when it involves approval ratings of sitting politicians.

  • Buygoldandprosper

    When ones numbers are in the terlit,head overseas! Only address youg children and frantically make deposits in the favor bank for future withdrawals.
    I want my elected officials to be in the office working most of the time,not running for office.
    Davos.
    China.
    The Middle East.
    Body guards and chauffeurs. Helicopter tours.The storm bunker!
    A $200K sinecure for his wife when other,highly skilled,workers are on the dole.
    Dan is a work of fiction in progress and Connecticut is suffering because of him.
    ANYONE who voted for this evil clown,and his pack of lap-dogs, did Stamford a favor but really,really should have done a little reading about his abilities…not the pablum that his campaign put out but a little digging about his tenure as mayor.

  • RW

    I am a teacher and tend to vote for the Democratic party. After hearing how Malloy views teachers, I will vote for ANYBODY but him in the next election.

  • R.L.

    It’s time for our public unions to make a statement and start endorsing third party candidates.  The democrates have become the other republicants.

    • Linda174

      I don’t think our unions should endorse anyone. We can state what issues and stances benefit children and leave it at that.

      • guest

        Good one.

      • JMC

        Yes, good thought Linda.

  • PorrJohn

    The poll numbers don’t matter one bit. The majority of CT voters are so stupid they will continue to send Malloy and other Democrats back to Hartford year after year until we self destruct.

    • guest

      Except when they send Rowland and Rell and republicans… Malloy is awful, but he is the first dem gov in a long time, and thus even his awfulness just builds on over a decade of Rell and Rowland republicanism.  The stupid voters seemed quite happy with Rell’s fairy-tale version of the state, meanwhile she did the same for her old girl network as the rest do for their old boy network.

      • JMC

        The voters elected a totally Blue gov’t. in CT with a smash-mouth big city Dem as governor. And now you’re seeing the result.

    • Linda174

      Malloy will NOT get re-elected.

  • Pingback: CT Essential Politics – Friday 08.03.12 - CT Devil's Advocate

  • Buygoldandprosper

    Dan does not read the polls. He is too busy making tough decisions and  travel plans. Our good friends,the Chinese, should welcome him again,with open arms. Their economy is booming thanks to states like Connecticut that have shipped jobs en masse for a long,long time. No doubt Dan would remind you that the jobs were “lost” under some else’s watch…and probably due to an uneducated/unskilled workforce.
    How is that Washingto DC office doing? Worth the taxpayers money?
    Is it a positive regional approach to poach jobs,say from Vermont,with taxpayer money and how many jobs do captive insurance companies generate? It might well be a zero sum game with the only winner being DAN who gets bragging rights. In the jobs department one better question the scorekeeper as the numbers are frequently skewed to support Dan’s “visions”.
    SHARED SACRIFICE- Remember that line? Dan gets to live rent-free,gets his wife a cushy job in Hartford,gets driven/flown all over hell and back as he runs for office,decriminalizes doja and heinous crimes,wages war on civil servants (after all,they are servants!) spends the state into insolvency…the list keeps growing but come election time he will continue to blame the ghosts of administrations past.
    Dan does not read polls? He reads polls like he looks in the mirror every morning. It is what politicians do.
    MAYBE there is another reason he is going to China?!
    “China, a country with a long tradition of standardized testing, topped all countries in the international rankings for reading, math, and science in 2009 when it debuted on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) charts.” Nah! It couldn’t be!
     

    • Buygoldandprosper

      Oh. I forgot a great tidbit I just read. Probably old news for this crew here but it made me laugh.

      “On Mar. 14, 2002, the Sacramento Bee reported that “test-related jitters, especially among young students, are so common that the Stanford-9 exam comes with instructions on what to do with a test booklet in case a student vomits on it.”

      Pryor is probably signing a contract,right now, for kid sized barf bags for the school year!

      • jonpelto

        I hadn’t seen this one, but I know a local elementary school did send a kid home on test day because the boy was crying so hard about his stomach hurting and saying he was going to throw up that the school nurse was worried it might be an appendicitis. His mother reported that he “recovered” immediately upon leaving the school ground but cried all the way to school the next day saying he was scared of taking the test. Hurray for school testing!

    • JMC

      I agree. Welcome to one-party State government.

  • Mookalaboona

    This is one teacher who will not vote for Malloy, although I followed who CEA endorsed and look what we got.  I’m not sure he’s going to run again, I think he knows he would lose and he has procured rich buddies where he can get a cushy job I’m sure.