Florida’s Standardized Testing Disaster – “Education Reform” At Its Worst

59 Comments

Like the car accident that you can’t take your eyes off of, the incredible standardized test debacle that is playing itself out in Florida is a stunning lesson about how out of control the “education reformers” have become.

Their mantra there, as it is here in Connecticut, is that standardized testing is the only way to force teachers to teach and children to learn.  Most importantly, they claim, the standardized tests are needed in order to evaluate which teachers to keep and which to remove.

As many now know, the Florida Department of Education recently released the test scores on their FCAT 2.0 standardized tests.  The percentage of Florida students who scored “at goal” had dropped from 81 percent to 27 percent.  Within twenty-four hours, Florida’s Board had met, reduced the number needed to reach goal and announced that, in fact, 4 out of 5 students did reach goal.

So much for the $254 million contract to develop and administer Florida’s testing program.

As we saw over the last five months, here in Connecticut Governor Malloy and the “education reformers” are demanding the creation of even more standardized tests.

Malloy’s original bill proposed a whole new round of testing in 11th grade and the bill that did pass will institute new testing in kindergarten through 3rd grade.

And still these reformers want more.

Like all students in Connecticut, Bridgeport’s students completed the statewide mastery tests in March.  But then, despite facing a budget shortfall and laying off dozens of teachers, School Superintendent Paul “education reformer extraordinaire” Vallas,  announced that he was instituting yet another full round of standardized tests in June because he believes that more testing is the only way to prevent teachers from allowing a “lull” in learning to take place in their classrooms.  As to the cost of this extra round of testing, Vallas says he got a very good deal.

An editorial commentary piece published this week in the Orlando Sentinel called up state officials to “”stop this madness.”

The commentator wrote;

“Of course, whether or not students learn should be part of a teacher’s and administrator’s evaluation, but when you have high stakes for students, teachers and administrators and little or no accountability for the $254 million contract lawmakers have given to the testing company, something is wrong.

Let us hold lawmakers and the testing company accountable, and let teachers teach and students learn. We must end high-stakes testing, and instead develop a system based on multiple forms of measurement that is fair for all.

Countries that we are often compared to, such as Finland and Singapore, do not use high-stakes testing to judge students and teachers. We should not, either.”

Yet Stefan Pryor, Governor Malloy’s Commissioner of Education, wants to INCREASE the number of standardized tests and require that school districts rely even more on the results.

Adding insult to injury, when he faced public criticism earlier this week, he and his team of out-of-state consultants went so far as to block the media and public from attending the meetings in which they were talking about these matters.

Although forced to change course and allow the media and public back in to the meetings, the Malloy Administration still doesn’t get it.

At the next meeting, Elizabeth Shaw, who works for Education First, Inc. and is one of Commissioner Pryor’s $60,000 short-term consultants to help him with his “education reform” initiative, announced “Something is different at this meeting. At this meeting — in the interest of transparency — the state department has invited the press to join us.”

Something different?  The media and public allowed into a public meeting?

But more to the point, Pryor and company continue down the path of implementing a system in which standardized tests play an even more important role in Connecticut’s schools.

The author of the Orlando Sentinel piece could not be more correct, it is time to stop this madness.  Our children, our teachers and the America’s public school system deserve.

 Side Note on Malloy’s Consultant (more to come on this piece): 

This Elizabeth Shaw, Pryor’s point person on expanding the use of standardized test in Connecticut?

Well she started her “education reform” career with Teach for America in Philadelphia (where Paul Vallas was heading the school system).  She quickly got promoted to TFA’s Director of District Strategy where her job was to “manage relationships” with the school district.  She then moved to the New Orleans Recovery School District (Yes, the one that Paul Vallas was the superintendent for) where she quickly moved up through the ranks to become Director of Human Resources.

Shaw then moved from New Orleans to join Education First, Inc.

Turns out Shaw is from Chicago, her father was one of Vallas’ biggest supporters when Vallas ran for Governor in Illinois and at least one Chicago blogger has reported that Shaw’s mother is best friends with Vallas’ wife.

And Education First, Inc.?  They are one of the firms that Pryor instructed SERC (the State Education Resources Center) to hire with state funds on a no-bid contract to help him with linking standardized tests and teacher evaluation.

What a strange coincidence that Paul Vallas is now in Bridgeport where he is being paid $229,000 while collecting a $1 million dollar contract from the State Board of Education in Illinois.

Be Sociable, Share!

  • Msavage51

    Someone posted this on the previous thread but I thought it was worth a “bump.” Congratulations, Jonathan, for some well-deserved recognition for your efforts:

    http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/ctnj.php/archives/entry/ctnewsjunkie_cttechjunkie_among_spj_winners_pelto_honored_with_foi_award/

    Re the cronyism  outlined above–how did we allow it to come to this?  More importantly–how do we fix it and take back our public educaton system? It’s so frustrating. I work with a group of supposedly non-partisan “concerned taxpayers” in my own town. I keep metioning this blog, and other sources of non-corporate-owned media, in the hopes that they’ll check out some of the issues. But because many of them are Republicans, I fear that they associate this site, and other non-traditional news sources, with liberals, and are therefore unwilling to even consider them as viable sources of information. Re public education and so many other issues (the potential impending economic catastrophe, the destruction of our environment, the manufactured need for more and more military might)–I feel like I’m a passenger on a train hurtling toward the side of a mountain. I’m trying to get the other passengers to pay attention but they won’t listen.

    • jonpelto

      Me too…. A train hurtling down the mountain – passing the bridge out signs – and no sign that anyone is pulling the brakes.

      Interestingly – I do get a lot of emails saying – while I don’t always agree with your political philosophy or even I didn’t agree at all – I’m leaning a lot and come to find out “what is really going on” so maybe, just maybe… a strange coalition can be built of people who say – you can’t have a philosophical debate if you can’t get access to the facts….

      If a range of people sharpen their pitch forks…..and decide there is a common interest to force change… perhaps, just perhaps there is hope.

      • Msavage51

        I’ve got to believe there’s hope–what’s the alternative? Just keep plugging away, I guess…

      • guest

        Amazing on the connections between Shaw, Pryor, Vallas, and TFA.  It is disheartening that no one in state government seems to care about what looks to be the blatant intrusion of corporate interests.

      • jonpelto

        I’m digging into at least two other similar situations in which personal relationships played some kind of role in a no-bid contract at the state level and in Windham and Bridgeport. Details and evidence are hard to come by but the appearance of a conflict of interest is so great that I think a few of these will rise to the level of requiring a state or federal investigation into wrong doing.

        Sadly we know that when state officials direct state contracts, bad things happen including people going to prison.

      • guest

        Well, it’s not as if Connecticut has not had a governor in prison before!
        How about a commissioner?

      • jschmidt2

         He resigned before he went to prison. So technically we didn’t have a governor in prison.

      • Follow the Money

         Go Jon! Keep it going. And congrats on the award – well deserved!

      • Jeff Klaus

        Jon,  I was part of an evil private sector cabal which together with the city of New Haven hatched a sinister plan to fund The New Teacher Project’s work in designing the “new” New Haven teacher eval system.  This is the system that my union brother Tom Burns supports with gusto.  I can tell you about the state of the New Haven eval system prior to the New Teacher Project’s work.  There wasn’t any.  None.  Nunca.  Nada. 
         
        So it seems to me that you and your followers can continue to put your energy into lots of collective wailing, hand-wringing, and dreaming up horror stories about false bogeymen –  or you can actually try to get something done by helping come up with some real student centered reforms.   Wanna know why you see the ”reformers” at the gates in places like New York, New Orleans, Philadelphia, Chicago, Bridgeport, New Haven, Windham etc?   Wanna know why you have been disappointed by all these true blue dems like Malloy and Obama?  Because you (you = left wing dems) are only offering the status quo as the alternative.  You’ve got to know that you don’t stand a chance if that’s the best you got. 

      • Linda174

        Mr. Klaus-Toll:

        Why do you slump so low as to post here? Don’t you have better things to do with your right wing theories and machinations.

        Jeff, get going on those two ELL charter schools and the recruiting and retention plans. Your attrition rate at Amistad is abysmal. Please help Dacia when you’re not busy at the bank…keep an eye on those embezzelers, too or we will have to create turn around banks and bring in Bankers for American to replace you and all the experts at JP Morgan.

        Hup Hup….get going…speed it up…pronto…practice what you preach in your own industry.

      • Linda174

        Don’t stand a chance….that’s laughable…the successful 5% of the charter schools (that represent a small % of the schools in the USA) are really going to save us all.  That’s the best you got….Teachers are very STUDENT CENTERED. WE spend the entire day with students. We don’t sit in a bank office and post on blogs because our spouse manages a few schools.  Quit your job, get ARC certificed and walk the walk, Mr. Klaus…do something besides bloviate.

        NY Times piece this week:

        Although Gates remains a supporter of charter schools, he realizes that charter schools alone will not solve the crisis in American education. “Even with rapid growth, it won’t reach 10 percent” of students, he says. True education reform requires engaging all of the country’s teachers.

        GET that Jeff…ALL of the country’s teachers..not just the Stepford Test Prep Drones!

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/4IUD4D2BEZMBUKPABNJJAY5CZU Thomas B

        Hi Jeff—good to see you posting under your real name–that makes you go up one notch in my book–but your statements above are totally false concerning The New Teacher Project–I will be the only Union person that will say that some of the stuff they brought to us was helpful–but we REJECTED 90% of what they brought and made our own plan–because you see real leaders and reformers use ORIGINAL thought when devising a great plan–they dont copy and follow people with self-serving agendas–how in the world can you site cities like New York, New Orleans, Philadelphia,  and on and on–they have achieved nothing and are at the bottom of the list of successful schools (unless cheating counts)–your friend Michelle Rhee knows how to cheat better than most–dont fear us because we have done it right in New Haven–and everyone is looking at OUR model as THE model–for it was done together–with buy-in from all players–
        Cant you see we are allowing GOOD charters to exist alongside public schools——-your wife’s charters are the good ones but not the solution–we can learn from each other as long as we dont become competitors—ya see charters didnt start out that way but they have morphed into that——-and now I question their integrity for they said they could do it better for less if we allowed them to exist———–and now that tune has changed—appalling——-
        Havent blogged with you in awhile–good to be back–Tom

      • guest

        Thomas B–the charters have a total teach-to-the-test using any uncertified TFA type drone model in order to get results on standardized tests that measure very little.  thus, the students who graduate from Amistad NH charter, with college acceptance in hand (half the number of 9th graders graduate, it seems) have struggled to complete one semester in college, as even the Amistad teachers admit and supposedly puzzle about.  I’ll tell them why (many are not real teachers, so when they are off their canned curriculum and their bubble-filling pablum, they throw up their hands)–passing a standardized test, even with a fantastic score, does not mean you know how to think, or that you’ve actually learned anything.
        Since we love to say Finland does this, and Singapore does that, and then some pundits claim that among the highest scoring US students, the difference between them and Finland/Singapore on the PISA test is comparable, all I have to say is most graduates in those countries are doing well, regardless of class, and second, once you’re off the test and in the realm of knowledge, even elite Americans can barely compete because in most of the rest of the world, students know two or more languages–I mean, really know–and most Americans make basic errors in their own native English and struggle with 19th century novels or earlier usage–something a High School graduate should be able to handle. 

      • Castles Burning

         And, such comments as your last sentence above and the spirit that they generate, are why you are so deserving of recent recognition (CONGRATS).  We need the research referenced by you and your readers and the connections, as guest below indicates, which are truly amazing.  Keep digging . . .

  • guest

    Excellent coverage and congratulations on the journalism award!
    Steven Adamowski is, as readers here can well guess, right there with Vallas and Pryor and the state of Florida on the absolute importance of standardized tests–so much so that, once the CMTs are over, so is the school year.  Adamowski has shortened Windham’s school calendar to the bare minimum required by the state and has shifted the start date of school so he can end the year in May!  right, nothing is going on after the CMTs.  Adamowski is also trying to find the right brand-name, patented reading program that teaches to the test and makes it easy for untrained personnel to deliver the proper bubble-filling instruction (i.e., the TFA corps members–they need lots of supplements and teaching aids themselves).

    • Msavage51

      Isn’t the shortened school year in direct conflict with the prevailing trend? I thought the push was toward a longer school year–not a shorter one.

      • guest

        Oh, you’ve been paying attention!  Unlike the Town of Windham, the BoE, the rep. Susan Johnson, etc, etc, who have decided to hand over all powers to the supreme Steven Adamowski.  And we have seen that when Adamowski has been on the job market, or pretending to care about the quality of classroom teaching, he mouths all the platitudes about longer school days, better teacher retention and “talent” development, etc, etc.  Once in power,though, he is quick to revert to the free market principles of decimate unions, teach to the test, demoralize students and parents, and other heinous acts.

      • Msavage51

        So WHAT exactly is Adamowski’s justification for shortening the school day? And how has he gotten the town BOE to go along with it? And what is Ana Ortiz’ role in all of this? While I’ve defended her for not having a chance to make changes in the district, her role as a “yes woman” has begun to erode at my sympathies.

      • guest

        Sorry, he is shortening the school YEAR.  We already have a shorter school day than, say West Hartford–and WH has more school days and very few early dismissals.  Adamowski is apparently strong-arming the teachers into working 15 minutes longer next year and 15 minutes longer the year after that (probably with no increase in pay)–but I’d rather have the extra days–what’s 15 minutes?  I believe that the shorter year will allow Adamowski to put a summer school program in place, run by one of his favorite corporate entities, like EASTConn using “scab” labor instead of teachers.  In this way he can more fully implement an “outsource” model–hey, maybe he can even beam in teachers from the same countries who now handle our tech questions and credit card bills, you know “Troy” from Mumbai…ur, Kentucky (I once had one of these very smart people try to convince me that they were from the Southern US, rather than south Asia).  As for Ortiz, she does know how to take orders.

      • jonpelto

        Guest – in Bridgeport Vallas was going to cut days to reduce this years budget and then when he had money add days for next year… Believing that we a way to get around the contract – if they work you have to pay but if you furlough you might not… I wonder if that is what he thinks he is up to.
        Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • guest

        sounds plausible!

      • Follow the Money

         That’s pretty funny. I once had a BoE member explain that if they decided to implement furlough days, teachers were still required to report and the kids would still be there because they couldn’t just cancel school! I asked how that would be a furlough day. It’s something else entirely, and probably not legal. I don’t think she liked that.

      • Msavage51

        I knew it was a shortened year in question–I misspoke (typed). But how does he convince the board to go against the tide of a longer day? Do you think they’re unaware of the trend or just too cowed by Adamowski to question him.

  • jschmidt2

    “Countries that we are often compared to, such as Finland and Singapore,
    do not use high-stakes testing to judge students and teachers. We should
    not, either.”
    So what do they use that would pass muster with the unions who I don’t see as supportive of enforcing any teacher reviews or standards since the assume all teachers are good teachers?

    • jonpelto

      I’ll let someone with the unions respond, but my sense was that like any profession, there are a wide range of factors that go into evaluations. Testing could certainly be an element but most job performance reviews includes observation, self-identification of issues, peer review, time allocation, etc.

      The piece I find most interesting and frustrating is that CT has one of the longest probationary periods in the country – 4 years – meaning that a teacher can be dismissed for any reason during that period. Principals have plenty of work, but one of their most fundamental tasks to review and evaluate teachers. When teachers are let go they are usually let go for economic reasons but there is no excuse for administrators not to know after 4 years whether this is a teacher that is or is not capable of doing the job.

      There are undoubtedly teachers that “go bad” or “get lazy” but as a small business owner I only had a 6 month probationary period and I was able to determine in that amount of time whether the employee was right for my company or not. I then had an annual review in which it started with the employees self-assessment and went from there including attendance, input the rest of the staff and a review process with the clients that the person had worked with.

      Since you only have one “standardized” test a read – I’d much prefer teachers begin the school year working to identify where child are on the spectrum of knowledge and skills and then require teachers to document how they went about moving each child forward.

      But hopefully a teacher union person will weigh in —-

      • jschmidt2

         Agree with your probationary analysis except that it is so difficult to fire a teacher that after a typical business 6 months it just makes the judgement cycle much shorter. So perhaps districts use that 4 years to counter the difficulty factor. In private business you still need to document after probation that an employee has failed to remediate written up problems, but for teachers it almost seems impossible to fire even with evidence due to the long union bargaining process. And of course while that long process continues, the employee is still teaching with a bad attitude and getting paid. So it is not fair to the kids.
        My sense is that unions don’t want to leave it in the hands of administrators to review teachers and use that  as the only method of review, they don’t want test scores to be used. So what is acceptable to unions?

      • Follow the Money

         J, not sure I understand your comment that “it is so difficult to fire a teacher that after a typical business 6 months it just makes the judgment cycle much shorter”. Could you please clarify what you mean?

        In CT, a new teacher can be dismissed any time within the first 90 days, and administration does not need to give any reason. This can also happen at any time during that 4-year probationary period, and the individual does not have any recourse. The media has done a stellar job promoting the myth that it’s impossible to fire a teacher for poor performance. It simply is not true, and I can say this with certainty because I have been involved in dismissal proceedings as a building representative for my association. What the union bargained for is called due process – the right to a fair dismissal, and like the private sector which enjoys the same, it simply guarantees that your district will follow the state law if it has opted to fire you. It is NOT a job for life.

        And for the record, that individual who is still teaching kids and getting paid while being targeted as ineffective is also subject to intensive supervision during this time, and that may mean submitting plans, having an assigned mentor, repeated observations and critique by an administrator, meetings, required classes, or whatever the administration deems necessary. It’s not as cut and dried as it may seem to the public.

        As to what is acceptable to me, as a teacher, is a fair and comprehensive evaluation, with a test like CMT accounting for far less than what has been proposed. I would prefer to see student progress over the course of one year included as a larger part of an evaluation as a measurement of progress, like they do in Finland. A single test cannot show that. One test does not show what a teacher can or cannot do, and is completely dependent on the kids taking it on that particular day. Take a look at New York City and how their test scores were published by the New York Post with teacher names, ranking the teachers accordingly. The news crowed that now, finally, they could evaluate teachers and show who was the best, and the worst. It caused quite a stir, with parents demanding their child NOT have “that” teacher. The only problem was that the teacher who was at the bottom showed up near the top the following year, and #1 fell from grace. Why? They had different students that following year. Their methods had not changed – why would the teacher ranked  #1 change anything he/she did? So how would it be if your entire job performance evaluation was based on one 20 minute observation by a superior of you doing your job? What if everything that could go wrong, did, at that exact time of your evaluation? Would you want that to be your only determining factor?  No? The same could be said for high stakes testing.

      • jschmidt2

         It may be easier to fire bad teachers, but what about marginal ones? A private employer can fire at any time with proper tracking of bad performance, coaching,and record keeping. Teachers and administrators have way too much paperwork required by state and feds. They need less of that potentially more coaching by master teachers who can help improve their performance. I’m not sure the whole idea of giving pay increases based on more degrees make sense unless the additional degree also comes with more responsibilty.Private business reward increased responsibility with promotions and raises. Automatic raises rewards the marginal teachers and the good ones equally. That just creates an attitude of mediocrity. Private business also is getting rid of pensions for 401k. Public employees need to finance more of their retirement and including overtime in pensions is ridiculous, probably not an issue for teachers.. Teachers need to overcome the notion that they just work 180 days a year as much of the public believes. and the union leadership has always pushed the idea that if you give the teachers more money it is the answer to everything. The unions have not done the teachers justice. More money has not helped Hartford. But that is not the teachers fault. Administration, politicians have never fixed the  problems of inner city schools/

      • Sue

         If you could make your query more succinct, I’ll forward it on.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/4IUD4D2BEZMBUKPABNJJAY5CZU Thomas B

        That is exactly what we do–where is the kid at the start and how did I help him grow –where is he now—-but not just making the decision by a test score–there is NO validity in this–but by using multiple measures to see how our students have grown throughuot the year–Tom Burns VP NHFT Local 933 and proud of all of our teachers and staff in New Haven–

    • CTVeteran

      J,

      Believe it or not, the NEA and more specifically the CEA are very big on localized evaluation plans. What do the parents want? What do the Universities want to see? What job skills will be necessary for students who want to directly into the work force?

      Pasi Sahlberg (do a search and listen to this guy talk, he is amazing) stresses that while Finland has a loose structure for all schools to follow, each school and more imporantly their teachers, administrators and parents work towards creating systems that meet the needs for their children. Community needs over that of the politicians and corporations.

      I am a rep. for the one of the local unions. I dont always agree with what the NEA or CEA have to say, but right now they are busy trying to keep proven FAILED strategies from entering our classrooms.

      I know people dont want to hear this, but what we need is for BOE’s and Superintendant’s offices to be shrunk and we need more mid-level adminstrators who can spend their days going into classrooms instead of disciplining students all day. We need Special Ed. Law and Statutes to be revisted because the truth is districts can not afford the costs. And I know I will sound horrible saying this, but no amount of money, standardized testing or teacher evaluation is going to make some of our more special needs children ready for college…ever.

      Please J, keep asking questions. We need this type of positive dialogue, not the spew that comes out of people like Michelle Rhee’s voice. My collegues (sp?) and I do not want bad or poor performing teachers working with us, they make us look bad. As a union rep I have worked with administrators to “council” people out of the field where necessary.

      Also, a little know fact is that when this “counciling” takes place, teachers resign to save themselve the humiliation of being fired or “non-renewed”. So when a study says “only 5% of teachers let go were tenured” it does not account for the teachers that resigned.

      Sorry for the long-winded response, but this is what we need. Put politics aside and work towards giving our children (I have two of my own) what they need. Not what is going to give Pearson a bigger test contract.

      • Magister

        That is a good point about the face-saving resignations of poor teachers. Most of the poor teachers I’ve known did leave in this way, and are not part of the statistics about firings or magical “tenure protection.”

      • jschmidt2

         good response. It is almost like there are 2 worlds the teachers live. THe world of the NYC rubber rooms where teachers mark time and get paid,  the Hartford failed system, to the smaller town schools which have fewer problems and Malloy wants regionalize. Do you know if the teachers of Finland or Singapore are unionized?

      • CTVeteran

        The NYC rubber rooms should never have come into existance. States are allowed to have separate laws concerning education, I dont think that approach would ever find a life here, although I know of teachers who were related/connected messing up and getting moved into positions where they couldnt cause as much damage.

        Unions are a Constitutional entity. I am not sure if those two countries you mentioned have them or more importanlty, would even need them. I am ignorant on Asia’s approach to teachers, but in Finland its a socialized country so my guess is their teachers are probably under some government system. That being said, the USA might simply be too large to try and fully adopt some of the top-performing countries education plans. Also, a Finnish teachers, teaches 95% Finnish children. In one of my classes I have 4 different languages and at least three different ethnic backgrounds, and I am in a suburb. Those numbers skyrocket in the urban districts. Hense ELL being such a huge issue in standardized testing.

        Malloy is trying to play CT taxpayers for a fool. His numbers dont tell the whole story. CT wants to break many districts that dont need fixing. He plays the numbers game because when you add up the 4-5 biggest districts you get the biggest % of students. But realistically 80%+ of our districts are doing a great job. If we could be like the charter schools and be selective in our students those percentages would be higher.

      • Follow the Money

         I know it’s been said here before, but just to reiterate: when they report on the state’s achievement gap, they always focus on those districts that are very low. But what they never focus on is that our kids – that 80%+ mentioned by CTVeteran – are some of the highest scoring districts in the country.

      • guest

        I do hate the gap, and some of it is due to entrenched racism and classicism.  But in Connecticut, the standard is higher at all levels, so the passing level elsewhere is more like proficient, whereas here it is the higher goal level.  I am not defending low standards, but one cannot meaningfully compare one state to another because each state sets the standard, and Connecticut’s proficient level is more in line with what other states expect.  (Or so I’ve heard.  Other states also have easier tests–or totally absurd ones.)

      • jonpelto

        Finland (my father’s homeland) is definitely unionized. I don’t think you can live there and not be unionized …
        Good question on Singapore – my guess is not – but I’ll check.

        And just as we’ve seen the corporatization of everything else, there is certainly a concern that some unions (or union leadership) have become a professional class that think like corporate people.

        Personally, I think people make a mistake to say the choice is evaluation no evaluation….and I think most teachers believe in evaluation. It must be really frustrating to work and work and work on curriculum and class prep and then have the teacher across the hall stroll in and hand out a worksheet and call it a day.

        But one would think there has got to be a good way to have an evaluation system.

        And student achievement should be an element – the issue with the standardized testing is that with so many factors coming into play – how do you standardize it – so to speak. I’ve asked these reformers over and over again – if you are in Farmington where 85% of the kids are at goal – is staying at 85% or even going to 86% better than, worse than or the same as the inner city teacher taking a class from 35% to 40%.

        What if you get 5 additional non- speaking students in 5th grade – we know those kids are scoring at just a fraction of what the English speaking kids are getting – first off we teach math and science in English and then the test them in English and then we say why aren’t they scoring better – millions of non-English speaking kids excel at math and science so it can’t be “biological” J – which means it is a language barrier – so the 5th grade teacher gets 5 students who are proficient in English and her test scores drop 40%. Do we fire him or her? And last but not least – the exam is in March and you get the results in the summer. Are we comparing what the teacher did from the year before? So that means we are putting no responsibility on the teacher from the year before? A portion of the kids then come into the 5th grade teacher ready to learn, another group come in without having some skills developed. The 5th grade teacher then is evaluated on how he or she does with a group that has come in – in very different positions to take advantage of that teacher’s skills.

        The more you try to figure out the logistics the less the standardized tests seem the appropriate vehicle and yet the “reformers” say that up to 50% or even more of the teacher’s evaluation should be based on the standardized test scores. Such a model would never fly in the private sector.

        And when one brings up these issues – the response is – so you are for the status quo….

        Ah… no, I just don’t think your solution works so if you’ll stop spinning around in circles for a moment maybe we can try and figure it out.

        Is it 5pm someplace yet? J

      • jschmidt2

         lots of variables. No good answer except we know the current system depending on standardized testing doesn’;t work. I’m glad my kids are grown. All 3 went to public elementary/middle school. 2 went to public high and the last went to  private high because the public HS had a huge enrollment spurt and the quality of education surroundings went down in my estimation. But it is the parents I;’m convinced that make a huge difference in systems. My wife was very involved in the lower grades, volunteering, and making sure the teachers were challenged when needed. Most of the parents were like that and the results were good.

      • CTVeteran

        J, if more parents were involved education would skyrocket.

        Look at our trends.

        1 working parent vs 2 working parents

        More ELL students in this country than ever

        More standardized testing than ever before

        The ratio of salaries across economic classes.

        All this and we are demanding more of our teachers now then we ever have before and we are failing in education.
        How they heck did we ever compete in the space race then?

        There was a great essay written by the principal of Staples High comparing what it took to get into Yale in the 1950′s vs now… If anyone can find and post it, it really speaks to the trend of education.

      • jschmidt2

         Space race was one by those who went to school in the 50s and college in the 60s. THose were the days of homogeneous classrooms, discipline, learning by rote as a basic. Remember we went to the moon using slide rulers and rudimentry computers. We didn’t start major experimentation in the classroom until the 60s and that’s when education started going downhill. It was change for the sake of change to handle the non homogeneous classrooms that resulted form the white flight out of the cities. And discipline went with it.

      • TMS

        , “It was a change for the sake of change to the non-homogeneous classrooms that resulted from the white flight out of the cites. And discipline went with it.”

        Could please clarify what you mean by this sentence. I’d like to get a better understanding of your perspective.

      • jschmidt2

         Back in the 50s and 60s the cities( I refer to NYC) changed in the complexity of population. So did the classrooms. THe culture was not trained in absorbing this major change that affected, learning and discipline. So the schools in the inner city changed form a balanced middle class, to a poor immigrant class. The 60s brought experimentation in how to handle this and moved away from learning the basics by rote. I’m not sure that helped.

      • guest

        total BS

      • jschmidt2

        Intellectual rebuttal.

      • Follow the Money

         ” It must be really frustrating to work and work and work on curriculum
        and class prep and then have the teacher across the hall stroll in and
        hand out a worksheet and call it a day.”

        You have no idea! Even in those smaller suburban districts, it is problematic.

        As for more and more testing, they have to make their case and “identify” those so-called failing districts so they can prime them for “reorganization” and the final takeover by private corporations. Keeping the churn going is what it’s all about, and pushing more testing will accomplish that goal. In addition, I’ve said this before – the common core standards are being introduced in this state. There will be a newly designed test in 2014 that tests to those standards. However, teachers will, in the interim year or so, be responsible for teaching what is in the current CT state standards to prepare for CMT and CAPT, AND introducing the new CCSS, especially in the K-3 range, where the new test will be phased in. So when districts have huge numbers who fail it in the first year due to no real understanding on the part of beleaguered teachers of the standards, no truly compatible published teaching materials (although publishers are making hefty claims) and no really effective way of knowing that you’re doing it correctly, what then?

        Everything is hurry, hurry, hurry, because there’s no time to waste. They will not allow time to really understand the changes, because that might mean success. The result will be half-a$$ed and ineffective, and who will they blame? The teachers. Again. Still…

      • guest

        I hate these tests!
        My condolences to the teachers and students.
        Be a hero, take a zero.  there should be a mass opt-out.  Seriously.  Let’s really think about just massively saying NO next March when the CMT rolls out.  Or even before–just blithely refuse to teach to the test.

      • guest

        Finland has strong and well-respected unions.

      • Msavage51

        “I know people dont want to hear this, but what we need is for BOE’s and Superintendant’s offices to be shrunk and we need more mid-level adminstrators who can spend their days going into classrooms instead of disciplining students all day. We need Special Ed. Law and Statutes to be revisted because the truth is districts can not afford the costs. And I know I will sound horrible saying this, but no amount of money, standardized testing or teacher evaluation is going to make some of our more special needs children ready for college…ever.”

        Agreed re the reduction of the role of superintendents. Where I live we have a full-time supt. making $140K for less than 1,000 students. Her primary role seems to be to manipulate data in order to get the BOE to provide her with the funding that she wants. She has been provided with a stipend to complete her PhD for more than six years now, and she still doesn’t have her degree. The town would be better off reducing her to half time and paying another assistant for the second school–someone who would actually be IN the building, every day, observing teachers and taking care of disciplinary problems.

        Re. BOEs–I’m not certain that I agree with shrinking the role of BOEs. Isn’t there a need for elected members of the public to oversee administrators? Especially considering that in a small town such as mine, none of the administrators actually LIVE in town? Of course, if a BOE is going to be nothing but a rubber-stamper for the supt., what good are they doing?

        Re special ed. statues–agreed that the burden on districts is excessive.

      • CTVeteran

        My concern with the BOE is that they mismanage funds constantly and sell it as the “Superintendants Vision”. Why do police, firefighters and othe town employees negotiate directly with the mayor, but teachers have to negotiate with the BOE? Here is my plan. Remove teachers salaries from the budget and move it under the town. Let us directly negotiate with the Mayors. Then all the money a town would ask for would have to be fully accounted for and BOE’s wouldnt be able to scapegoat the teachers salary as the reason they are short from year to year.

        BOE’s for the most part are not educators. They are politicians who crave the little power they get from having a title. Building administrators are more then capable to tell the town what they need to run thier schools. That being said I do not agree with regionalization since I believe communities should be allowed to prioritize what is important to them. Stefan Pryror doesnt know #$#% about Windham and neither did Adamowski for that matter. Having been a student in that system, the fixes that they are all trying to use to fix Windham wont work. Testing doesnt change culture. And Adamowski is just going to break the schools up to make numbers look good. Its called Simpson’s Paradox. Its a statistical term used to describe the manipulation of numbers.  

      • Sue

         It can’t be that excessive where I work, because in the 15 years I’ve taught special education, I’ve never received a teacher’s manual, off level books (as mandated by our contract), or paraprofessionals (as mandated by a student’s IEP).

        Must be my over-the-top salary.

      • Follow the Money

         Well said, CTVeteran. I might add to J to please, please stop and think when the media presents their typical union-bashing rhetoric, and talks in terms of “all teachers”, because it is never that black-and-white. The CEA is NOT against teacher evaluation – in fact, being teachers themselves, they strongly advocate a fair and consistent evaluation system – something that is NOT in place as of yet. CEA also endorsed a Professional Standards committee for teachers, similar to what other professions have, that has been shot down by the legislature year after year.

        CTVeteran is absolutely correct in saying that the statistics do not show that poorly performing teachers were counseled out of the field. I, myself, have been involved in several instances in my tiny district where an ineffective teacher has resigned instead of going through the very public humiliation of a termination hearing, and that includes teachers with tenure. Those numbers are not reported as a non-renewal.

        More standardized testing is not even close to a fair and accurate way to evaluate students OR teachers. The only benefit is to the publishers of these wretched materials.

  • Linda174

    On a positive note congratulations to Jon and his recent recognition by the Society of Professional Journalists. Keep it coming Jon….we need you!

    http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/ctnj.php/archives/entry/ctnewsjunkie_cttechjunkie_among_spj_winners_pelto_honored_with_foi_award/

    On my usual cynical note, read all about Pryor’s machinations. I predicted he would try to circumvent the PEAC process to get what he wanted. He sure is a sneaky, crafty, sly lawyer.  He says he is staying out of it and just observing. Well, that’s because he already chose his personal corporate cronies to infiltrate the committees and push his agenda.  He can’t even enage in a conversation with real CT teachers (as pointed out in the last post – best Pryor reform story of 2012), but he sure can manipulate a system to suit his “philosophy”…whatever it may be. Read more:

    Understanding the process employed by PEAC with Commissioner Pryor at the helmCommissioner Pryor has hired a large number of out-of-state consultants, at least six of whom have been exerting a heavy hand in trying to direct nearly a dozen subcommittees and work groups and meeting with the different stakeholder groups separately, and over CEA’s objections—leading to very different understandings, controversy, and in our opinion, a lack of clarity on the issue. We are now in a position where the teacher unions and those representing management (CABE, CAPSS, and CAS) believe we agreed to a very different framework.
    We have continuously raised our concerns about the process of meeting separately with each group and have characterized it as a “divide and conquer” approach—leading each group to agree to very different concepts in order to get consensus.

  • Linda174

    I hope I don’t offend anyone, but we need a laugh and it’s Friday and I am happily opening a bottle of Kendal Jackson. Please watch (if you are a parent we love your kids, but this is still funny) -

    • Msavage51

      That is hilarious! Thanks for sharing.

    • guest

      Even my daughter laughed (my kid, I mean).

    • Magister

      Hilarious! That’s been circulating around my school’s faculty lately.

  • Linda174
  • Follow the Money

    It is sickening, and they will never stop pushing this agenda. They are insisting that MORE testing should be included in the teacher evaluation plan to the point that the different sides are now hearing different versions from these “consultants”. Just more confusion and divisiveness, right down to Cirasuolo insisting that we will all be using a teacher portfolio to be submitted as part of evaluation. That misinformation, along with PEAC agreeing to more testing being included (they did not agree to this) is still going on, full steam ahead. 

  • j0727ohn

    from the NYPOST- THis is what the public sees.
    The “rubber rooms” have bounced back. They’re just smaller and scattered now.More than 200 NYC educators suspected of misconduct or incompetence are hidden in offices all over the city.In the infamous rubber rooms that closed in 2010, up to 770 castoffs were jammed into several giant rooms. Now no more than a handful sit in exile at each place.They are tucked into cubicles, ignored at empty desks or confined to lunchrooms. Some do clerical work, like answering phones and making copies, but many are still just warehoused — and just as idle as their predecessors in the old holding pens, inmates told The Post.A total of 187 tenured teachers have been yanked from class, plus 20 others, such as supervisors and social workers, said Department of Education spokeswoman Marge Feinberg.