Shared Sacrifice Strikes Again: No additional new taxes – oh except for you over there..

9 Comments

When Governor Dannel Malloy delivered his proposed state budget last February he included the deepest cuts in state history to Connecticut’s public colleges and universities.  The Democratically controlled legislature followed his lead and approved those cuts.

The University of Connecticut’s block grant (state appropriation) took a hit of about $25 million from the amount it needed to maintain its current level of services.

Then, as a result of the Malloy/SEBAC state employee agreement, the Malloy Administration has now removed $20 million this year even though the agreement saves UConn far less than that amount.

The net effect is that over the next 2 years UConn will be short about $90 million and as much as $140 million less than what is needed over the next four years.

Yesterday the University of Connecticut Board of Trustees adopted a series of record tuition and fee increases.  Together they will drive up the cost of attending UConn by 28% or more.

CTNewsjunkie did a great job reporting on the issue.  Definitely check it out at  http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/ctnj.php/archives/entry/uconn_trustees_approve_four-year_plan_to_raise_tuition/

UConn and the Trustees  said the money will be used exclusively to hire 290 new faculty.

However UConn will need new funds simply to keep key programs intact.  The  28% increase in tuition and fees would mean UConn could make up some of the money it will have lost from the State.  The new tuition increase will bring in about $50 million dollars over the next four years.  Even if they used the money to keep existing programs going they’d still be short about $40 million over the next two years to maintain its current level of services.

It wasn’t long ago that the state of Connecticut paid for half the cost of running UConn and students and parents paid the other half.  As a result of reduced support over the years and Malloy’s cuts this year, the state share has dropped to 27%.

Now students and parents are picking up an overwhelming percentage of the costs associated with running Connecticut’s flagship university and that percentage will grow substantially over the next four years.

As Governor, Malloy serves as President of the UConn Board of Trustees and with a number of state commissioners automatically serving on the UConn board, as well as political appointees, Malloy controls the Board and its decisions.  With yesterday’s vote he will not only have authored the deepest cuts in state history at UConn but he and his team will be responsible for instituting these massive tuition increases.

While Governor Malloy may not understand or appreciate the impact raising tuition and fees by 28 percent or more will have on Connecticut’s middle income families, he certainly understands the politics.  The UConn Board took the unprecedented step of approving four years of tuition increases with a single vote – meaning they won’t have to vote again until after the next election.

In the past the Board of Trustees have only adopted its new tuition and fee schedule one year at a time since the need for increased tuition and fees depends on what the State is or isn’t providing to UConn that year.

And as previously mentioned, the real kicker is that UConn is claiming that these increases are being implemented so they can hire more faculty.  As so many students have come to learn, UConn doesn’t have enough professors which means classes sizes have grown and some students can’t even get the courses they need to graduate in four years.

Since 1995, the number of students attending UConn has increased by 56% while there has only been a minor increase in the number of faculty.

But the fact is, the vast majority of the funds brought in by these new tuition hikes will be needed to make up for the $140 million that state is withholding over the next four years.

But rather than admitting that fact, the Board of Trustees is misleading the students, parents and the public.

As their own defense, UConn is claiming that even with these tuition and fee increases, the University of Connecticut remains a bargain because it is less expensive than most other major universities.

While other schools may cost more, these increases are – in fact – the equivalent of a major tax increase for every Connecticut family who is sending a student to UConn.

As to the notion that families can afford those additional costs;  of the 16,496 undergraduate students who attended UConn in the Fall of 2010,  9,336 qualified for “need-based” support meaning those families have already proven they cannot afford to cover the existing costs of attending the University let alone 28% more.

The Malloy version of “Shared Sacrifice” – More taxes for middle income families and then, as a result of state budget cuts, those same families will now face significantly higher costs to send their kids to college.

Be Sociable, Share!

  • Wilton Businessman

    I guess the students will just have to default on 28% more student loan debt in the future. What’s the big deal? Uncle Sugar is going to pickup the tab for the basket weavers union and the poli-sci majors anyway.

    • jonpelto

      I’ve missed you Wilton Businessman – really have – always enjoy the comments (Often a bit conservative for me but at least your opinions are sincere). Interesting the primary default rate is for the “For Profit” sector that promises a quick education and a great job. “The share of federal student loan defaults rose sharply last year, especially at for-profit colleges and universities, where 15 percent of borrowers defaulted in the first two years of repayment, up from 11.6 percent the previous year. At public institutions, the rate was 7.2 percent, up from 6 percent, and at not-for-profit private institutions, it was 4.6 percent, up from 4 percent.” New York Times 9/12/2011. So in this case we can agree – the for profit capitalist “colleges” that run all the tv ads telling kids in less than a year you can have a $70,000 a year job are lying. So taxpayers subsidize the loans and then take the hit when this kids can’t pay because they don’t have jobs. This is one situation in which even conservatives can agree we need strong regulations to stop these for profit “schools”. Maybe we make the schools pay into a fund based on the proportion of graduates who get jobs.

  • CT Dad

    Don’t you get it, JP? It’s all the fault of those pushy UConn students, who insist that their tuition entitles them to “frills” like classes, with teachers.

    {PS. When they *could* be getting home-college-schooled for nothing!}

    The sheer impudence of the 99% can be quite galling, DYT?

  • Sharewhut

    Oh, and here’s $1/4 million per year (salaries only!) of where that shared sacrifice is going..
    http://das.ct.gov/HRDocs/JobsExams/HCPBSRetirement%20BenefitOfficer.pdf

  • http://gravatar.com/cccom cccom

    Jon,

    Politics is all about making choices. If Governor Malloy – who wants to re-invent Connecticut – had not chosen to spend nearly $900 million on the UConn Health Center, he would have had around $700 million to defray tuition costs at the college proper. But he didn’t, and now the college is forced to cover the losses in state aid by bumping up tuition.

    That’s life. We live in a world of finite choices, and finite resources. People should learn to live with it. Political choices have consequences. Those who do not like the consequences should have opposed the precipitating choices.

    • jonpelto

      cccom, I knew eventually we’d agree on something! :) That’s why I thought and think the Governor’s plan for the Health Center and all our eggs in one basket on Genome research was a mistake.

      • http://gravatar.com/cccom cccom

        A miracle, and just in tinme for Christmas too.

      • http://gravatar.com/cccom cccom

        I mentioned it here: http://bit.ly/vNgsuk

  • Pingback: More About UConn’s Historic Tuition Increase… « Wait, What?