Hooray! CMT Scores Arrive – But are our kids stupid and who do we fire?

77 Comments

From September to March, Connecticut students practiced for the big Connecticut Mastery Tests.

Then, over the course of nearly two weeks in March, the moment of truth finally arrived.

Test proctors took their positions, students were given #2 pencils and bubble sheets, and the process began to find out if our children were, in fact, stupid or smart.

At stake was the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat.

Thanks to Governor Malloy’s “education reform” bill, starting this September, these tests will also play a significant role in determining which teachers get to keep their jobs and which will be fired due to their incompetence.

The State’s new teacher evaluation pilot program, which will be rolled out statewide the following year, begins with the requirement that standardized test score results account for 22.5 percent of a teacher’s annual evaluation and that a total of 45 percent of their evaluation be based on the academic performance of their students.

Connecticut’s “education reformers” wanted the CMT test results, themselves, to count for a full 50 percent of a teacher’s evaluation, but they were beaten down by the teacher unions and a few Democratic legislators who stood in the way of that proposal.

Now, four months after our children took the all-important Connecticut Mastery Tests, we are finally getting the results.

Although parents have yet to get the individual results for their children, the State Department of Education was helpful enough to break out each school district so that the local board of education, superintendent, principals, teachers, parents, community and media could find out whether their children are getting smarter or dumber and where they stand compared to their neighboring school districts.

Now that the results have arrived, it is clear that unfortunately Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor, and his staff, did not provide a sufficiently cogent and complete explanation about how we are supposed to interpret some of these numbers.

Take Mansfield, Connecticut’s K-8 school system for example;

As the chart below reveals, the percent of students scoring at “goal” and at “proficiency” were up in grades 3, 4, 6 and 7.

However, in grade 5, the scores really tumbled, raising major red flags.  (Look for the numbers highlighted in red below).

While we have yet to see the breakdown by teacher, the breadth of the drop in the 5th grade scores raises the specter that one of two things is happening.

Either Mansfield’s 5th graders are unusually stupid compared to their counter-parts in other grades or some of Mansfield’s teachers are relatively incompetent compared to their colleagues, despite the fact that the Mansfield Middle School is regularly recognized as one of the outstanding middle schools in the state and nation.

As people know, Mansfield parents are particularly committed to student achievement and success, so it was with great disappointment that we learned that Commissioner Pryor did not provide an explanation about how to handle the drop in the 5th grade scores.

If Mansfield’s 2012 5th grade just happen to be stupider than other classes, do we invest additional resources in the 6th grade to try and save these students or do we simply allow this unfortunate wave to flow through our school system.

Alternatively, if the drop was due to incompetence on the part of our teachers, do we fire the 5th grade teachers because they failed to ensure that our 5th grader’s scores were higher or do we fire our 4th grade teachers because they didn’t prepare those students for the rigor of 5th grade?

Now it is true that we don’t know if this year’s 5th grade Connecticut Mastery test was, for some reason, harder.   Furthermore, considering the greatest predictors of test scores are poverty, language barriers and special education needs, we don’t know if there happened to be a slightly larger number of poorer students, a slightly greater number of non-English speaking students or a disproportionate number of special education students in this year’s 5th grade.

But since Mansfield invests so much money in its schools, something needs to change as a result of the embarrassing drop in the 5th grade test scores.

Hopefully Commissioner Pryor and the State Department of Education will be providing guidance on these issues, but if not, Mansfield’s Board of Education must move quickly.

Since officially recognizing that this year’s 5th graders were particularly stupid will stigmatize those children, I personally believe that the better course of action would be to require the town to retrain or remove the teacher’s responsible for the drop in scores.

That is why it is so important for Connecticut’s education officials to tell us whether the failing teachers are the ones in the 5th grade or in the 4th grade, since it would certainly be unfair to punish the wrong teachers.

The following chart reveals Mansfield’s CMT scores by grade and selected proficiency level.

Readers should make every effort to acquire the results for their towns so that they too can demand that similar steps be taken to identify who is at fault for the disappointing scores their schools may have received.

Mansfield CMT Scores

 

           
Grade 3 Math % At/Above Goal Math % At/Above Proficiency Reading % At/Above Goal Reading % At/Above Proficiency Writing % At/Above Goal Writing % At/Above Proficiency
2011 84.6 93.1 72.3 83.1 72.7 88.3
2012 82 95.9 71.5 87 72 92
State 2012 66.8 85.8 59.2 74.5 62.7 83.2
 

Grade 4

 

           
2011 80.2 93.9 75.4 85.4 75.6 89.3
2012 82.8 93.3 80.5 90.2 79.3 91.9
State 2012 68.2 85.8 64.1 78.3 65.3 83.7
 

Grade 5

 

           
2011 88.7 97.2 78.7 89.4 78.7 95.7
2012 82.9 93.2 72.7 83.9 69.7 87.6
State 2012 71.8 85.7 67.7 79.7 68.1 88.5
 

Grade 6

 

           
2011 78.6 95 77.9 90 75 93.6
2012 86.4 97.1 86.4 95 89.9 97.1
State 2012 69.5    87.2 74.2 84.8 67.5 84.9
 

Grade 7

 

           
2011 76.8 94.4 82.1 88.6 75.5 90.9
2012 79.3 94.3 87.1 93.6 78.6 92.9
State 2012 68.3 86.7 79.9 87.4 65.6 83.9
 

Grade 8

 

           
2011 80 91.7 85.5 89 83.7 91.8
2012 73.8 95.9 84.7 91.7 81.4 95.9
State 2012 67.4 87.1 76.8 86.2 68.4 86.2

 

Be Sociable, Share!

  • Karen

    I have three children, each with very different academic capabilities. I find it a gross injustice that their teachers should be judged on my children’s performances on standardized testing.

    • Brutus2011

      Amen. Please Karen, go before your local BOE and present your views!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tommy-Burns/712565941 Tommy Burns

      Karen–you have it right–my kids scores are my kids scores–not the teachers or the school districts–time to come back to some good old individual accountability—-for the STUDENT!!!

      • Jeff Klaus

        Have you no responsibility for the education of children other than showing up in the morning at some building?

      • Linda174

        Didn’t use just say “ad hominems should be beneath you”? How do you know what he does in each school building? Aren’t you busy at Webster Bank?

        Have you no other responsibility besides trolling websites trying to defend your wife’s profitable charter chain?

      • Luv2Teach

        OMG I NEED to get my hard-earned money out of Webster Bank ASAP!!!

      • Linda174

        Yes, please do. And write a letter to the CEO, James C. Smith:

        https://www.websteronline.com/about-webster/webster/our-company/management-team/james-c-smith.html

        I am presently composing my letter. I will get the corporate address to you soon.

  • Querculus

    Boy would those scores be great in Bridgeport.  The next part of the calculus is how to make it at all fair across town/city lines.  Otherwise, who in their right mind would work in Hartford or Bridgeport?

    • Linda174

      After Vallas, Pryor and Adamowski nobody except the temporary TFA scabs.

    • jonpelto

      So right!

      And so will they hold urban teachers to a different standard than middle class suburban communities.

      Is a 4 point drop in Mansfield better or worse than a 1 point increase in Hartford?

      These people are so arrogant and so stupid and yet they get away with the crap they say.

      I really want to hear the answer. You got the Mansfield Data. Tell me what it means?

      The fact is, the sample size is so small it has no statistical significance at all – but how after all this – do they admit that the data literally can’t be used at the teacher or even grade level.

      • Jeff Klaus

        Ad hominems should be beneath you.

  • Linda174

    A couple of questions…are you comparing the fifth graders to their results from 4th grade? Or are you comparing two separate fifth grade classes…entirely different children. It looks like when compared to themselves in 2011 their scores improved slightly in only one row, but dropped in all others. Also, do you know how many kids are represented by a 1% drop? Do you know if enrollment changed during the two school years from 4th to 5th grade?

    Also, two comments…I believe progress and performance on these types of tests cannot be pinned on one single teacher. Learning is cumulative and a student’s success or failure is a combination of many factors.

    I am also wondering and have asked many (admin, local union reps, state union reps – with no answer by the way) how they plan on tying test scores to individual teachers after 5th or 6th grade when most students will have 7-8 teachers in a day.

    And according to our new Common Core standards, but this was true before, all teachers are responsibile for literacy via their content area (meaning reading and writing). I would not include math teachers here…they have their own subtests to worry about.

    So hypothetically, if an 8th grade student does poorly on the reading and writing subtests, who are you going to fire? His English teacher? Reading or foreign language? Should he have been in a foreign language? Science or social studies?
    His 8th grade teacher? 7th grade teachers? 6th, 5th, etc? All of them?

    I don’t believe they have even planned this out nor do they have a system in place for tracking every single teacher (guidance, sped, gym, art, music, nurse, school psychologist, etc) to some type of test score.

    And remember Joe C., head of the CAPSS said this would require more administrators and therefore, we would need to lay off teachers so we can evaluate teachers to find out which ones to fire and get rid of more teachers.

    This new evaluation system will surely leave no consultant and no administrator/evaluator behind. We will become even MORE top heavy (who knew that was even possible) and there will be even less of those really great teachers who can boost test scores….which nowadays is only sign of achievement.

    When exactly do we start evaluating the “reformers”?

    • jonpelto

      Exactly….

      Every day the reformers talk about using the standardized test scores to “measure” teacher effectiveness but they never address how one would do it.

      If you had a full round of standardized tests in September and another in June and claimed you were tracking the members of that class you could claim – although the sample would be to small – that you are measuring change due, at least in part, to a particular teacher.

      But one year to the next – when the make up of the grade and classes change – when poverty, language barriers and special education needs impact across all different venues – to measure a small sample from one year to the next is statistically and intellectually so dishonest as to be fraudulent.

      So let’s hear it from Pryor.

      Mansfield, Connecticut

      Small school

      4th grade to 5th grade

      Small drop in percent at goal and proficiency

      But measuring different students

      With completely different demographics

      SO TELL US – what does it mean?

      You say test results can tell you something —- OKAY —- what do these test results tell you.
      My tongue in check observations are obviously absurd – so what it the right conclusion.

      • Linda174

        That’s the point though they don’t….and they don’t care. This isn’t about the kids anymore. This is a way to get rid of teachers, to deprofessionalize teaching, to create a cheap labor force of at will employees, to make teaching an exact science, to create pliant worker bees, to have a work force that will not question their master, etc. We are going backwards and entering the stone age……they do not care about compassion and relationships, which is the foundation of a teacher-student bond.

        However, this is why ultimately ( who knows when? ) this reform movement, the corporate Broad, Rhee, TFA etc, kind, will at some point collapse. They really don’t care about humans, otherwise known as: children, parents, teachers, citizens, taxpayers…you know the little people. They care about data, numbers, human capital, money….it is a business, not a common good.

        When, and it will happen, parents and students begin to opt out of the high stakes testing, they will have nothing. This entire charade only has one way to categorize everybody…test scores. When that ends, they will slither away and find another way to suck from the public trough for their own personal gain.

        Please read this account by a dad in PA and tell me they actually give a ___!

        I know I post a lot, but read it and look at the two pictures of his son..he repeatedly calls him “my boy”. Tell me you can read this and not become sick to your stomach. I will cut and paste on the next slide…titled “An absence of compassion in the face of change”.

      • Linda174

        http://www.geekpalaver.com/2012/07/19/an-absence-of-compassion-in-the-face-of-change/

        Please read…when we combine personal stories like these of real children and real parents and real teachers on a massive scale, they will retreat.

      • guest

        Thankyou.  Very inspiring.

      • Bronx

         Wow Linda….so inspiring yet sad. I’ve been teaching long enough to remember administrators being former teachers with a business and management savvy. Now its managers and business people with no ties to the classroom whatsoever…Maybe its Parents across America…maybe its the work of Diane Ravitch and Jon, I believe the spark has been lit, now it’s time for parental, and real educational masses to fan the flame to get the pendulum swinging back in the right direction…

      • Jeff Klaus

        Great question. What does it mean? To answer that question you would have to parse the data. Who are the kids, what do they bring to the school with them, who are the teachers, what has been their track record, any cross references to be made via the similar or dissimilar experiences of other teacher peers…etc. There has never been a perfect evaluation system in such a complex profession. But the challenge of implementing valid evaluations is no excuse to not embrace professional standards based on student outcomes. The real travesty would to keep doing what we have done, that is to have no substantive evaluation system and to only reward longevity and basic compliance.

      • jonpelto

        Jeff, you know enough about these issues to know what you are saying is simply not true.
        The sample size per teacher is to small to make statistically significant observations. In addition with the make up of classes changing the averages don’t work because they are so significantly impacted by small changes such as the number of english language learners etc that changes each yrar.
        If you remove those students, the sample size gets even smaller and the statistical accuracy becomes even less valid.
        Second, as far as the individual student is concerned there are too many independent variables – most coming from outside the reach of the teacher to determine the particular impact of the teacher vs. Other teachers vs other factors.
        You of all people know the problems with what you are saying.

        The core curriculum theoretically would make a difference over time but even then each district and grade will develop their own curriculum as the attempt to include the core standards.
        To achieve what you say you’d want you’d need a completely standardized teacher training program, a single curriculum and an ability to remove or weight the particular impacts of variables likr poverty., language barriers and special education impacts.
        We can’t have a useful discussion about these issues if you refuse to recognize the intellectual dishonesty of your arguments.

        Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • Jeff Klaus

        Jon – you don’t want a useful discussion. You just seem to want to publish opinions based on flawed superficial analysis of select numbers. You clearly relish bringing out the worst in your followers. Your posters frequently resort to using obscenities, post racist videos, and use threats and intimidation. And you cheer them on. If you really wanted a useful discussion you would have accepted my invitation to actually visit an AF school and do some primary research. But that would have ruined your narrative wouldn’t it? Invitation still stands.

      • Linda174

        Of all the schools to visit in CT, why does he have to visit an AF school? Why can’t a blogger visit a public school or another charter?

        And just to clarify, there are no threats here…they are promises and actions. Teachers have the freedom to choose as well.

        There has only been one video posting that was questionable, so don’t get all hysterical.

        If you are suddenly so concerned about being kind and decent you should have emulated that quality yourself to begin with…it goes both ways.

        You show a lack of respect for teachers who are not employed by your charter chain. Your disdain drips with every post.

      • Linda174

        Keep doing what we have done…do you mean?

        MYTH
        Achievement First effectively prepares students for college.

        FACT
        Charter school authorizers cite Achievement First schools in NYC for failing to properly support the “development of higher-order thinking and student voice in order to meet the goal of college readiness.”

  • Buygoldandprosper

    Reminds me of  cum hoc ergo propter hoc, or something like that. Test scores. Might as well link them to solar flares while you are at it.
    Dan’s whole reformation is a poorly managed joke at the expense of
    the citizens of Connecticut. A campaign sound bite…”I addressed the unpopular issues,blah,blah,blah…” 
    Does the compensation of special masters and top-level apparatchik’s get tied into test scores as well?

    • Linda174

      Malloy doesn’t understand any of this. He has given Pryor all the power. Pryor is operating under the Bloomberg/Broad principles of running it like a business. I keep telling everyone to read chapter five in the Ravitch book. I wish I could copy, scan and attach somehow. I will try. It is the play book for Stefan Pryor…he is a Bloomberg minion. Word is Dannel loves and worships our commissioner, the one who never taught ever..no prior teaching experience needed to run the schools in our state.

    • jonpelto

      Couldn’t have put it better myself.

      And they get away with the crap they say.

      So come on you arrogant thugs! Tell us – what do the results mean.

      I know all of these teachers.

      I had two kids go through that fourth and fifth grade.

      Tell me – which ones do we kick out based on these results?

      First they will say this is only one year – but of course – two years of “poor evaluations” and the person is gone – so we will make this easier – tell us which teacher we put on probation based on these results?

      Solar flares! That is one of the great lines of all time!

      • Brutus2011

        Wow! Jon–you are my hero!

  • Sue

    I still haven’t figured out which are the 21 failing schools. There are so many…..

  • Sue

    Using cohort groups, the grade 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10th sped students who took the Math MAS (Modified Assessment System)  took big hits. However, the 5th graders were the only ones to really bomb on the reading @ -1.4. When you consider that many students have a language based disability it’s strange that the math was the issue – and for many of them a computer read the problems to them, and the program provided calculators.

  • GloriaB

    http://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/a-significant-error-that-policymakers-commit/  
    This is one of my favorite articles on why it is a mistake to rely on student test scores to evaluate teachers.

    • jonpelto

      Great piece! I need to link to it.

  • GloriaB

    Using AYP and comparing this year’s fifth graders to last year’s fifth graders is ludicrous. It would be like telling my daughter she had to grow three inche this year because her brother did last year.

    • Jeff Klaus

      No, it would be like checking your daughter’s height year to year to see if she had grown at all. Sign of a potential problem.

      • Linda174

        You know what would be worse? If she was kicked out of the family for not growing at all because she made the family statistics look bad. Wouldn’t that be a shame?

      • guest

        yes!

      • jonpelto

        Good one Linda!

        Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • GloriaB

         Or if my husband and I were labeled as a “failing family”

      • guest

        All children should grow at the same rate each year.  If not… well, goodness, what could that mean? 

      • Background Check

        Jeff’s analogy is incorrect.  Gloria’s is more accurate.  Looking at the scores of two different cohorts is closer to looking at the growth rate of two different children.  

        I’m surprised that Jeff would make such a mistake since his wife runs one of the largest charter school management companies in CT.  I wonder if he’s been reading ConnCAN propaganda again.  There’s a reason why they won the “Bunkum Award”.
        http://jonathanpelto.com/2012/06/02/national-education-policy-center-gives-conncan-its-national-award-for-misleading-the-public/

      • jonpelto

        Excellent point about Gloria’s observation being more correct that Jeff’s

      • GloriaB

         Jeff-
         AYP requires this year’s fifth graders’ scores to improve over last year’s fifth graders’ scores. We are not comparing each child’s individual growth. That’s what the problem with NCLB is all about. We are comparing scores of two diverse groups of children and saying the comparison means something- when it doesn’t.

  • vpotus

    As a teacher of 24 years, I’ve always been amused by the attributes that follow a class from year to year. Some classes are nice. I remember one year when we had a critical mass of popular kids who were great students; they set the tone that year. The students learned a lot and the scores were very high. 

    Unfortunately, if one gets a particular class that has a high percentage of the “less-invested”… a negative tone for learning develops. This, compounded with the governor’s proclamation that education is solely based on the teacher’s ability and skill, harms the educational gains of the students. 

    Ever since NCLB, I’ve been wondering when the students will be part of the education equation. Scores will improve when STUDENTS are expected to complete their homework and study. Scapegoating the teachers won’t change a thing. 

    Thank you for the free therapy.

  • Paul Bogush

    I can’t tell if you are serious or being sarcastic. If you are being serious at the end I have lost faith in your blog.

    • Paulbogush1

      Nevermind….saw your comment below.

  • Linda174

    Students First…the Rheeject is offering prizes for the best blog post promoting PRO REFORM….whatever that may be.

    Feel free to choose your favorite post here and send it along…email is included below…a Mrs. Robinson.

    Copied from Ravitch…choose your two favorite pro reform posts from Jon’s blog….maybe one of us can win the restaurant gift card. Yippee! This is not a joke. Sadly, it is real.

    She even says she looks forward to reading our comments. Let’s send as many as possible.

    From: Catherine Robinson
    Date: July 26, 2012 9:58:12 PM EDT
    To: Catherine Robinson
    Subject: rapid responses needed – and a contest!
    Hi all,

    I’m going to be in Orlando all next week for the KIPP Conference. If you’d like to meet up and discuss ways you can get more involved in our movement, please let me know!

    Also, starting right now, there will be a monthly contest for the best rapid response. The more comments you leave on blog posts, the more times you can enter! Post a polite and persuasive pro-reform comment and email me the link so I can check it out.

    That’s all you have to do!

    At the end of the month (August 26th at midnight) I will announce the winner. Not only will that winner get a gift card to the restaurant or store of choice, but he or she will also be promoting the cause of real and transformative change in public schools! What could be better?
    Here are some links for your review:

     http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/gradebook/content/officials-new-hillsborough-teachers-join-union
    http://www.nyfera.org/?p=3812
    http://www.edexcellence.net/commentary/education-gadfly-daily/common-core-watch/2012/will-common-core-usher-in-a-return-to-content-driven-instruction.html
    http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/charterschoice/2012/07/parent_trigger_goes_hollywood.html
    http://www.gainesville.com/article/20120726/OPINION01/120729756/1076/opinion?template=printpicart
    http://stateimpact.npr.org/florida/2012/07/25/judge-says-california-parents-cant-unpull-trigger-petition/
    http://www.news-journalonline.com/news/local/east-volusia/2012/07/26/report-ranks-florida-behind-most-states-on-child-health-and-education.html

    I look forward to reading your comments!
    Have a wonderful weekend,
    Catherine

    Catherine Durkin Robinson
    Regional Outreach Manager
    Florida
    M: (813) 453-4274
    http://www.StudentsFirst.org

  • guest

    I have always despised the standardized test regime.  When the Bush Administration created the NCLB legislation, they locked the whole system into the tests.
    It was obvious from the start that poorer districts would suffer the most.  I kept waiting for the more successful districts to criticize the regime… but they never did it to any extent.  Their districts did well…  as everyone knew they would. 
    Mansfield will most likely not suffer any lasting damage.   Most wealthy districts will be offered some kind of “out” of the eval and ratings requirements, while the Hartfords, Bridgeports, New Havens, New Britains, Windhams, etc, won’t.

    • Jeff Klaus

      The vast majority of great teachers that I know feel that the standardized tests are no big deal. They are minimum standards by which we can tell which kids are mastering the basics. And the basics are easily assessed via standardized testing.

      • Linda174

        What teachers do you know? The ones that work at Achievement
        First and leave every 2-3 years. Can’t mention the attrition rate of students and teachers, can we? When parents start to opt out and the results are not valid what will you have to boast about?

        Stick to banking Mr. Klauss IF that is your area of expertise. They evidently need some help given the Libor scandal. You do not know what you are talking about. Here is some feedback for you from a former Achievement First test prep “teacher”:

        Former AF teacher 
        June 25, 2012 at 11:32 am
        But when you hire teachers with experience at AF schools, who do these teachers turn to for help? Not managers because they went straight through from TFA and have very little experience to offer help and advice. The managers have less experience than non-TFA teachers. That’s why there is a constant turnover of teachers. The experienced ones leave and you are left with people you must train who have most likely have never been around children. It is run like a business instead of like a school.

      • Linda174

        MYTH
        Achievement First (AF) has created a network of consistently high-performing charter schools.

        FACT
        All of Achievement First’s elementary and middle schools in Connecticut failed to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for the 2010-11 school year, and two AF schools were identified as “In Need of Improvement.”

        MYTH
        Achievement First schools outperform their surrounding school districts while educating similar numbers of high need students.

        FACT
        All Achievement First schools have a significant and consistent pattern of serving fewer English Language Learners (ELL) and students with Limited English Proficiency (LEP), Students With Disabilities (SWD), and Economically Disadvantaged (ED) students than their surrounding districts.

        AF Amistad High School has more than a 50% student attrition rate from 9th to 12th grade and small numbers of high school graduates. 100% of AF graduates are accepted into four-year colleges because AF requires its students to be accepted into four-year colleges in order to graduate.

        http://wecanri.org/

      • R.L.

        When you work in an upper middle class school with upper middle class students, the test results don’t matter.  When you teach in poor schools where many students don’t speak english, the test results matter.  Wealthy students learn and test better than poor students.  The millions of dollars spent on testing, data tracking and administrators to put a spin on test scores sucks resources right out of the classroom.  The results show us what we already know.  Put the money into the classroom and stop demonizing teachers who teach in difficult areas.

        A school is a reflection of the community it’s in.  Don’t blame teachers for the culture of the community they teach in.

      • jonpelto

        Good one R.L.

        Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • Luv2Teach

        AMEN!!

      • guest

        I’m sure you know lots of those “highly qualified” Teach For America teachers.  Sure tests are no big deal, when all you’re doing is teaching how to take the test.

      • GloriaB

         As a great teacher I always knew which of my students were mastering the basics because I was constantly assessing them in my classroom. That’s the point. I don’t need a high stakes, once a year standardized test to tell me which students I need to give more attention to. These tets are deigned to make money- bottom line.

      • jonpelto

        Thank you for making it so clear Gloria.

        Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

  • Chris

    Very good Jonathan! The absurdity of these reforms made clear!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tommy-Burns/712565941 Tommy Burns

    Thank you John and Diane–your lives actually have purpose and I am grateful that you are breathing–Tom

  • Bill Morrison

    There will be many lawsuits from teachers over this! Does anyone want to get a jump and start a class asction suit now?

    • Bronx

       Bill, I’m not entirely sure, but talking to my union reps in various buildings who are on top of this have stated that part of the legislation or proposed legislations in the future, told me that language within  makes it impossible for any potential litigation…To me that would make perfect sense, since these parasites know full well they are de-professionalizing teaching and want to cover their various asses…

      • Linda174

        However, I think when they try to fire the first teacher (s), who had a record of success and positive evaluations, over test scores, especially when it is difficult to track a score back to one single teacher (grades 6-12), you will then have the beginning of a class action suit.

        This would be more so in states with unions, collective bargaining and other rights. Just wait for that to happen. In the meantime they just plan to keep intimidating and demeaning us with the hopes that the veterans will all just retire early.

        I am dismayed at how quickly the supers group (CAPSS) turned against us. Read about their sudden concern for the principals in Bridgeport. It is an entirely different story when the leaders are either losing jobs or being moved around…http://blog.ctnews.com/education/2012/07/26/principal-shake-up-in-bridgeport-underway/

        CAPSS was willing to throw all of us under the bus with the original SB 24….difficult to trust them now.

      • guest

        Absolutely.

  • Linda174

    This is all you need to know about where our current adminstration in DC stands on school reform:

    http://ow.ly/i/I2Da

    But here she is finally being challenged, but not by anyone in our country.

    I believe she is lying again.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18592185

  • Renzo

    In regard to the 5th grade scores in Mansfield you have to consider what were the scores of these students when they were in 4th grade.  I have not researched this on CT Reports but it needs to be looked at before the fingerpointing starts.  It is possible that the 5th graders improved when compared to their previous years scores.

    • jonpelto

      True but moving from 4th to 5th is a move from a single teacher to multiple teachers, from 3 elementary schools to 1 middle school. Those changes alone make the results suspect. 2nd the two grades have two different curriculum which may or may not align at the same level to the test.
      Remember the test is “standardized” but not the curriculum so it is possible the 4th grade curriculum is less aligned which means the 4th grade scores will be artificially law.
      The more you know the more obvious it is the you simply can not make statements the reformers say. Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

  • Linda174

    Note to fellow teachers. In case you didn’t know, but you probably already do, Mr. Jeff Klaus is a Senior Vice President at Webster Bank. He is also married to
    Dacia Toll, Co-CEO of the Achievement First Charter Management Company and founder of Amistad, with the help of our commissioner Stefan Pryor.

    I previously wrote a letter to Mr. James C. Smith, President of
    Webster Bank, which was also printed in the Waterbury Republican, refuting some of his claims in an op-Ed piece supporting the original SB24. As a result of the letter and the subsequent printing in the paper, another executive from the bank called me to smooth things over. This was back in the spring.

    I noted in my letter that I was a Webster Bank customer and a public school teacher.

    So, if Mr. Klaus continues to bash teachers and public schools on this site and others, I will close my account and take my business elsewhere.

    I will also keep track of and print out examples of his demeaning comments. Yes, there is freedom of speech but we do not have to do business with a bank that employs mean spirited, self- serving know-it-alls who know very little about teaching and learning, the kind that happens when you spend years in the classroom with children, not sitting in the back with fellow execs. as a token appearance.

    And I encourage all of you to spread the word.

    https://www.websteronline.com/about-webster/webster/get-to-know-us/jeffrey-klaus.html

    • Brutus2011

      My I respectfully suggest that you immediately close your Webster Bank account and send another letter to the very top official of Webster Bank detailing why. Don’t play with these people. They are not playing with you/us.

      • Linda174

        Yes and I will include specific comments.

        He may be an authority on banking. He is not an authority on teaching and learning.

    • Mbracksieck

      Linda, would you be able to post the link to the op-ed in the Waterbury Republican?  I would love to pass it along to other activist teachers.

      • Linda174

        They require subscription and sometimes their opeds and letters expire. I will look. I may have saved the paper copy. Let me check.

      • Linda174

        I will paste the link, but I don’t think it will work. Here is the link and the letter it its entirety. I suspect they had some help from the Klaus/Toll family:

        http://www.rep-am.com/articles/2012/04/01/commentary/631747.txt

        Connecticut is at a fork in the road on education. We can perpetuate a system with our nation’s biggest achievement gap between students in low-income and higher-income schools; or we can chart a bold new course that will give every child the opportunity for a great education and the skills to pursue a meaningful career.

        If we care about children and our state’s future, there really is no choice. The legislature must enact genuine reforms, as outlined in Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s proposal. Unfortunately, as amended by the Education Committee on March 26, SB 24 is not true reform. The committee watered down key provisions proposed by the governor and supported by a broad group of organizations.

        Everyone has read about the system’s failings. Low-income fourth- and eighth-graders perform, on average, more than three grade levels below their wealthier peers in basic subjects such as reading and math. Every day, more than 100,000 Connecticut students attend schools the state has classified for five years or more as substandard and in need of improvement. Yet they fail to improve. More than 8,000 Connecticut high school students drop out each year. Too many of those who do graduate arrive at postsecondary schools needing remedial math or English.

        Comprehensive in its approach, SB 24 as originally introduced by the governor aims to fix what ails our schools in five critical areas:

        Accountability. We must adopt new performance-based evaluation and tenure systems for teachers, principals and superintendents. This was the most glaring omission from the Education Committee’s revised bill. Without this measure, even the best-intended reforms will languish.

        Supporting educators. Just as in every other aspect of our lives, we must reward performance among teachers and administrators, evaluate them as we do every other professional, and provide opportunities to improve their skills.

        At-risk students. Our state must give more children access to quality early-childhood-education programs; provide additional assistance to students from low-income households or poor academic histories; and offer incentives to teachers who choose to work in low-performing schools.

        Fixing broken schools. We need a systematic, intensive approach for intervening in failing schools, delivering the resources to fix what’s wrong, and monitor results.

        n Offering choice. Funding for magnet, charter and technical high schools needs to be increased, with preference for charter schools with a record of educating underserved children.

        Education reform is by no means code for scapegoating teachers. We respect the state’s many excellent teachers. However, to raise academic achievement for all of Connecticut’s students, we need to ensure every child in Connecticut has a great teacher every year.

        Connecticut’s economy also will pay a heavy price if we fail to address lower productivity, fewer qualified workers and higher social costs. The impact on the dropouts themselves is devastating. They can expect to earn less, be unemployed more often, and be more likely to go to prison. Connecticut employers know our public schools must produce more college- and career-ready graduates if we are to improve our state’s economic viability and vitality. If we do not reform education meaningfully, Connecticut’s retirees for the first time in 50 years will be better educated than those replacing them.

        Faced with an opportunity to support transformational change, the Education Committee blinked. The full legislature must seize this moment, restore the measures proposed by Gov. Malloy, and enact genuine education reform. Now is the time to let your voice be heard. Contact your legislators and urge them to enact education reform as proposed by the governor. It is time to do the right thing for our children and change the education system in Connecticut.

        James C. Smith is chairman and CEO of Webster Financial Corp. John J. Crawford is lead director of Webster and president of Strategem LLC of New Haven.

      • Linda174

        This was my response that was printed about three days later. I was afraid they would change the meaning if I exceeded the online word limit, so I kept it brief.

        This is in response to the April 1 op-ed “Restore the Malloy plan for education,” by James C. Smith and John J. Crawford. Mr. Smith and Mr. Crawford are misinformed on the effectiveness of charter schools and the long-term ramifications of Senate Bill No. 24 (aka “An Act Concerning Educational Competitiveness”).

        Please take the time to read these reports to gain another perspective: “Snapshots of Connecticut Charter School Data,” by Bruce D. Baker; “Hired Guns on Astroturf: How to Buy and Sell School Reform,” by Joanne Barkan; and “The Myth of Charter Schools,” by Diane Ravitch.

        Having taught in public schools for 26 years, I know the “reformers” do not understand the full impact of S.B. 24. I would like them to consider the possibility that teachers, who have been on the front lines for many years, have their own insights.

        Breeding a nation of test takers is not going to produce college- and career-ready graduates. If Mr. Smith and Mr. Crawford have the time to respond, I would like to hear their proposals for solving the other problems associated with the system’s failings, factors even the best teacher cannot control. They include poverty, chronic absences, disengaged parents, homelessness, neglected or abused children, drug or alcohol abuse, and defiant or poorly socialized children.

        S.B. 24 is an attempt to apply a business model to public education; a skeptic may view this proposal as a way to reduce labor costs under the pretense of helping children.

        Given all of our societal problems, do you actually believe weeding out the small percentage of ineffective of teachers, who earned tenure as determined by an ineffective administrator, will be the deciding factor in narrowing the achievement gap? 

      • jonpelto

        Great job Linda!

      • Mbrackseick

        Thanks for both of these.

      • guest

        You are a true heroine!

  • Linda174

    Please watch Diane Ravitch’s speech from the AFT convention today in Detroit:

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rich-White/100000066062155 Rich White

    Letter Grades are even more subjective. Shouldn’t we get rid of them completely as Melissa Harris Parry suggests?

    Shouldn’t we get rid of the Praxis Exams? And Subject exams for teachers? They compare across co-horts and are thus invalid. It’s like measuring Sister X  against Brother Y ?

    Shouldn’t we just end all accountability and performance rankings in society? And trust the AFT and NEA that watever they say is right and give eveyrone a degree at 18? And let the NEA and CFT certify anyone who wants to pay dues as an educator?

  • Pingback: CT Essential Politics – Monday 07.30.12 - CT Devil's Advocate

  • Linda174

    I just spoke to the public relations office for Webster bank.Letters of concern and/or to details as to why you are closing your Webster account should be directed to:James C. SmithWebster Bank, CEO Office of the President145 Bank StreetWaterbury, CT 06702