Commissioner Pryor, What’s that stench? It’s Coming from the Double Standard!

27 Comments

At yesterday’s State Board of Education Meeting, Commissioner Stefan Pryor recommended, and the State Board voted, to take over the New London School System.  They also voted to renew Achievement First – Bridgeport’s charter for another five years.

As was the case with Windham’s Schools, the Commissioner and Board determined that the New London’s democratically elected Board of Education was not capable of running a school district without state oversight.

At the same time, the Commissioner and board members decided that while Achievement First – Bridgeport “has some work to do on its curriculum,” it is “helping to close the state’s achievement gap.”  The school’s performance was so impressive that the State Board of Education not only voted to give the school a five year renewal (instead of a more limited three year renewal), but it also approved Achievement First’s request to add 135 new seats at the school, which will mean an additional $350,000 a year in state funds for the school, when the new charter school funding formula is fully implemented.

So Achievement First – Bridgeport must be succeeding where Windham and New London are failing.

But take a look at the following chart and don’t forget that the greatest predictors of poorer performance on standardized test scores are poverty, language barriers and the number of students who need special education services.

Greater poverty, a higher percentage of special education students and higher numbers of non-English speaking students mean lower school or district wide test scores.

The data is absolutely clear.  Achievement First – Bridgeport has fewer poor children, half the number of special educations students and less than a fourth the number of non-English speaking students…and yet their test scores are the same as Windham’s and significantly lower than New London’s.

Think about it.

Achievement First – Bridgeport’s students are less poor, less likely to need special education services and far less likely to have language barriers and yet they do far worse on standardized tests than New London’s students and about the same as Windham’s students.

But Windham and New London face an unprecedented state takeover and Achievement First – Bridgeport is rewarded with a 5 year renewal of their charter and permission to expand.

What would account for such an outrage?

Ignorance?  Unlikely, I got these numbers right off the State Board of Education’s website.

On the other hand, Connecticut’s Commissioner of Education and the Chairman of the State Board of Education are both “big supporters” of charter schools.  As we know, Commissioner Pryor was a founding member of Achievement First, served as one of their Directors for eight years, resigning that position only to accept Governor’ Malloy’s offer to become Commissioner,  and, as a Director for Achievement First, voted for their aggressive expansion plan that calls for nearly doubling the number of students they manage.

Meanwhile, Chairman Taylor is a long-time member of ConnCAN’s Advisory Board, ConnCAN being the charter school advocacy group created by Achievement First.  ConnCAN being the group that spent half a million dollars lobbying on behalf of Malloy’s proposal to expand funding for Connecticut’s charter schools.

So there you have it, the Commissioner of Education and the State Board of Education are taking actions that directly benefit organization that they are connected too, while undermining the most basic democratic rights of two of Connecticut’s communities.

There are some who would say that it is almost criminal.

Here is the data:

  5th Grade Reading at Goal 6th Grade Writing at Goal % Free or reduced lunch % Special Education % Not Fluent in English % From homes where English is not the Primary Language
             
Achievement First Bridgeport 23.6% 26.6% 66% 8% 6% 6%
             
Windham Schools 22% 24.9% 73% 16% 25% 35%
             
New London Schools 36.6% 34.8% 94% 14% 21% 25%

 

Be Sociable, Share!

  • Linda174

    Will the charter school teachers be reviewed and evaluated under the proposed PEAC system? Or is it just the public school teacher? I haven’t heard anything about evaluating charter school teachers.

    Jon, I thought the SB 24 that passed said they had to come up with a plan for attracting and retaining all students and of an equal proportion of the neighboring schools meaning: ELL, sped and homes where English is not the primary language

    Who monitors that they follow what was agreed to? If it is the State BOE, we are in trouble. It appears Taylor, Pryor, Vallas and Adamowski are all in bed together.

    • jonpelto

      Last I saw the requirement the charters actually represent the community only applies to new charters… as to monitoring – the 5 year extension pretty much proves the reality of the numbers don’t matter… Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • guest

        Ugh!  although it totally makes sense in this twisted world we live in.

  • Linda174

    So in a nutshell, the charter school scores are lower and they get a five year renewal. New London’s scores are higher and they get a state takeover.

    Please read…NYC has had it with testing.

    http://www.nytimes.com/schoolbook/2012/06/07/parents-and-students-say-enough-to-more-testing/

    Time for CT parents to pull their kids out on testing days, including testing the upcoming test. That is if the district even tells you.

    • guest

      Yes, be a hero, take a zero on standardized tests. 
      Let’s hope that Pryor, with his double and triple standards, does not suddenly decide to let Greenwich and Farmington off the hook for standardized testing, while keeping the yoke on more stessed districts.

      • Linda174

        Love the slogan….be a hero, take a zero…we need to start whispering this at parent conferences….bumper stickers, bracelets, banners….love it.

  • savage

    There are some who would say that it is almost criminal.

    I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that there is almost certainly criminal activity going on where CT “ed reform” is concerned. The FBI has been pretty active in the state lately (CRT, Donovan, etc.)–I think they need to take a look at the state BOE, Vallas, Adamowski, Pryor et al.

    • guest

      It seems to be criminal, doesn’t it?  Unitl you look at how the “health care” bill was written (with insurance companies at the table); or how outside sources funded Scott Walker’s survival…
      something’s rotten when the supreme court rules in favor of corporations…. then again, was there ever a golden age?

      • savage

        Perhaps not criminal in the literal sense, then. How about morally reprehensible, then? Unconstitutional? There are those who are calling for a recall of the Supreme Court. Maybe they have the right idea…

    • Luv2Teach

      I agree!  This just makes me sick to my stomach! WHO is protecting us from these criminals who are running and laughing all the way to the bank – oh wait, no, they don’t have to run, they could take a leisurely stroll… since no one’s chasing them!! 

      • Brutus2011

        Agreed–no one is chasing them. These people know that whatever opposition they have is confused and disorganized.

        Teachers are too busy taking care of our kids, and their own.

        Teacher’s union management has to play ball with the education managers or risk losing whatever power they have.

        Many parents are too stretched out to really get as involved as they should be with their children’s education and development..

        Many students do not have the guidance and training to be good students as they should be. (I did not learn how to be a good student until college!)

        So, what do we do now?

        Tell you what, we need to stop these slicksters before too much more time elapses.

        Time for a revolution–as in now.

      • guest

        will the revolution be televised?  or tweeted?
        count me in.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tommy-Burns/712565941 Tommy Burns

    This is sick — immoral—unethical–un-American–non-democratic–and just wrong –wrong–wrong—The transparency is unbelievable(thanks to you Jon)–but the gall of these sick corporate thieves knows no bounds—-if your numbers are true–we need to STOP these self-serving indivduals and their unsavory moves now—NOW–

    • jonpelto

      You summarized it perfectly, I couldn’t have said it better myself.

      Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

    • Luv2Teach

      Well said, Tommy Burns! I’m glad you were able to say those things, because right now I am Speechless! Wow!… just WOW

    • guest

      I agree, well said!

  • R.L.

    I’ve written all of my local and federal representatives, governor Malloy (for whatever that was worth), and the CT attorney general (twice).  I was at a union end of the year party yesterday and asked why the union isn’t pushing for criminal investigations.  I was told that this mandate has to come from the national level, and they are trying to play cooperative with reform (it does sound nice politically).  It was suggested that I write to the national president of AFT, and that’s coming.  I am going to mention what is happening and how the union needs to stop supporting democrats when they don’t represent us.  It’s time to change the structure of the political system by bringing third party candidates to the forefront.  I’m also going to write about how, when things happen here like they have in a few other places with regard to teachers having to pay union dues, I’m going to vote not to pay.  Why would I want to pay dues to an organization that doesn’t stick up for my rights as a worker and doesn’t have the balls to fight for the citizens who are being blatently ripped off by some corporate raiders.

    • savage

      If only I could believe there was enough time between now and November to gain sufficient strength for a third party. Jill Stein for the Green Party, for example. Take a look at this interview I happened upon on Alternet.org: http://www.jillstein.org/alternet_org

  • savage

    I think it’s pretty clear to everyone but the die-hard, religious, conservative far-right that Romney would be a disaster for the country. But with the dems in control here in CT, are things any better? What more assurance do we need that both parties serve the same master?

    • CTVeteran

      do you really think who is president matters? Koch, Waltons and Gates dont care who is president. Does even matter who is president these days? The accountability on our gvmnt is disgusting. Trillions in bailouts and wars but we are fighting for thousands to educate our youth and provide a good health care system for them.

      This whole fight is disgusting. We have corporate sheep touting “its the unions that ruining our country” yet not one can explain how people making $30-90k a year are the cause of the USA downfall. But there is plenty of statistics out there that point to corporate greed.

      Do some research on workplace violence in relation to the ratio of what the average worker compared to the CEOs make.

      In the 1950′s it was something like 10 to 1, now its something like 50-1 maybe even higher.

      Capatilism was based on free-trade and competition, but if that comes with corruption, greed and destroying the country that allows you to operate that way what good is it? I am not advocating socialism, communism, or any other ism. I think changes need to be made. The people need to take the power back, peacefully.

      Parents hold the key in the fight for education. No corporation can stand up to millions of parents saying enough is enough.

  • CT Dad

     Gwen,

    Did the long lines for lifeboats on the sinking Titanic mean that travelers would prefer to cross the Atlantic in open-air 30-foot dinghies?

    • jonpelto

      Well put.

      Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

  • savage

    Interesting article about California’s struggles with the reformers. The final line presents the essential question:

    The BBC (Billionaire Boys’ Club), led by the Gates and Walton families, has unlimited money to bankroll
    public charter schools. Their opponents lack such resources but are rich other
    ways. Will the billionaires or everybody else prevail?

  • savage

    First of all, the guy who wrote that Huffpost article is just another attorney sticking his nose in where it doesn’t belong. Has he taught in an elementary school or a high school in a disadvantaged area? Not according to his bio. He is just another Stephan Pryor–an attorney with no teaching experience who thinks he knows better.

    I’m all for parents being able to choose a school for their kids. But have you read any of the other articles referenced on this site? Even the one that appears above your own post? Achievement First is barely outperforming Windham when you look at test scores, and is underperforming New London. And this despite a lower population of the “harder to teach” students, ie special ed., poor, non-English-speaking.

  • Wendylecker

    Let me get your rules straight.  When it’s a charter, we should listen to what parents want (btw wheres the evidence that most of Bport parents  wanted that), but if it’s state takeover we should listen to what the Superintendent wants? I heard New London parents testify- they wanted more money for their schools. They didn’t ask for state takeover.

  • CTVeteran

    Not at the high school level. You must pass CAPT to receive a mandatory credit to graduate.

    Funny though…i dont think a school would fail its whole popluation if the parent refuse to have their kids tested.

  • TMS

    Gwen, With all due respect to you, we know it’s much more than partisan politics. It’s theft of taxpayer’s dollars. I don’t profess to be an expert in education or in education funding, but I do know that my tax dollars are going towards paying the bill for AF, the Special Master, Pryor, Vallas and the other education reform scams. I decided to send my son to a prep school for high school and you didn’t pay a dime of it while my money was STILL going to my town and the rest of Connecticut’s public school systems. It was my choice and I paid for it with no regrets. If I followed your logic, I should have been able to take my tax dollars and use it for his education in the prep school of my choosing, but that did happen nor did I want it to. I have absolutely no objection to seeing ALL of our kids succeed and I know taking money away from those who can’t afford to do what I did (believe me, I struggled at times with the payments) is not the right thing to do because it penalizes those other kids.
    As a taxpayer, I should have the right to say how the money I pay into the system should be spent and where it should go. I want to see it go to teaching the kids critical thinking, not to test publishing companies, fake teachers and exclusionary charter schools who are only in it for the money.