HELP! HELP! They’ve Fallen into the GAAP and they Can’t Get Up

15 Comments

Hey Buddy, didn’t you see the sign.  It says “MIND THE GAAP.”

The issue was one of candidate Dan Malloy’s most important campaign promises and on January 3, 2011 it was the topic of my very first post here on Wait, What?;  MIND THE GAAP – Confronting the Cost of Fiscal Honesty.

Candidate Malloy had made it abundantly clear, he was going to put Connecticut fiscal house in order and that meant moving the state to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, the modern accounting system.

My first post (link above) provides some background on the whole GAAP issue, but my assessment begins with the observation that with Malloy’s commitment, “we will get a firsthand look at the underlying cost of introducing Fiscal Honesty to the state’s budget. Why…because one of Governor-elect Dan Malloy and Lt. Governor-Elect Nancy Wyman’s most significant campaign promises was to move Connecticut government to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).   Connecticut requires all cities, towns and boards of education to adhere to GAAP standards; it just exempts itself from these common sense requirements.”

Beware the GAAP

My post went on to say “during this year’s gubernatorial campaign Dan Malloy and Nancy Wyman repeatedly pledged that moving Connecticut to GAAP accounting was the single most important way to ensure greater honesty and transparency in state budgeting…and then I concluded with “The task is a noble, important and worthy one.  Connecticut state government should be required to conduct itself using this basic accounting system.  There is only one problem; shifting the State to GAAP will cost $1.2 billion dollars.  That’s $1.2 billion on-top of the $3.7 billion dollar budget short fall Connecticut is facing for next year.”

So, the day Governor Malloy was sworn into office, he signed an Executive Orders requiring the state start utilizing GAAP principles.

A month later, after they realized a rapid shift to GAAP was prohibitively expensive, Malloy proposed a state budget that made a $75 million down payment this year and another $50 million down payment next year, followed by a 15 year $150 million dollar a year payment schedule that would complete the transition to GAAP and allow Connecticut to properly manage its state budget and finance system.   While the implementation was now scheduled to take place over 17 years and not immediately as he had promised, it was still a step forward.

All this year, even when Malloy’s budget office was begrudgingly forced to admit there might be a budget deficit, Governor Malloy, OPM Chief, Ben Barnes and anyone else with the authority to speak for the Governor stuck to their talking points, pledging that the State would find the funds to make that critical first payment toward its 17-year GAAP conversion process.

And then, quietly, in the middle of the chaos that is known as the last few days of the legislative session, the Malloy administration did it…they withdrew their commitment to make the $75 million payment this year and chose to forego the opportunity to take that first baby step toward fiscal accountability.

Speaking on behalf of Governor Malloy, Gian-Carl Casa, of the Office of Policy and Management, admitted to CTMirror’s Keith Phaneuf that “we do remain committed to GAAP…We are hopeful we will have a surplus at the end of FY 13 and can apply that to GAAP.”

The Malloy Administration is “hopeful” that you will have a surplus next year and can then begin the conversation toward GAAP?

Hopeful?

As a direct result of this administration’s bad fiscal policy decisions and the faltering economy, Connecticut’s next budget is already a half a billion dollars in deficit and they’re telling the public that they are “hopeful” that there will be a surplus so they can begin the GAAP conversion process that they had promised.

Oh, and when a reporter recently asked Malloy whether his new budget changes (including forgoing the GAAP payment) preserved his campaign pledges, Malloy was heard to say  ”Yeah, I think it does…Yeah, I absolutely think it does.”

But perhaps the biggest kick of all is that as part of the budget changes that the Malloy Administration and Legislature made this week, they voted to remove the language that said if there was a surplus this year it would go toward the GAAP payment.  Instead, the law now reads that if, by some miracle there is a budget surplus, the money will automatically be shifted into next year’s budget.

For more see CTMirror’s http://ctmirror.com/story/16269/despite-governors-pledges-gaap-conversion-officially-deferred-close-budget-deficit

Be Sociable, Share!

  • sharewhut

    What’s in Box #1 or behind Curtain #2…either way taxpayers get Zonked!

  • guest

    So, the governor’s performance reveals an achievement gaap?  His accountability is dismal.  Well, I say balance the budget on the backs of poor children.

  • guest

    Steven Adamowski has recently detailed the special “gap-closing” course taken by all Teach for America temps (this clearly outweighs any kind of education degree or master’s)–perhaps TFA could take the Governor aside, and give him an accelerated version of GAAP closing?

    • Magister

      Any links? I am curious about the situation there.

      • guest

        Well, it is not totally accurate, but try the Windham public schools website, here is a link to the most recent BoE meeting agenda, complete with powerpoint (I notice that these are very similar to his meetings in Hartford as Superintendent–he is a very standardized guy, leading standardized meetings with standardized power points promoting standardized teaching with standardized test prep):
        http://www.windham.k12.ct.us/twiki/pub/Main/BOEAgendasAndMinutes/BoEPacket_May92012Rev.pdf
        If you can slog throught this–better than sitting through the live presentation, which can last over 2 hours–it says something about assessments as a strategy.
        Note also the idea of having a permanent fundraising group, which, Adamowski said, was not going to contribute money for resurfacing the High School track or anything “neutral” like that, but would raise money in order to hold the BoE’s “feet to the fire” to make sure they comply with “school reform”.  I guess we can say that money talks in Windham.
        Where are the hedge fund philanthropists?
        As for TFA and gap closing, I’m working on getting my hands on that!  Any folks out there who want to pose as a “fresh out of college” elite school grad wishing to make a difference in the lives of the poor children they never noticed before?

  • Guest

    How can applying GAAP to our budgetary processes cost such an astronomical sum? We hire an outside agency such as KPMG, Deloitte, or PWC to train our financial people in GAAP best practices for a few months and we should be easily ready to apply GAAP to future and past budgets.

    I don’t see how this is a $1,000,000,000 effort.

    We need a drastic change in leadership and we need it now!

    • jonpelto

      Its an excellent question. I need to find a link that explains why its so much. Think of it this way. Basic accounting requires that all your income and expenditures show up on the same sheet – and CT has spent or has bills of over a billion dollars but they don’t show up on our balance sheet – when you bring everything onto the same “year” you have this massive hole – so over the next 17 years we “pay-down” that massive hole. When it is paid off we can then show everything together…. Even re-reading what I wrote it doesn’t make sense. I’ll find a better description or maybe someone else can articulate the problem in a more sensible way. Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • Guest

        Unless they began to implement gaap when auditing this year and found a bigger financial hole than using older practices.

      • Hookandhackle

         And that’s exactly the issue. By using the GAAP method creative accounting disappears and the reality of a much larger deficit will set in. They don’t have to pay 1 billion for implementation. They have to pay off all the bills that creative accounting has created over the years.

    • savage

      I was trying to understand this as well. Reading the article linked in an earlier post by Jon helped me a lot. Take a look at this article, if you haven’t already:

      http://www.ctmirror.org/story/8536/conversion-gaap-means-kicking-bad-fiscal-habits .

  • Guest

    Of course if we apply GAAP to our State’s financial processes goodness knows what auditors will find. Hmmmmm….. Makes you wonder.

  • jonpelto

    Teaching?

    Don’t tell me you’re another one of those teach a person to fish types – if we teaxh everyone to fish – who will make our plastic widgets .
    Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

  • anniemil

     From my personal experience, all “instruction” in CT public schools has morphed into data-driven. There’s no other way. To quote a former director, “Data doesn’t lie.”

    • jonpelto

      Now that is a funny line! In need to find a way to quote that – data doesn’t lie. The other great thing, if course, is that data doesn’t tell the truth either,,,,

      Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • anniemil

        No kidding! There are so many ways to skew the data collection process. Such craziness.