Malloy’s 2012 Education Reform Initiative: It’s Not Whether You Win or Lose, But How You Spin the News…

49 Comments

In the days and hours before the Connecticut legislature voted on the big “Education Reform” bill, Governor Malloy and his “education reform” allies where blasting Connecticut’s Democratic legislators. The attacks included the observation that Democrats were “killing hope in Connecticut,” that Democrats were dedicating to preventing “any real accountability [in] teacher performance,” that Democrats were “committed to the status quo” and, one of my favorites, that Democratic “legislative leaders continue to turn a deaf ear to the pleas [of Connecticut’s children].”

Despite that onslaught, many Democratic legislators remained focused on putting together a bill that actually helped, rather than hurt, Connecticut’s children, parents, teachers and schools.

With the help of teachers, teacher unions and other community groups, legislators held tough and developed a bill that included a number of positive policy changes while dumping a significant majority of Malloy’s negative initiatives.

In the coming days, we’ll be looking at some of the various provisions of the final bill.  However, an honest assessment of the package would lead one to conclude that Governor Malloy and the so-called reformers “won” about 20 percent of the controversial items he was pushing, while losing about 80 percent of those bad public policy concepts.

Normally, losing 80% of your proposals would be cause for concern, however, this is politics and in politics, if you proclaim – over and over again – that you are the victor, then there are some who will undoubtedly believe you.

As reported in the CT Mirror, “Dannel P. Malloy took to the radio airwaves in New York Tuesday to celebrate the changes to the education system and teacher tenure he has won in the education bill making its way through the Connecticut legislature.”

Malloy, who had proposed the most anti-teacher, anti-labor bill of any Democratic Governor in the nation, lost nearly all of those anti-teacher, anti-labor provisions as a result of the Democratically controlled General Assembly.

Of course, Malloy still managed to call it “his bill” as well as saying it was a “landmark” development.  He told the radio listeners that “what is important is Connecticut is joining other states, finally, in reforming pre-K through 12 education.”

In addition to Malloy’s comments, some of the best political spin came from two of the major corporate groups that shifted their message 180 degrees in the last 24 hours.

Rae Ann Knopf, the executive director of the Connecticut Council for Education Reform, a gaggle of Connecticut’s largest corporations and the group that has said “poverty was not an important factor when it came to influencing educational outcomes,” wrote that with this new bill, “Connecticut took a major step toward resuming its rightful place as a haven for enlightened education and a leader in championing the civil rights of all its citizens.

The very people, who were only hours before lamenting the utter disaster, now proclaimed that “Governor Malloy took a bold stance and proposed a massive comprehensive reform bill….the Governor never wavered on the importance of systemic change to ensure all children will end up with access to a high quality education in Connecticut.”

Meanwhile, Patrick Riccards ConnCAN’s CEO spent the last few months attacking Connecticut’s Democratic legislators on behalf of charter schools.  But yesterday he wrote “Governor Malloy put the stake in the ground and called on the legislature to enact the types of reforms that will no doubt result in better outcomes for our students. Though the road was quite rocky, the governor, education commissioner, and legislative leaders demonstrated a steadfast commitment to reaching an agreement.  In the end, and on behalf of Connecticut’s students, the General Assembly was able to enact meaningful reform.”

While the reformers are spending the days congratulating themselves on a bill that doesn’t include the worst of their ideas, there are still some very controversial and potentially damaging changes that were put into the bill, along with a variety of positive changes.

On the downside, the bill does virtually nothing to deal with the fact that Connecticut’s Educational Cost Sharing Formula remains at least $800 million underfunded, meaning local taxpayers continue to pick up a huge and unfair amount of the costs for running Connecticut’s schools.

Also, the same day Governor Malloy backed off his promise to make the initial payment to move Connecticut to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, he celebrated the education bill’s requirement that all towns adopt “a common chart of accounts so that we can understand how schools and districts spend education dollars.”  A great idea, no doubt, but one that is yet another unfunded mandate since it will cost towns to implement, costs that the state is not picking up.  Something about it being really important that towns be fiscally honest but the state – not so much.

Incredibly, the new education reform bill also adds MORE standardized tests.  Not satisfied with the annual standardized tests in grades 3 – 10, Connecticut will now require a new set of standardized reading tests for kindergarteners, first graders, second graders and third graders.

Faced with large class sizes, this state government isn’t providing any more money for extra instructional aides to help these young children get more one on one reading help, but there will be hundreds of thousands for dollars for developing and implementing new tests.

The education reform bill also requires that all elementary teachers take a reading instruction exam.  Despite the fact that there is absolutely no evidence that teacher’s don’t know how to teach reading and lots of evidence that teachers don’t have the time or support staff to provide the help each child needs, the state’s solution is to test the teachers.  As one veteran state senator said “Our kids are not reading… This will fix that.”  Ah…okay.

And, of course, the charter schools are happy since although they don’t get all of the new money they want this year, the full amount will be phased in over the next three years.  Even with the reduced amount, Achievement First, Inc., with its 3,000 students, will get more new state money this year than New Britain’s entire school system with its 10,854 students.

In fact, thanks to the charter school’s effective lobbying effort, each charter school student will see a boost in state taxpayer support this July of $1,100 per students while the 200,000 Connecticut students in the 30 poorest school districts will see a state funded increase of about $150 per student.

But if you overlook all those things, and a few more unfunded mandates and strange policy changes, there are some positive provisions in the education reform bill, as well.

Check back here at Wait, What? over the coming days for more details.

Also take a look at the following articles;

http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/ctnj.php/archives/entry/house_unanimously_sends_education_reform_to_malloy/

http://ctmirror.com/story/16286/education-reform-bill-clears-legislature

http://www.courant.com/news/education/hc-house-education-reform-0509-20120508,0,5150853.story

http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Education-reform-bill-heads-to-Malloy-3541980.php

Be Sociable, Share!

  • Buygoldandprosper

    Why was the Connecticut  Governor in NYC announcing his reformation?
    How many times do Christie or Cuomo come to Connecticut to tout their
    “wins”.

     

    • jonpelto

      That’s where the votes are?

      Actually I think he was on the phone

    • THREEFIFTHS2004

      Because him and Billionaireberg(Mayor bloomberg) are cut from the same cloth.

      • Buygoldandprosper

        Dan is lace curtain Irish looking for handouts. Mike is a self-made (sort of) gillionaire.
        We need leadership that wants to work in Hartford for the people of Connecticut. Maybe Dan gets out of town so much because his wife got a nice job in Hartford passing out state money? For votes? Nah! That is just a horrible random thought.

    • Linda174

      The purpose of the radio interview was for Malloy to promote Malloy…it had nothing to do with children, teaching and learning.  This is about Dan spinning himself….something he is very good at.

  • CONconn

    The only good thing about this spin is that because all of these companies are touting a win, the public will be even more confused when they come back next year looking to “reform” some more!

    • Linda174

      The original Rhee commercial with the fake teachers is still running. I heard it this morning…contatct your legislators and tell them to get this right…blah, blah, blah.  They really should coordinate their propaganda a little better. Michelle is onto a new state and doesn’t even know who phony ad is passe, but then again she is not really known for facts and truth.

      • guest

        I heard that one of the pro-reform ConnCAN ads that circulated had a picture of my child and his school.  No one that I know gave permission for that to happen.  Since we don’t have t.v., I don’t know how to check this and then lodge a complaint.  Any ideas?

      • Linda174

        I am not sure ConnCan had a tv ad, are you?

        You should be able to request that from them? Not that they are big on transparency. There were so many organizations: CBIA, CCER, CAPSS…maybe you should find out what the commercial said and if it was on TV vs. radio.

      • guest

        I’ll check these out.  I am not at all sure if it was ConnCAN, but a friend told me it was pro-SB 24 in its first incarnation…  something few if any of the school personnel or parents authorized or supported ( I want to say none of the parents, but I don’t know for sure!).

      • anniemil

         You can check the ConnCAN website. They have a video section and do have one of their TV ads. Check out http://conncan.org/learn/videos

    • Linda174

      Riccards was boasting on the radio today how they would be back next year for more reforms. He doesn’t actually have a job if not for this faux movement.  What else would he do?  Sell used cars?  Lead a boy scout group into the woods?  Any other ideas?

      • Magister

        He could try stand up comedy; he looks a bit like Louis CK.

        If he has some time on his hands, perhaps he could enroll in ARC and try education reform up close?

      • Linda174

        He wouldn’t even be capable of managing the ISS position….maybe lunch duty.

      • CONconn

        He’ll be back so long as he isn’t asked to step down as CEO. Luckily for CT children, he was completly incompetent as a CEO. He gets trashed wherever he posts his propaganda on the web and he can’t even manage a facebook entity for his company without every post exposing the truth of these corporate leaches. We should all hope it’ll be that guy who is back next year with a fresh batch of Subway sandwiches, and not someone who actually looks the part and is effective at peddling this trash.

      • guest

        Adamowski is busy inventing jobs in Windham.  He has an elementary school all picked out as a charter for Pryor (he desperately wanted the full Commissioner’s Network to pass, so they could take over the entire district)–maybe Riccards can get some CEO position here???  Keep your eyes on Windham, folks, Adamowski does not want to let this opportunity pass!

      • savage

        You know what? The moment I heard the term “special master,” long before they announced that the position would be filled by Adamowski, I knew that there was trouble in store for Windham. “Special Master?” Really? That’s a made-up, pretentious, “reformy” title if ever I’ve heard one. I agree with guest–Adamowski is really, really bad news. He needs to be watched very, very carefully.

      • jonpelto

        Got some more bad stuff on him already – just need to write up.
        Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • guest

        I can’t “like” this one enough!

  • http://twitter.com/tlsjones Steven Jones

    Righteousness is in the eye of the beholder. Or, as Jonathan Haidt’s most recent book (The Righteous Mind) says about ideology, rhetoric, and argument in politics:

    “Moral intuitions arise automatically and almost instantaneously, long
    before moral reasoning has a chance to get started, and those first
    intuitions tend to drive our later reasoning. If you think that moral
    reasoning is something we do to figure out the truth, you’ll be
    constantly frustrated by how foolish, biased, and illogical people
    become when they disagree with you. But if you think about moral
    reasoning as a skill we humans evolved to further our social agendas—to
    justify our own actions and to defend the teams we belong to—then things
    will make a lot more sense. Keep your eye on the intuitions, and don’t
    take people’s moral arguments at face value. They’re mostly post-hoc
    constructions made up on the fly, crafted to advance one or more
    strategic objectives.”

    I really wish I could pay this guy to do a case study on this legislative session and the psychological debate over education reform. What it was, what it evolved into, and what it will be in the coming years.

    Keep up the passionate writing Jon, it is always a pleasure to read.

  • THREEFIFTHS2004

    The children still will fail.Bills and money will not help.

  • Bernard

    I believe I read in the Courant yesterday that Pryor would be able to have 25 schools in his commissioner’s network as a result of the  latest compromise…does anyone know if that is true? I thought the Commissioner would only be able to take over 6 failing schools, at least that’s what we were lead to believe with the revised legislation prior to this 11th hour deal…While I know collective bargaining is still intact, I hope that was a misprint regarding the 25…

    • Linda174

      Only six can be charter schools…the others have to be another turn around model determined by a committee within the school (parents, teachers, admin, union). And of the six, they have to have a plan to recruit and retain students of all abilities and two have to have a focus on ELL students. I can link the OLR analysis which explains it in simpler language.

    • Linda174
  • Linda174

    I don’t know why I even clicked on it, but I just read Rick Green’s newest “blog” posting. I am soon to be arrested or committed. I can’t stand his disrespect for my profession.  Here is the link..feel free to send Rick your love, too.

    http://courantblogs.com/rick-green/wait-malloys-reforms-win-177-to-7-what/#comment-4516
    Rick Green – Will you EVER EVER give some credit, recognition and respect to TEACHERS? Did you have a teacher that was once mean to you? Did your children ever have teachers you respected? I am SICK of your continued blatant disregard for our profession. Some of the changes and revisions were due to the writing, calling and conversations TEACHERS had with their elected officials – remember? – our alliances and relationships. Yes, we were intelligent enough to read the bill for ourselves; we did not wait for CEA to tell us what to think despite your rantings. Do you ever stop to give us any credit for knowing anything?Have you learned anything these past few months that didn’t already match your pre-conceived notion? Are you even willing to listen to another point of view?I have to say your blog is usually a cut and paste of other articles or blogs and then a few original sentences. However, they are not that original. You have said the same thing over and over with a new headline here and there.I plan on using some of your posts to teach my SEVENTH graders how NOT to write in order to persuade others to listen to your point of view.If you would like to correct your record and acknowledge the contributions teachers make every day, I suggest you post a new opinion piece praising our efforts and our life-long dedication. This is teacher appreciation week if you do not already know that.And by the way, “NONE OF THIS” would have happened if the teachers did not stand up for themselves and their students and refuse to let coporate “reformers” steam roll over OUR schools: Michelle Rhee/Students First or GNEPSA (which one is it now or has she slithered to another state?), ConnCan (Riccards and his side show), CCER (the bankers and coporate know-it-alls – who sat in the back of an Amistad class and now are experts on education), etc.etc. etc.Please read…possibly I should send this to your email.Yes, I am a bit irate, but guess what? I don’t care anymore…we are tired of being demeaned, disrespected and disregarded.

    • CONconn

      Rick Green’s just upset that now this is over, people will go back to not caring about his blog. 

      • Linda174

        Now he needs a new topic where all he does is cut and paste and post a sentence here and there.  Maybe we should make some suggestions….how else to suck  up to Malloy and Roy O.
        My 7th graders are smarter.

      • Magister

        Rick Green is the journalistic equivalent of a child who sticks his fingers in his ears and says “lalalalalalalalala” when being addressed by an adult.

      • Linda174

        He just sent me an email asking me if I wanted to write something “setting the record straight” and he would post it unedited. I told the pompous a@@ there was no record to set straight. He would just use my thoughts and word to mock my profession and maybe he should get permission from Dannel and Roy O first.

    • TMS

      Dear Linda174,

      Please do not give Rick Green any more of your time and attention. He’s worth your pitty, not your intellect or reason. If he were accomplished in anything, he wouldn’t be at the Hartford Courant. It’s just his opinion, don’t elevate it to something more than that with responding to him.

      • savage

        “If he were accomplished in anything, he wouldn’t be at the Hartford Courant.”

        Not saying that I disagree with you, but was wondering whether you’d be willing to explain your reasoning behind this. I’m curious.

      • TMS

        Savage ~

        I’m and old-school journalist, trained at Columbia and NYU, was an editor at the Wall Street Journal before becoming a producer for a national television network. I know some pretty accomplished journalist/writers.

        Any one serious about wanting to excel in their profession, especially journalism, doesn’t aspire to or settle for the Hartford Courant. 

        I’m only speaking in the context of this blog and the fact that he’s a “writer”. It’s just my opinion, but from a professional stand point you want to be the best, work with the best and work for the best. In the context of this blog, it’s no different than wanting certified, well-trained teachers in the classroom.  

  • anniemil

    Two of the “reforms” you cite are very disturbing. CT is really going to administer standardized tests to kindergarteners? That is definitely neither age nor developmentally appropriate. I wonder what respected NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children) would have to say about that? From their website: Standardized tests for kindergarten children are generally not appropriate because they have limited language and writing skills, so the test may not reflect what children know. Also, children at this age develop according to their own timetable, making a standardized test less meaningful. Instead of testing kindergartners, teachers should collect samples of children’s work to guide and adjust their teaching. Did the legislators do their research? I suspect not. They probably didn’t even read/know that was in the bill since they didn’t receive it until the 11th hour. Shame on them!!!

    And giving an annual exam to teachers on reading instruction practices is very condescending and insulting. Are they (legislators) that uninformed? There is no way a K-3 certified CT teacher could/would NOT know how to teach reading. It’s impossible to make it that far in CT without that knowledge! I think maybe the legislators should be given an annual, written civics exam on all the required responsibilities of the office they hold. And the results should be made public.

    • TMS

      WOW!!! Love your suggestions. Please run so I can vote for you.

  • AM

    Riccards is just trying to save his job….made up as it may be.  Something tells me Alex Johnston knew this was going to happen and stepped down in time for someone else to take the fall.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=730660273 Joanne Tolles

    Questions from a concerned CT educator – when and how do we find out which CT schools are to be the first victims of this Commissioners Network of Schools next year. I am having nightmares already….

    • jonpelto

      He picks them in July

      Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

    • guest

      You can bet Windham will be victimized (again).

  • savage
    • guest

      Thank you so much, I missed this.
      Adamowski is making sure to cut out anything that was positive in Windham–such as pre-K.  Athletics has always been a point of pride, and athletes are often good students, too.  But Adamowski has to bulldoze over everything and everybody who wants to see true improvement.
      Adamowski further erodes this district by creating new jobs and then not advertising them.  There is no due process–his hand-picked disciples get the posts.  I have nothing agains Gene Blain–but the man retired 2 years ago!  Adamowski is dragging him out of retirement and placing him in a job for which there will be no job ad and no job search.  AND he is eliminating a crucial position of Athletic Director.

      • savage

        I know nothing about Gene Blain. But to announce that he’s eliminating Pat Risley’s job without even having the courtesy to talk to him about his role,  sports in town, etc.–that’s just disrespectful, immoral–WRONG!  Aren’t there supposed to be laws re public school appointments/hiring? Isn’t Adamowski breaking them?

  • CT Dad

    Yeah…. Where is that “Mission Accomplished!” banner when you really need it!

    • jonpelto

      I can’t remember do we have a rule about the number of times a person can win the funniest comment of the day award. I swear CT Dad you seem Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

  • jonpelto

    Maybe when you make that much money you don’t have to be classy – or you have someone else be classy for you. Can we shout back – fascist? Takes one to know one :) . Or do you kiss your kids with that mouth or where is kanye when you need him.
    What is so interesting is that capitalist pigs like that can’t imagine people do stuff only if they are paid – its inconceivable that I’d spend all this time digging and educating people because I believe in something.
    If you ever run into him you can tell him that no matter how much he doesn’t want to believe there is no one paying me.
    Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

    • savage

      “Its inconceivable that I’d spend all this time digging and educating people because I believe in something.”

      Exactly–people who live only for money cannot imagine someone being driven by ideals or morality.

      • jonpelto

        Well I’d rather be stuck on the desert island with you and the good guys any day of the week :)

        Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

      • savage

        Right back atcha!

  • jonpelto

    Thank you – please keep us informed – were all eager to hear about developments. Getting them down from 25 charter schools to six was a good step as was removing all that garbage about firing staff – and baiing collective bargaining – but they can still do damage so hopefully we can help you protect the children if need be,
    Sent from my BlackBerry please excuss typos

  • sharewhut

    ‘saved collective bargaining’- my brain’s been too much otherwise occupied to put into a cohesive argument, but I sense they can fashion a workaround  via sections 19-G and 20. A lot will depend on who’s picking the zebra…